Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Re: motm maximum mounting depth

Re: motm maximum mounting depth

2002-11-08 by paulhaneberg

I would take the depth of the MOTM modules such as the 300 and add 
at least 2 inches.  If you build one of the Blacet/Stooge panel 
modules such as the Time Machine you will need the extra depth.  
Additionally, you never know what you're going to want to do in the 
future.  When I built my cabinet I put in slanted rows similar to 
the Synth of Doom.  I've found that I can only mount certain deep 
modules like the Blacet conversions in the lower rows, which are 
deeper.

By the way, as a big fan of 2001, although not a big fan of Nietche, 
I love the monolith/Zarathustra concept.

Re: [motm] Re: motm maximum mounting depth

2002-11-10 by media.nai@rcn.com

Thanks to everyone who answered :)

>When I built my cabinet I put in slanted rows similar to
>the Synth of Doom.  I've found that I can only mount certain deep
>modules like the Blacet conversions in the lower rows, which are
>deeper.

That makes sense.  Many of the cabinets I've seen are beautiful, but they
are too bulky for my needs.

>By the way, as a big fan of 2001, although not a big fan of Nietche,
>I love the monolith/Zarathustra concept.

It's also appropriate.  By the time Paul finishes the backlog, we'll all be
living in outer space ;)

I hope I can get a case in all black -- almost all road cases use unpainted
aluminum somewhere on the outside.  It's very important that the case
remains rigid even with the front lid removed and I don't think that can be
done without using some sort of metal.

I'm also thinking of making it 5U shorter -- 35U rather than 40U.  It will
be closer to five feet than six feet in height, so it I can use everything
without getting out of my chair.  It will also look finished much sooner,
and be less likely to tip over.

Oh, yeah it will also be closer to the proportions of the Sentinel :)

While that will give me less room for future expansion, it will still have
30 motm units of "regular" modules, which imho is a very capable monosynth,
as well as 15 rack units for 500, 600, and third-party modules.

Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV converter which I need to
keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on buying a 650.  Only one
other 600-series module has been announced, the 3U sequencer, so as it
stands now there is still another seven motm units left in the 600 panel.

(remember, it's not a real modular unless you can swap the modules around :)

Based on the dimensions in the Digikey catalog, a CP131-A should just about
fit in a 2U box.  That leaves 2U.  Since I want to leave the rear lid on
during use, I'll put a 1U perforated panel at very top for ventilation, and
leave 1U at very bottom open to run the MIDI and power cable out the front.

Re: [motm] Re: motm maximum mounting depth

2002-11-10 by mate_stubb

BTW, 

The Synth of Doom cab has been carefully planned to allow deep 
modules anywhere. Because of its concave mounting profile, the top 
row would be the worst case, since pcbs are mounted at the top of the 
module, and since the tilt of the top row thrusts the back of the pcb 
up into the top. That's why the top rail is spaced about 1.5" lower 
than the top in front - to allow for that clearance. I keep my Time 
Machines mounted in the top row with a little clearance to spare.

Moe
http://www.hotrodmotm.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>When I built my cabinet I put in slanted rows similar to
>the Synth of Doom. I've found that I can only mount certain deep
>modules like the Blacet conversions in the lower rows, which are
>deeper.

Re: [motm] Re: motm maximum mounting depth

2002-11-10 by Tentochi

> Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV
> converter which I need to
> keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on
> buying a 650.

Wouldn't it be possible to have a small convertor
cable (phono to DIN) to allow DIN Sync (24 or 48) if
the software outputs the proper signals???

--Shemp

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2

DIN (was: motm maximum mounting depth)

2002-11-12 by media.nai@rcn.com

At 9:20 AM -0800 11/10/02, Tentochi wrote:
>> Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV
>> converter which I need to
>> keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on
>> buying a 650.
>
>Wouldn't it be possible to have a small convertor
>cable (phono to DIN) to allow DIN Sync (24 or 48) if
>the software outputs the proper signals???

Huh??

Re: [motm] DIN ! (clock out from 101)

2002-11-12 by Aaron Day

I second this. Having a DIN sync somewhere on a panel would be great for
playing with other people that have x0x boxes. I love my little 606 but
loathe having another "box" to make it talk to other machines. Seems the 101
is as good of place as any. The MIDI-->CV module is already max-ed out in
terms of functionality vs. price/space.



> At 9:20 AM -0800 11/10/02, Tentochi wrote:
>>> Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV
>>> converter which I need to
>>> keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on
>>> buying a 650.
>> 
>> Wouldn't it be possible to have a small convertor
>> cable (phono to DIN) to allow DIN Sync (24 or 48) if
>> the software outputs the proper signals???
> 
> Huh??
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .


-
Receive-Transmit

Aaron Day
aaron@...

-

Office: +49 030.231.80965
Mobile: +49 179.750.1854

-
Münzstr 21
Berlin 10178.
Germany

Re: [motm] DIN ! (clock out from 101)

2002-11-12 by media.nai@rcn.com

At 5:33 PM +0100 11/12/02, Aaron Day wrote:
>
>I second this. Having a DIN sync somewhere on a panel would be great for
>playing with other people that have x0x boxes. I love my little 606 but
>loathe having another "box" to make it talk to other machines. Seems the
>>101 is as good of place as any.

Yes, that makes.  A way to do this would be to use the 101 internal clock
(or any MOTM pulse) at 24 times the frequency for DIN, they divide it down
with the 500 pulse divider (which I hope goes up to 24 =:O) and then stick
the divider clock back into the 101 external clock input.

It is much easier to divide clocks than to multiply clocks.

Any, I plan on keeping my Pro-4, and maybe even putting together a KADI
breakout panel (are there any Stooge Kenton panels?? It seems likely as
Kenton converters are on the Synthesis Technology website).

I also decided to go with the 40U case.


And I still have no idea what Todd meant :)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>> At 9:20 AM -0800 11/10/02, Tentochi wrote:
>>>> Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV
>>>> converter which I need to
>>>> keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on
>>>> buying a 650.
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be possible to have a small convertor
>>> cable (phono to DIN) to allow DIN Sync (24 or 48) if
>>> the software outputs the proper signals???
>>
>> Huh??

Power Distribution

2002-11-12 by Tentochi

Distributing power in your system to both MOTM and
Modc@n modules?  Also allows for pitch, gate, trig and
CV distribution from keyboard.  Here is the solution:

http://www.microtonalsynthesis.com/~cynthia/modules_powerdist.php

--Shemp

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive greatest hits videos
http://launch.yahoo.com/u2

Re: [motm] DIN ! (clock out from 101)

2002-11-12 by J. Larry Hendry

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: <media.nai@...>
Any, I plan on keeping my Pro-4, and maybe even putting together a KADI
breakout panel (are there any Stooge Kenton panels?? It seems likely as
Kenton converters are on the Synthesis Technology website).


LH:  We have one for the pro-2000, but not the Pro 4 (yet)
Larry

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.