Yahoo Groups archive

MOTM

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:35 UTC

Thread

Urgent Request for Gear Photos

Urgent Request for Gear Photos

2000-05-22 by Tkacs, Ken

Calling all cars:

We are currently putting together an advertisement for Synthesis Technology
that will appear in several major music publications. The ad is laid out,
but we need a really good photo of some modules to finish it up.

This photo needs to be high resolution and we need it pretty much *tomorrow*
to meet deadlines. If you are able to snap a good photo and get it into our
hands in this timeframe, please let Paul and I know via private email.

The photo needs to yell "MODULAR!" at a glance.

It needs to be a fairly close shot of some modules, 2 rows high by five
wide, roughly, is a good area to frame, but use your judgment. We would
particularly like to highlight VCOs in the picture, if possible. A few
patchcords would help show this system 'in action,' but not so many that
they obscure the modules or cast too many complex & distracting shadows.

The photo needs to be very high resolution, as the demands of print
resolution are an order of magnitude greater than for web/CRT. Either a
high-end digital camera, or a 35mm photo scanned at high resolution may do
the job.

(I myself have the use of a pretty nice digital camera, but still find it
difficult to take a clear shot of these modules because of the contrast
between the small, fine white writing on the overwhelmingly black panels...
the tricky contrast and lighting conditions wreak havoc with the camera's
pickup, apparently.)

If sending the photo electronically, it needs to be uncompressed, or at
least compressed with a non-lossy compression scheme. This means no JPeG
files. TIFF is ideal, and TIFF using LZW compression is fine, too (LZW is
non-lossy, but you may find that it doesn't help photographic images much,
and sometimes makes them bigger... if you can, try both ways and see which
is smallest, but *quality* is the chief concern here). GIF files also use a
non-lossy compression scheme, but are limited to 256 colors/shades. Now,
normally that causes a 'solarized' look in photographic images, but this
could be acceptable if you first convert your image/scan to grayscale (using
PhotoShop or whatever) since the final will be monochrome anyway. Again, see
if using GIF helps or hurts file size (since GIF uses an LZW compression
scheme, too, which is the same method used for 'zipping' a file with
WinZip).

I can do final cropping and retouching on the image, so when it doubt, take
it a little 'wide' to give me some swing room.

My email system doesn't limit attachment sizes, and I have a full T-1 on my
end, so the size of the file isn't an issue on my end.

If you have any questions, technical or otherwise, please email me. Thanks
in advance for any help with this.

Re: [motm] Urgent Request for Gear Photos

2000-05-22 by Nathan Hunsicker

is this a b&w of color ad? is the ad designed already? what size will it
be. how big will the image have to be? i have access to nikon d1's and a
photo studio, the only problem I have is that my modular only has one VCO
and has white lines on each module to seperate the modules. Let me know, I
guess you could use me as a last resort. -Nate>
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>
>Calling all cars:
>
>
>
>We are currently putting together an advertisement for Synthesis Technology
>
>that will appear in several major music publications. The ad is laid out,
>
>but we need a really good photo of some modules to finish it up.
>
>
>
>This photo needs to be high resolution and we need it pretty much *tomorrow*
>
>to meet deadlines. If you are able to snap a good photo and get it into our
>
>hands in this timeframe, please let Paul and I know via private email.
>
>
>
>The photo needs to yell "MODULAR!" at a glance.
>
>
>
>It needs to be a fairly close shot of some modules, 2 rows high by five
>
>wide, roughly, is a good area to frame, but use your judgment. We would
>
>particularly like to highlight VCOs in the picture, if possible. A few
>
>patchcords would help show this system 'in action,' but not so many that
>
>they obscure the modules or cast too many complex & distracting shadows.
>
>
>
>The photo needs to be very high resolution, as the demands of print
>
>resolution are an order of magnitude greater than for web/CRT. Either a
>
>high-end digital camera, or a 35mm photo scanned at high resolution may do
>
>the job.
>
>
>
>(I myself have the use of a pretty nice digital camera, but still find it
>
>difficult to take a clear shot of these modules because of the contrast
>
>between the small, fine white writing on the overwhelmingly black panels...
>
>the tricky contrast and lighting conditions wreak havoc with the camera's
>
>pickup, apparently.)
>
>
>
>If sending the photo electronically, it needs to be uncompressed, or at
>
>least compressed with a non-lossy compression scheme. This means no JPeG
>
>files. TIFF is ideal, and TIFF using LZW compression is fine, too (LZW is
>
>non-lossy, but you may find that it doesn't help photographic images much,
>
>and sometimes makes them bigger... if you can, try both ways and see which
>
>is smallest, but *quality* is the chief concern here). GIF files also use a
>
>non-lossy compression scheme, but are limited to 256 colors/shades. Now,
>
>normally that causes a 'solarized' look in photographic images, but this
>
>could be acceptable if you first convert your image/scan to grayscale (using
>
>PhotoShop or whatever) since the final will be monochrome anyway. Again, see
>
>if using GIF helps or hurts file size (since GIF uses an LZW compression
>
>scheme, too, which is the same method used for 'zipping' a file with
>
>WinZip).
>
>
>
>I can do final cropping and retouching on the image, so when it doubt, take
>
>it a little 'wide' to give me some swing room.
>
>
>
>My email system doesn't limit attachment sizes, and I have a full T-1 on my
>
>end, so the size of the file isn't an issue on my end.
>
>
>
>If you have any questions, technical or otherwise, please email me. Thanks
>
>in advance for any help with this.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

RE: [motm] Urgent Request for Gear Photos

2000-05-22 by Dave Bradley

I'll take one with my digital tonight, as a huge bmp. White separator strips
are currently off my modules, so it should look stock.

Dave Bradley
Principal Software Engineer
Engineering Animation, Inc.
daveb@...
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tkacs, Ken [mailto:ken.tkacs@...]
> Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 10:18 AM
> To: 'MOTM Forum All'
> Subject: [motm] Urgent Request for Gear Photos
>
>
>
> Calling all cars:
>
> We are currently putting together an advertisement for Synthesis
> Technology
> that will appear in several major music publications. The ad is laid out,
> but we need a really good photo of some modules to finish it up.
>
> This photo needs to be high resolution and we need it pretty much
> *tomorrow*
> to meet deadlines. If you are able to snap a good photo and get
> it into our
> hands in this timeframe, please let Paul and I know via private email.
>
> The photo needs to yell "MODULAR!" at a glance.
>
> It needs to be a fairly close shot of some modules, 2 rows high by five
> wide, roughly, is a good area to frame, but use your judgment. We would
> particularly like to highlight VCOs in the picture, if possible. A few
> patchcords would help show this system 'in action,' but not so many that
> they obscure the modules or cast too many complex & distracting shadows.
>
> The photo needs to be very high resolution, as the demands of print
> resolution are an order of magnitude greater than for web/CRT. Either a
> high-end digital camera, or a 35mm photo scanned at high resolution may do
> the job.
>
> (I myself have the use of a pretty nice digital camera, but still find it
> difficult to take a clear shot of these modules because of the contrast
> between the small, fine white writing on the overwhelmingly black
> panels...
> the tricky contrast and lighting conditions wreak havoc with the camera's
> pickup, apparently.)
>
> If sending the photo electronically, it needs to be uncompressed, or at
> least compressed with a non-lossy compression scheme. This means no JPeG
> files. TIFF is ideal, and TIFF using LZW compression is fine, too (LZW is
> non-lossy, but you may find that it doesn't help photographic images much,
> and sometimes makes them bigger... if you can, try both ways and see which
> is smallest, but *quality* is the chief concern here). GIF files
> also use a
> non-lossy compression scheme, but are limited to 256 colors/shades. Now,
> normally that causes a 'solarized' look in photographic images, but this
> could be acceptable if you first convert your image/scan to
> grayscale (using
> PhotoShop or whatever) since the final will be monochrome anyway.
> Again, see
> if using GIF helps or hurts file size (since GIF uses an LZW compression
> scheme, too, which is the same method used for 'zipping' a file with
> WinZip).
>
> I can do final cropping and retouching on the image, so when it
> doubt, take
> it a little 'wide' to give me some swing room.
>
> My email system doesn't limit attachment sizes, and I have a full
> T-1 on my
> end, so the size of the file isn't an issue on my end.
>
> If you have any questions, technical or otherwise, please email me. Thanks
> in advance for any help with this.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Now the best and coolest websites come right to you based on your
> unique interests. eTour.com is surfing without searching.
> And, it's FREE!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3013/5/_/529958/_/959009203/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.