thanks cosinezero (and also to rEalm). that helps a lot. i have experience with hardware seqs (used to use a kawai q80) so i'm hopeful that i will indeed get the hang of it fairly easily. i'm drawn to emu because i've had two of their samplers (an emax and an esi-32) and i find the way they typically organize menus and what not to be far more intuitive than other brands. they also have a reputation for having good filters, which i expect holds true for the xl/mp/px. (right?) i do plan on getting another cheap synth to expand my soundset but i think a command station would be a good (re)starting centerpiece/brain. now i just have to find one for sale :-\ thanks again, and hopefully i'll be back here posting and learning and contributing when i finally manage to track down one of these things. cheers, pulaski --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "cosine... zero" <cosinezero@y...> wrote: > > Lots to say here... > > > i've been out of the loop for a while as far as playing with > > electronic music making tools and want to get back into it with an > > all > > in one unit such as the the xl-7 or mp-7. i'm into making both > > straight up house/techno grooves as well as electronic infused indie > > rock, where i'd use the box for accompaniment to singing and > > strumming. > > -->It's pretty decent for sequencing house/techno, tho I'm not really > impressed with it's abilities for math-rock and the casio-esque > electroclash, etc. Most of those sort of bands rely heavily on synth > sounds, and while the xx-7s have some sounds in those vein, you'll get > bored quick as it's a rompler not a synthesizer - there's only so much > you can do with it. Don't get me wrong; there's lots of synth sounds in > here (esp if you buy extra roms) but I find an actual synth to be a lot > more flexible for that sort of music. > > i'm also interested in building up some more hardware in > > the future. i'd like feedback on how it does sequencing external gear > > (including user assignable knobs) as well as how it is as a sequencer > > in general (muting un muting tracks and does it allow on the fly > > composition). > > -->Personally, I find it excellent at sequencing my other gear. I use > it to sequence a jp8000 and a nord micromodular live, and it works > exceptionally well for that. It does allow on the fly composition - I > find it's more editable in realtime than most other hardware sequencers > I'm familiar with... and yes, it certainly allows mute/unmute of > tracks. The whole thing is pretty easy to get the hang of, and that's > saying a lot because there's really a lot to it. > > finally i'm not sure which soundset i'd like to start > > with. i think perhaps i'd like both, which means i'd get either one > > and then buy the rom for the one i'm missing. how many of you have > > done that? easy to install? thanks for any guidance you can give. > > -->I came into an MP7 and then just recently acquired the XL-7 and Beat > Garden ROMs. VERY easy to install (tho, I've done quite a bit of > computer upgrades). I've got some 3,000 samples now, and it's almost > too many. The sounds are pretty darned good - I'm really not too > disappointed for what I write (breaks/downtempo). I haven't found a > clean 909 or 808 soundset yet, so I'm not sure you'll be able to write > typical house tracks, but you definitely can write quite a bit of > atypical ones. > > I might recommend the XL7, but I might not recommend the MP7 ROM to > you. Maybe the Techno Synth Construction Yard, or the Vintage Synth ROM > might be more up your alley. > > Mine quickly has become a centerpiece of my live setup. > > > cosinezero > > > ===== > <A href="mailto:cosinezero@y...">cosinezero@y...</A> > <A href="http://www.defmatch.com">http://www.defmatch.com</A> > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more. > http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
Message
Re: xl-7 discovery questions
2005-01-04 by pulaski909
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.