Hi Tony, Yeh I was very disappointed to figure that out and have been hoping I was wrong. So it's good to have the confirmation because I don't want to make my program any more complex than it needs to be. James --- Tony Cappellini <tony@...> wrote: > > you're right. > I've just looked in the midi spec- negative numbers > aren't supported by the > "quick patch" edit method. > > At 01:46 AM 07/17/05, you wrote: > >I would sure like to know how you were able to > manage > >that. Can you send me the SysEx strings you used > for > >the negative parameters? I am basing my information > >purely on observing the Midi data being sent to my > 6R > >from Opcode Edit One program. > > > >James > > > >--- Tony Cappellini <tony@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > At 06:20 PM 07/15/05, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>However there are other parameters that > require > > > a > > > > >>bigger message of 274 bytes, and essentially > > > that is > > > > >>the whole patch being sent just to change > one > > > > >>parameter i.e.. -63 - +63. At least that is > what > > > > > > > > > This doesn't make sense. You should be able to > edit > > > any parameter using a > > > sysex string, which is about 7-10 bytes. > > > I was able to do this when I had my 6R. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [oberheim] Hardware editor for Matrix 1000
2005-07-17 by james
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.