I agree actually, I think in a few years we'll see a revival of NV-VSTi's (non-virtual VSTi's). Even if it means that they simply package the VSTi's into hardware controllers (which basically what a VA is now). See, manufacturer's didn't learn this lesson the firs time around, which was only a few years ago ironically enough. At the time all of analog keyboards started to lose favor with people looking for "more portable" and "easier to store presets" in a synth. So we got a bunch of menu driven synths that while maybe more powerful, we're ultimately less fun to program (arguably of course). So you see this big influx of keyboards recently with more knobs and less menu drive. The softsynth phenomenom is the same thing IMO. Yeah they sound really cool, and yeah they're easy to back up, but they're not much fun to PLAY and program unless you have a dedicated control surface for each one! Very few control surfaces built today can cope with more than VSTi template in a way that barely approaches elegance. And you have to have one with expensive endless rotaries to even stand a chance at decent workflow. rEalm In my opinion, the whole softsynth thing is a fad that will pass...eventually. The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s)or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Delivery of this message to any person other than the intended recipient(s) is not intended in any way to waive privilege or confidentiality. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of , or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. For Translation: http://www.baxter.com/email_disclaimer [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
softsynths a fad?
2004-05-10 by erik_magrini@Baxter.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.