RE: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-30 by Tony Karavidas
Because THEN it s not an analog process. I could have gone full DSP and had a CODEC and a DSP and that s about it, (which is something Chris and I were
Messages
Browse messages
Page 408 of 690 · 34488 messages matched
Re: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-30 by jhaible
... all ... frequency ... like ... Calibrated V/Oct response adds one usefull application: Transposing the shift oscillator in parallel with the VCOs (or
Re: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-30 by jhaible
... Why ? If you make the oscillators digital (which is a good idea), you might as well replace the multipliers with multiplying DACs. JH.
Re: [motm] OT: step-down converters for switzerland/germany
2002-01-30 by jhaible
Look for Trenntrafo (that s 230V - 230V) and pick one with center tapped winding. JH. ... Von: Aaron Day An:
Punching Panels was (Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM)
2002-01-29 by Dave Hylander
Aircraft aluminum is really nothing special in the way of hardness. It flexes better which is important for aircraft and it weld more cleanly than lower
RE: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-29 by Tony Karavidas
No it s not. Remember the local oscillator needs to span a range of 17 octaves ( not far off from Paul s ultra VCO, and that VCO alone costs $349 assembled. )
RE: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-29 by Brousseau, Paul E (Paul)
Hm? You re saying it s not calibrated for 1V/oct? When you say a digital oscilator, what exactly do you mean? A DCO? A value-lookup table? The only thing
RE: [motm] supplying schematics (was: Lord of the Ring Mod)
2002-01-29 by Tony Karavidas
I think companies are all over the map in this area. I ve given out schematics on a need to know basis, but most people really don t need to know this info.
RE: [motm] Re: Expressionist2
2002-01-29 by Tony Karavidas
I have been thinking about a smaller version (sans display), but choosing the right features is a trick. Tony
RE: [motm] new encore modules
2002-01-29 by Tony Karavidas
Why? Wouldn t an active thru work ok for you? Tony
RE: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-29 by Les Mizzell
... I would much rather have the increased functionality and enhanced frequency range that using the digital oscillator would bring. I ve oft wondered why we
RE: [motm] more NAMM poop
2002-01-29 by Tony Karavidas
Sorry for the huge delay replying to this. I ve been really sick for over a week now. The FS shown at NAMM is neither of those things, but one change that is
[motm] OT: step-down converters for switzerland/germany
2002-01-29 by Aaron Day
hello- can any of the swiss or german inhabitants on the list tell me what you call a 220v-110v step down converter auf deutsch? i have been bashing away at
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by mark@indole.net
... It can probably do .079 aluminum with a 5,000lb press -- do you have one of those?? :) Regardless, painted .125 is about twice as thick as unpainted
Re: [motm] VCO sync
2002-01-29 by sikorsky
... VCO ... hello all, i tried this one - a classic 2 x VCO hard sync combo, into a 440LPF, 440 fm1 modulated by the inverse EG output, except that the hard
Re: [motm] VCO sync
2002-01-29 by J. Larry Hendry
PB, I would be most interested in hearing about your wanderings in this arena. I love the 300 osc classic hard sync tones. Sometimes I like to soft synth
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by J. Larry Hendry
It comes from all those big amps we have at work. They are significantly larger than the amps we get to play with at home. I will be letting amps into a
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by mate_stubb
... I *don t think* this can punch 0.125 aircraft aluminum :) ...
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by J. Larry Hendry
I have not seen the Mouser Greenlee. But, we do punch stuff much stronger than 1/8 alum at work with them. The Greenlee is one awesome tool. We even have
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by ivancu@aol.com
In a message dated 1/28/02 6:52:12 PM, jlarryh@iquest.net writes: I really like Unibits. Get the real thing at just
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by J. Larry Hendry
On the subject of Micro-mark, I got their small hobby metal brake. A cool tool to have for the occasional fabrication. I used it to create the very first
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by Paul Schreiber
I *don t think* this can punch 0.125 aircraft aluminum :)
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by Craig Critchley
Do punches work ok on 1/8 thick MOTM-style panels? The catalog says up to .079 thick aluminum. ... From: Charles Stella To:
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by J. Larry Hendry
They make a thing called a uni-bit. (perhaps same as what others are calling tapered reamer) They use them a lot at work because they are fast. Me, I have a
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by Charles Stella
Mouser has a one inch Greenlee punch for $22. I have various sizes of these for XLR s etc. Makes a very clean hole. Charles.
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by nathan durham
... Mine s a hand-held reamer, cost about $8-10, easy and safe. nathan
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by nathan durham
... Mine is about 3/4 at the end. nathan
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by KA4HJH
... Micro-Mark has the 1/2 Unibit for $23 (and a lot of other cool tools as well): http://www.micromark.com/ Direct link to it:
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-29 by jwbarlow@aol.com
In a message dated 1/28/02 3:11:26 PM Pacific Standard Time, nate@webfarm.com ... You specifically want a tapered reamer -- definitely worth it compared to
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-28 by nathan durham
I needed to enlarge some holes in a panel recently. I went to Villagers Hardware and found a reamer; half a dozen turns and the holes were just the right size.
VCO sync
2002-01-28 by sikorsky
hello all, and now - inspired from something that was posted on Gas Station, i ve been experimenting with trying to alter the sync signal between a pair of
Re: [motm] Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-28 by Scott Juskiw
... A big drill bit and a round file will do it every time. Draw the 1 inch hole on the metal with a pencil. Start with a small hole in the middle of the and
Help Guys MOTM
2002-01-28 by thomas white
Hi Gang, I am in the process of MOTM Izing my Wiard Joyrider VCF into a 3 space panel and I need to know the details of punching a 1 inch hole in the panel for
Re: [motm] uVCO
2002-01-28 by Paul Schreiber
1) I am pestering someone to go a MOTM version of a thru-FM VCO. It s not on the gotta have list for 2002. 2) There are only a few 310s in the field. They
uVCO
2002-01-28 by mmarsh100
Hello All - Thanks to everybody that replied to my question about through zero. I d love to hear it now that I understand it a little better. On another topic,
RE: [motm] Re: future oscillators
2002-01-28 by Fahl, Romeo
This isn t terribly scientific, but if the FM voltage goes below zero, the VCO s phase reverses. I think Juergen refers to this as reversing the spin of the
Re: [motm] Re: future oscillators
2002-01-27 by jhaible
Thru Zero FM sounds like linear FM. The only difference is that you can have a much higher modulation index. On ordinary VCOs, linear FM hits a natural barrier
Re: [motm] MOTM 300 problem
2002-01-27 by Paul Schreiber
1) Be sure diodes D1 and D2 are in the right orientation. 2) Be sure there is +5V on both ends of ferrite L3. 3) Be sure you have 100pf caps in C26 and C23,
MOTM 300 problem
2002-01-27 by gooboworks
I just completed my second 300 Oscillator. It appears that everything works fine except the Sine and Triangle have no output. The Saw and Pulse work fine.
Re: future oscillators
2002-01-27 by mmarsh100
Thanks, Scott. That sounds interesting - instant new waveforms... ... direction
Time Machine page update
2002-01-27 by J. Larry Hendry
I finally got all the editing done and links installed. In addition to the thumbnail page for viewing Time Machine Photos, now the photos are all linked from
[motm] Re: future oscillators
2002-01-27 by Scott Juskiw
... I ve never had an oscillator capable of through zero FM, so I can t comment on how it sounds. If I remember this correctly (brain isn t as young as it used
Re: future oscillators
2002-01-27 by mmarsh100
What s cool about through zero ? I ve heard it mentioned several times on the list but I still don t know what it refers to... Mike ... partially ... be
RE: future oscillators
2002-01-27 by mate_stubb
... Are there any plans for more MOTM branded oscillators that have a feature set which is different than the 300? I am wondering if there are any plans
Re: any Oakley Wavefolder and Blacet Klangwerk users out there?
2002-01-27 by mmarsh100
I have a WF in a Stooge Panel and I use it all the time. Gives real meat to triangle waveforms for example. Some settings give full rectification (and
future oscillators
2002-01-26 by Scott Juskiw
This is a question for Paul S, but I thought I d post to the group in case others are as curious as I am. Are there any plans for more MOTM branded oscillators
any Oakley Wavefolder and Blacet Klangwerk users out there?
2002-01-26 by Scott Juskiw
Help me help make the Stooges rich! I noticed that Stooge panels are available for the Oakley Wavefolder and Blacet Klangwerk. Despite still not having
ooh noo !
2002-01-26 by sikorsky
hello all, many thanks to John Loffink for putting up that Buchla MARF manual, one day i ll understand - but that s the beauty of the mini-wave - there s so
Re: [motm] MOTM hole spacing?
2002-01-26 by Dave Hylander
I put the template for the hole spacing which I use @ http://www.hylander.com/images/motm/MOTM-template.gif dave
RE: MOTM hole spacing?
2002-01-26 by mate_stubb
... Does anyone have a template showing the standard positioning of MOTM front panel holes including the rack-rail holes?