The samples in the Pop ROM and the Composer ROM are identical. The presets are (subjectively) better on the Pop ROM, though there are half as many of them (4 banks instead of 8). I'd wholeheartedly recommend keeping the Pop ROM and skipping CMPSR. Vintage and Pop should have 0% overlap IIRC, the vintage was from mostly new stuff. I'd wholeheartedly recommend *getting* the Vintage - it's really good stuff. The DRUM ROM is extraordinarily good too, and is also all new samples. -Aaron --- Ronald Pieket <rpieket@...> wrote: > > So a little while ago I got my XL-7, with a bonus "Proteus Pop" > expansion. I've been looking at the other expansion ROMs, trying to > get as much info before I invest in any. > > I noticed that many of the instrument names in the "Composer" ROM are > the same as in my "Pop" ROM. Same with "Vintage" and "Pop". And > between the standard XL7 "Lead" ROM and "Pop", there are quite a few > duplicates. Can I assume that if an instrument has the same name, it > is exactly the same wave data? By comparing "Lead" and "Pop", which I > both have, this appears to be the case. > > It would seem that the "Pop" ROM is a compilation of instruments from > other collections. Are there any instruments that are unique to > "Pop"? > > I haven't done side-by-side comparisons between other ROMs, but how > common are duplicate instruments? > > I'm considering replacing my "Pop" with a "Composer". It appears that > all the instruments I like from the "Pop" are already in the "Lead" > or > are in the "Composer" ROM. By replacing "Pop" with "Composer", I > would > keep what I like, and get a few more unique instruments... > > -Ron. __________________________________ Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click. http://farechase.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [xl7] Expansion ROM overlap.
2005-11-11 by Aaron Eppolito
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.