Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by fdoddy@aol.com
I think Marty, John and the crew are doing exactly what they want to. They are concentrating on what they do best. It s that simple, really fritz...doing what
Messages
Browse messages
Page 161 of 376 · 18798 messages matched
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
Computer science occurres when you poor acid on a computer and it turns into a pile of salt. In a message dated 1/21/2011 8:56:53 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by fdoddy@aol.com
Computer Science...hmm. Isn t that an oxymoron like jumbo shrimp , military intelligence , Congressional Ethics ? fd ... From: lsf5275
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by Chris Dale
Well I think it depends. I ve been able to tell the real thing apart from samples, but deeper in the mix - yes it s pretty difficult. Also - I imagine most
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by Pomeroy RH Ranch
You have no idea how funny that is............
Re: [newmellotrongroup] OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by mainpsych
It looks like a chopped 400/MkVI. Nice. Elegant. All of the above. Standard size wooden keys, no adjustment screws, programmable parameters, Easy to carry.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
No, Vance or Vince is no bother. Lance is no bother either. Lince would be a bother. That name would annoy the shit out of me. In a message dated 1/20/2011
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by Pomeroy RH Ranch
Frank - How about all those Lance s and Vince s.......sheesh! Vance
RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by Gary Brumm
An Alesis piano module would never be mistaken for a Steinway where as this instrument would be difficult if not impossible to distinguish from a tape machine
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by tronbros
Because it s irrelevant. M mellotronics.co.uk
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by David Jacques
Dave Kean does... I have seen the official trademark documentation.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
Doesn t everyone love it when Dr. Tony talks in scientific terms? I love learning stuff. In a message dated 1/20/2011 7:50:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
Now THAT is SCIENCE at its FINEST! In a message dated 1/20/2011 7:22:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, ... (http://umbla.com/free-games-play-online-flash-225.php)
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
Let me go back over old posts... I m not sure that is entirely true. In a message dated 1/20/2011 7:06:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tronbros@aol.com writes:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
No one does snarky better than Mattias! . This is a silly pissing match that only benefits all of us who enjoy watching car crashes and and videos of children
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
No, what you meant was, Sorry about the H. You know what annoys me? The extra T in Matthew. I mean, I know why it should be there, but it s very presence is
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by lsf5275@aol.com
It was a joke Mattias... Not mine, of course. My jokes are far funnier. In a message dated 1/20/2011 6:29:01 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by trawnajim
... Not quite Tom. Here s my contribution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-lqA1-bSS4 Jim Bailey
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by Rick Blechta
... Oh come on! We could all hear the tears in your words... ;)
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-21 by mattias
Its nothing emotional. Its a simple question. Who owns the right to manufacture instruments under the name Mellotron ? // Mattias
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
Sir Arthur Pottle mellotronics.co.uk
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Tony
My equipment is meant for my sole entainment. Plenty of Mellotrons were toured and treasured, despite minor problems. Trust me as a Ph.D. in Computer Science,
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
Stop getting so emotional! We aren t concerned about the name or the product. Truly. We build mellotrons and have no intention of entering the digital
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mattias
But who owns the right to the name Mellotron ?
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mattias
As far as I know..The first batch is sold out and there is a waiting list for the next one. Probably because it is clumsy and flawed, as a product and how it
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
Sorry about the extra H. M mellotronics.co.uk
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
Matthias, the ownership of the much celebrated, often emulated but never copied Mellotron trademark has never, ever had a bearing on anything. Most people
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mattias
Digital control is fine, but for sound generation, count me out. ...and for international touring ?
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mattias
Ha ha ! Great Comment ! Because Streetly owns the right to the name Mellotron right ?
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
But where does that leave his distributors? If he can undermine their margin by direct transaction, the results are obvious. A commercial disaster. Arse, M
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Bruce Daily
And, they re polyphonic farts! Just click on several, and they will quickly get backed up. Painful! Such clever inernet-types! -Dr Flateu le
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Tony
I wouldn t own one. Digital control is fine, but for sound generation, count me out. Besides I m a loyal Streetly fan! Tony #510 and 2 more Black Beasts
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
Look who s up late! Perhaps it s Big City Music that is capitalizing on the interest, not Markus. I wonder. Maybe ordering directly from him is less costly.
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
I agree, it s not a mellotron and I/we aren t bothered about the product just like Steinway don t care about an Alesis piano module. Raising the price prior
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
With all respect, Martin, until you can put them side by side and compare them it would be hard to dispute that Markus digital machine is better than the
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
More orders than Markus can fill. In a word... Interest. In a message dated 1/20/2011 3:52:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, charel196@yahoo.com writes: so the
RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by John Wright
I thought the US$500.00 increase was royalty payments to the UK for use of the name. 8-) ________________________________ From:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by tronbros
Cock up on the abacus front. Now only 200US below the Memotron. Justice for the arrogance of calling it the M4000D! M mellotronics.co.uk
Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Charles
so the M4000D has gone from $1995 to $2495....what can justify this price jump in such a short time frame?
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
Oh Goddd!!!!! hours of fun ahead. In a message dated 1/20/2011 2:55:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, tomdcour@amnh.org writes: Here are all the fart sounds
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Thomas C. Doncourt
Here are all the fart sounds anyone could need http://umbla.com/free-games-play-online-flash-225.php ... Ahhh yes, the fart sound. Always an ice breaker at any
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
Ahhh yes, the fart sound. Always an ice breaker at any occassion. In a message dated 1/20/2011 2:10:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, pocotron@yahoo.com writes:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Bruce Daily
Stupid youthful humor. I bet his favorite sound is the moog fart. -Bruce D. ... From: lsf5275@aol.com Subject: Re:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
How does it look up close, Frank? Did you get to see inside the lid or examine it.. wiggle the keys or pick it up and shake it? In a message dated 1/20/2011
Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by lsf5275@aol.com
What an asshole! Mickey, I hope that wasn t you. In a message dated 1/20/2011 11:42:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, mickey___mouse___@hotmail.com writes:
Re: [newmellotrongroup] OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mainpsych
Yeah, the 4000D was there, but Markus wasn t. Someone from Big City Music was trying to demo it (along with his 400), but I seemed to know more about it than
Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by mettalliccasucks
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePurityControl#p/u/0/-z9XG1m8Rco
Re: OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by Charles
it was there at the Big City Music booth (there s a Youtube video) but in the video it wasn t turned on.
OT- NAMM 2011
2011-01-20 by johnm400s911
Just wondering, now that NAMM 2011 is over, any list members attend? Was the M4000D there and demonstrated? Best, John #911
OT - good lyrics here - Rock n Roll Nerd
2011-01-14 by ClayE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2De680f8r-c