OBERHEIM SYNTH

Definitely 6R!! 
You can get all Mx1000 programs on the internet, and you can load them via Midi.
Also you can do split/layer with 6R!!!!
Only thing that it has 127 RAM  program places less than Mx1000.(only drawback).
Anyway, I'll go with 6R...

Alen

--- On Wed, 4/14/10, ogusa@... <ogusa@...> wrote:

From: ogusa@... <ogusa@...>
Subject: Re: [oberheim] Help me with a Matrix 100 vs. 6R decision...
To: oberheim@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2010, 5:49 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      Gee the M1000 is only one rack space.



That said, if you can spare the rack space keep the 6R.  

Bi-timbral/separate outs/front panel editing  is definitely better.



I have a M1000 because I can't spare the extra rack spaces.



Only 2 banks of the M1000 are editable, the rest are ROM, though I  

just use sysex to tweak the ROM sounds as I go.



Stublito



Quoting bob_at_work_ 2000 <tttsystems@earthlin k.net>:



> Hi group.  I recently purchased an Oberheim 1000 and a 6R, listened   

> to both and like what I hear, but think I only have room for one of   

> these babies....decisions , decisions.  Here is what I am   

> weighing.... 1000 presets, editable via software in mono before   

> external effects or 100 presets, editable via front panel or   

> software, in possibly stereo or layered, but limited to 4/2 or 3/3?   

> voice division.  Sonically, the units seem the same although I have   

> not tried an apples with apples voice comparison.. ..so what are your  

>  thoughts on which I should keep?

>

> Bob

> El Segundo, CA

>

>

>

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>

>