> The Roland kicked butt. I had an RE-201 for years, wish I still did.
> It is
> much more hi-fi than the echoplex, and had a much longer length tape
> which
> lasted longer. I think the echoplex could do longer delays, however,
> cause
> you could move the head farther from the record head. The Roland also
> had a
> spring verb unit as a bonus.
>
> Be careful buying an old mechanical tape unit - the heads are probably
> no
> longer replaceable, and you'll have to make your own tapes when they
> need
> replacement. Use a tape with a heavy backing.
>
> I'm not familiar with the Vox, so I can't speak about it.
>
> Dave Bradley
> Principal Software Engineer
> Engineering Animation, Inc.
> daveb@...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: james holloway [mailto:jimh54@...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2000 8:40 AM
> > To: motm@egroups.com
> > Subject: [motm] Echoes revisited
> >
> >
> > I'm thinking of buying either a Vox echo unit or an Echoplex
> > unit. even the
> > Roland may be a possibility. Any one of the learned minds out
> > there have an
> > opinion as to which would be better or are they both about the
> > same? I want
> > the old analog (tape loop) type of effect. Also how much would be a
> fair
> > price?
> > Thanks.
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>