OBERHEIM SYNTH

Check if you get any changes by editing velocity sensitivity etc pages 68, 89, 70 of the user manual, also check VCA settings page 115





________________________________
 From: Martin Ator <cyllall@...>
To: "oberheim@yahoogroups.com" <oberheim@yahoogroups.com> 
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 20:54
Subject: Re: [oberheim] trying to diagnose generall weakness of my matrix 12
 

  
Have you got it set up to control volume using pedals instead? Somethings not quite right. It shouldn't be that quiet. I don't know if the volume is microprocessor controlled? Maybe some parts of the volume control circuitry have gone awry. Is it the same for all patches I take it? Has this been modded for individual output jacks, if so are these working OK?  

Try not to do any hot swapping. Power down before plugging any jacks in/out.

Your Juno works fine with your audio interface? No -10db, 0db, +4dB switches switched to the wrong thin anywhere?

The answer could be something simple and because it's passing audio it might not be a very big problem to fix.

What's the history of this Matrix 12, was it working fine at one stage?


Martin



________________________________
 From: Loveslap! Recordings <loveslap@...>
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 19:48
Subject: Re: [oberheim] trying to diagnose generall weakness of my matrix 12
 

  
I turned the juno way down to match the maximum volume of the matrix.




On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Peter Mörck <peter@...> wrote:

 
>  
> 
>Perhaps turning the volume up helps? 
:P
>I could barely even see the waveforms in Audacity 
at normal zoom level.
>Is your mixer/soundcard healthy?
>Those waveforms look terrible, both the Juno and 
the Matrix ones.
>Like synced or something...
>Turn the volume up and try bypassing any mixers if 
there was any.
>This recording just seemed strange.
> 
>BR,
>Peter
> 
> 
>----- Original Message ----- 
>>From: Loveslap!  Recordings 
>>To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:54  AM
>>Subject: Re: [oberheim] trying to  diagnose generall weakness of my matrix 12
>>
>>  
>>sanity check: 
>>http://www.sendspace.com/file/f8slzb
>>
>>right 
  channel is Juno106
>>left channel is matrix 12
>>
>>both are single saw 
  waves (no sub osc on the juno, only one osc used on the matrix)
>>filter is 
  wide open
>>resonance is at 0
>>all modulation is off
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Loveslap! Recordings <loveslap@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>i will  post an audio example for sanity check purposes.  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Paul Cunningham <paul@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>I find that Oberheims (from the Matrix era) are awesome for complex  textures and realtime modulation, and while they do (and should) have a  respectable low-end, they are not heavy-handed. You can still get some big  lows though using the triangle waveform and a bit of resonance like you  said. Most of the sound is in those CEM chips and each Oberheim I've heard  sounds unique. I have four Matrix-1000s and each one is a little bit  different, but they sound amazing all together.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They are unlike other hybrid synths in the sense that there is a  little of "play" in the settings and that this, when combined with the  modulation matrix, add up to something more like a single board modular  synthesizer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I have no idea about the factory programs for the Matrix-12, but a  pair of Matrix-1000s playing the same patch, one panned left and the other  right, sounds tremendous! It's a subtle thing, but I expect that you can  get some amazing imagery using the same approach. -pc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:58 AM, oberhomie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>>Hello
>>>>>
>>>>>I have a Matrix 12 (Voice 1.4) (Main Software 
        1.1)
>>>>>
>>>>>I like it but when I listen to online samples they sound 
        much better..
>>>>>
>>>>>Mine seems to lack "balls".. I have no trouble with 
        any tuning.
>>>>>But my low end doesn't seem to be there and many of the 
        factory presets don't really impress.
>>>>>
>>>>>Once thing I've noticed is 
        that when I adjust the VCF resonance, there is a HUGE difference between 
        62, and 63.. in fact resonance=63 is the only time the synth grows a 
        pair... 0-62 is wimpy, 63 is burly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this normal?
>>>>>
>>>>>I 
        really want to get this thing sounding 
      good!!!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Loveslap Recordings
>>>http://www.loveslap.com
>>>
>>>Galaxy Group - Ease Back 
    (w/ BSC and 1200 Warriors Remixes)
>>>http://www.traxsource.com/index.php?act=show&fc=tpage&cr=titles&cv=33653&alias=downloads
>>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>Loveslap Recordings
>>http://www.loveslap.com
>>
>>Galaxy Group - Ease Back (w/ 
  BSC and 1200 Warriors Remixes)
>>http://www.traxsource.com/index.php?act=show&fc=tpage&cr=titles&cv=33653&alias=downloads
>>


-- 
Loveslap Recordings
http://www.loveslap.com

Galaxy Group - Ease Back (w/ BSC and 1200 Warriors Remixes)
http://www.traxsource.com/index.php?act=show&fc=tpage&cr=titles&cv=33653&alias=downloads