Yahoo Groups archive

Emu XL-7 & MP-7 User's Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:09 UTC

Thread

Main outs question

Main outs question

2005-03-18 by mike

I'm getting a buzz (well, not me personally) from the main outs.  I thought I remember 
reading some posts on this quite a while ago about improving the ground for the main 
outs.  I tried searching the archives and good ol' Yahoo gives me a client server out of 
memory message.  I do remember some problem with the SPDIF out and maybe I'm getting 
the two confused.  Any ideas/suggestions?

Here's some specifics on the situation-

I replaced the outlet I'm plugging into and that helped quite a bit- noise was unbearable 
before that.

With my mixer plugged into the amp (no Emu) there's no buzzing.

I tried different 1/4" cables and it didn't help. 3' long between mixer and Emu, 10' long to 
amp.

Thanks!!
Mike

Re: [xl7] Main outs question

2005-03-18 by cosine... zero

A simple step is to put the instrument on the same exact power that the
mixer is; plug them in to the same power strip. Any differences in
potential between the grounds can cause a ground loop and "buzz" on the
audio lines. Studios that have lots of different surge suppressors
plugged in to different power circuits usually have a lot of noise this
way.

With an amp involved, same sort of problem. They should be as much on
the same power circuit as possible.

cosinezero


--- mike <mikedancy@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm getting a buzz (well, not me personally) from the main outs.  I
> thought I remember 
> reading some posts on this quite a while ago about improving the
> ground for the main 
> outs.  I tried searching the archives and good ol' Yahoo gives me a
> client server out of 
> memory message.  I do remember some problem with the SPDIF out and
> maybe I'm getting 
> the two confused.  Any ideas/suggestions?
> 
> Here's some specifics on the situation-
> 
> I replaced the outlet I'm plugging into and that helped quite a bit-
> noise was unbearable 
> before that.
> 
> With my mixer plugged into the amp (no Emu) there's no buzzing.
> 
> I tried different 1/4" cables and it didn't help. 3' long between
> mixer and Emu, 10' long to 
> amp.
> 
> Thanks!!
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> --------------------~--> 
> In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
> At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/c9hWNA/3MnJAA/n1hLAA/pWZylB/TM
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 

<A href="mailto:cosinezero@...">cosinezero@...</A>
<A href="http://www.defmatch.com">http://www.defmatch.com</A>


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo

Re: Main outs question

2005-03-18 by mike

Excellent point!  I do have everything on the same circuit.  The Emu and mixer are on the 
same power strip.  The amp is plugged into a different power strip which is plugged into 
the same outlet I'm on.

This whole set up is temporary.  I was asked to a timpani drum track for a song at church-
the death march.  The rheostats for the lighting are the source of the buzzing I'm sure, but 
I thought it was odd that only the Emu presents it.

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "cosine... zero" <cosinezero@y...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> A simple step is to put the instrument on the same exact power that the
> mixer is; plug them in to the same power strip. Any differences in
> potential between the grounds can cause a ground loop and "buzz" on the
> audio lines. Studios that have lots of different surge suppressors
> plugged in to different power circuits usually have a lot of noise this
> way.
> 
> With an amp involved, same sort of problem. They should be as much on
> the same power circuit as possible.
> 
> cosinezero
>

Re: [xl7] re: Main outs question

2005-03-19 by flibfree@worldnet.att.net

Hello all,
	There was a question about spdif noise a while back and I posed the 
possibility that it was perhaps a grounding issue.  At least one person found this 
to be true.  I grounded my spdif to the case and it is now dead silent.  However, 
the main outs and the phone jack seem to often have a buzz in them which is 
VERY annoying.  I've not found any fix for this that works.  I've started only using 
the spdif for the sound as a result.  It's possible that the mains also need to be 
grounded somehow, but I haven't tried to do that... 
	
	Hope that helps... Best,
					Flibfree ^=.=^

Re: [xl7] re: Main outs question

2005-03-19 by Greg Waltzer

I've found at times when there was excessive hum on my XL7 outputs, that 
a ground lifter solved it.

flibfree@... wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>Hello all,
>	There was a question about spdif noise a while back and I posed the 
>possibility that it was perhaps a grounding issue.  At least one person found this 
>to be true.  I grounded my spdif to the case and it is now dead silent.  However, 
>the main outs and the phone jack seem to often have a buzz in them which is 
>VERY annoying.  I've not found any fix for this that works.  I've started only using 
>the spdif for the sound as a result.  It's possible that the mains also need to be 
>grounded somehow, but I haven't tried to do that... 
>	
>	Hope that helps... Best,
>					Flibfree ^=.=^
>  
>

Re: Main outs question

2005-03-19 by mike

Thanks for the replies!!  I've considered looking into some type of groud loop isolater, but 
was hoping to avoid spending any cash.  i should be able to get by with this one-time 
deal.  The buzzing is slightly audible only when there's silence.  I blame it all on my wife- 
she's the one that goes to church and got me roped into this =p  Since I'm new at the 
sound game I thought it'd be good to know how to solve.  I am curious about adding a 
ground wire though.  It seems to make sense if it works for the spdif out.  I also got a 
reply from Emu that suggests loosening/tightening the bottom plate screws- some type of 
sheilding issue?  Have yet to try it.

Thanks again!!
Mike

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Greg Waltzer <egwaltzer@c...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I've found at times when there was excessive hum on my XL7 outputs, that 
> a ground lifter solved it.
> 
> flibfree@w... wrote:
> 
> >Hello all,
> >	There was a question about spdif noise a while back and I posed the 
> >possibility that it was perhaps a grounding issue.  At least one person found this 
> >to be true.  I grounded my spdif to the case and it is now dead silent.  However, 
> >the main outs and the phone jack seem to often have a buzz in them which is 
> >VERY annoying.  I've not found any fix for this that works.  I've started only using 
> >the spdif for the sound as a result.  It's possible that the mains also need to be 
> >grounded somehow, but I haven't tried to do that... 
> >	
> >	Hope that helps... Best,
> >					Flibfree ^=.=^
> >  
> >

MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by Cornell

What's up everyone? I have a question. I've had my wonderful mp7 for nearly four years. I have made some really hot stuff with this bad boy since I bought it. My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use? I've recently been checking them out and I have found one that I would love to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these samples are free to use however one may see fit. Thanks in advance for all responses.

Brotha Cee

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by vibesart

You could not copyright the music - because you did not write it - and
that means that you could not release it commercially. The tunes that
exist in ROM are to demonstrate the MP7's sounds in use. Federal law
even prohibits transfer of authorship from one party to another (even
if the composer wants it that way). Use the MP7 tune as inspiration to
write something that is uniquely yours - and then you are free.

--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Cornell <brothacee@y...> wrote:
> 
> My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use?
I've >recently been checking them out and I have found one that I
would love >to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these
samples are >free to use however one may see fit. 





> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

I disagree with pretty much everything vibesart has said. Except his last point that if you do it all yourself you are totally free.

One should take a look at www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples take a look at http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm

AFAIK, you are licensed to use the preset patterns in the machines you buy. Roland says this in the preamble to their groovebox manuals. I bet Emu/Creattive takes this same position.

In general on can HAVE a copyright on any new work even though you may be using elements of other's work (the key is that you have permission to do so-- which in this case I believe you do). This is done all the time, in fact there are specific provisions dealing with having new copyright based on a new combination of previous works, etc. The main thing is you have permission, also called license, to use any elements, whether major or minor inside your otherwise new original composition, which you certainly have copyright to.

Also the statement that you cannot release commercially that which you do not have a copyright on is not correct. You can release something you do not have a copyright on, if

    a) the holder of the copyright(s) says you can, (like a sample of a released recording),

    b) you have a right to release but pay royalties (wsuch as your right to *cover* another's song but pay royalties on your sales) or

    c) there is *no* holder of copyright, you or anyone else (i.e. releasing a nice Bach tune).

So the only time you cannot *legally* release commercially that which you do not have a copyright on occurs when you release samples or recording of other's master recordings where they do not give you permission. Covering a track (i.e. rerecording a beatles tune) is okay, but you will owe royalties after the fact.

I do not know what federal law (which country also) prohibits the transfer of rights. This is done as a matter of business ALL the time. For example I hire you to help me produce some hip hop. We sign an agreement by which I agree to pay you in return for you agreeing that any artistic elements that arise while you are on the job in my studio are MINE as a work for hire. Viola, you have just transfered your rights. Called a "work for hire". You can even sell away any right to have a credit.

Another example is when I sell someone a song, I sign a contract and give you whatever I please to give you in exchange for money or something else of value.

Movie studio's buy and sell the rights and coprights to scripts and soundtracks like squares on a monopoly board as a matter of daily business.

So, the bottom line is, if you need legal advice, do not trust what you hear on a maillist (even what I have said here). Check

www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples take a look at http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm

and go talk to an entertainment or intellectual property attorney.

Ravi Ivan Sharma

Original Message ----- 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  From: vibesart 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:04 PM
  Subject: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples


  You could not copyright the music - because you did not write it - and
  that means that you could not release it commercially. The tunes that
  exist in ROM are to demonstrate the MP7's sounds in use. Federal law
  even prohibits transfer of authorship from one party to another (even
  if the composer wants it that way). Use the MP7 tune as inspiration to
  write something that is uniquely yours - and then you are free.

  --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Cornell <brothacee@y...> wrote:
  > 
  > My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use?
  I've >recently been checking them out and I have found one that I
  would love >to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these
  samples are >free to use however one may see fit. 





  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

Sorry, not all correct. Better form of online information regarding copyright in the US and a lot of other places is here:

http://www.copyright.gov/
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: vibesart 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:04 PM
  Subject: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples


  You could not copyright the music - because you did not write it - and
  that means that you could not release it commercially. The tunes that
  exist in ROM are to demonstrate the MP7's sounds in use. Federal law
  even prohibits transfer of authorship from one party to another (even
  if the composer wants it that way). Use the MP7 tune as inspiration to
  write something that is uniquely yours - and then you are free.

  --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Cornell <brothacee@y...> wrote:
  > 
  > My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use?
  I've >recently been checking them out and I have found one that I
  would love >to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these
  samples are >free to use however one may see fit. 





  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

The link to www.uspto.gov is not the most direct way to get info on copyright in the U.S. check here instead,

http://www.copyright.gov/
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ravi Ivan Sharma 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 1:44 PM
  Subject: Re: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples


  I disagree with pretty much everything vibesart has said. Except his last point that if you do it all yourself you are totally free.

  One should take a look at www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples take a look at http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm

  AFAIK, you are licensed to use the preset patterns in the machines you buy. Roland says this in the preamble to their groovebox manuals. I bet Emu/Creattive takes this same position.

  In general on can HAVE a copyright on any new work even though you may be using elements of other's work (the key is that you have permission to do so-- which in this case I believe you do). This is done all the time, in fact there are specific provisions dealing with having new copyright based on a new combination of previous works, etc. The main thing is you have permission, also called license, to use any elements, whether major or minor inside your otherwise new original composition, which you certainly have copyright to.

  Also the statement that you cannot release commercially that which you do not have a copyright on is not correct. You can release something you do not have a copyright on, if

      a) the holder of the copyright(s) says you can, (like a sample of a released recording),

      b) you have a right to release but pay royalties (wsuch as your right to *cover* another's song but pay royalties on your sales) or

      c) there is *no* holder of copyright, you or anyone else (i.e. releasing a nice Bach tune).

  So the only time you cannot *legally* release commercially that which you do not have a copyright on occurs when you release samples or recording of other's master recordings where they do not give you permission. Covering a track (i.e. rerecording a beatles tune) is okay, but you will owe royalties after the fact.

  I do not know what federal law (which country also) prohibits the transfer of rights. This is done as a matter of business ALL the time. For example I hire you to help me produce some hip hop. We sign an agreement by which I agree to pay you in return for you agreeing that any artistic elements that arise while you are on the job in my studio are MINE as a work for hire. Viola, you have just transfered your rights. Called a "work for hire". You can even sell away any right to have a credit.

  Another example is when I sell someone a song, I sign a contract and give you whatever I please to give you in exchange for money or something else of value.

  Movie studio's buy and sell the rights and coprights to scripts and soundtracks like squares on a monopoly board as a matter of daily business.

  So, the bottom line is, if you need legal advice, do not trust what you hear on a maillist (even what I have said here). Check

  www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples take a look at http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm

  and go talk to an entertainment or intellectual property attorney.

  Ravi Ivan Sharma

  Original Message ----- 
    From: vibesart 
    To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
    Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:04 PM
    Subject: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples


    You could not copyright the music - because you did not write it - and
    that means that you could not release it commercially. The tunes that
    exist in ROM are to demonstrate the MP7's sounds in use. Federal law
    even prohibits transfer of authorship from one party to another (even
    if the composer wants it that way). Use the MP7 tune as inspiration to
    write something that is uniquely yours - and then you are free.

    --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Cornell <brothacee@y...> wrote:
    > 
    > My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use?
    I've >recently been checking them out and I have found one that I
    would love >to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these
    samples are >free to use however one may see fit. 





    > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Yahoo! Groups Links

      a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
        
      b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        
      c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by vibesart

You are talking about a lot of detail here Ravi, which in certain
cases such as you describe is probably true. However these situations
can be complex, and the simple question posted here was: 

>sample songs on the mp7 free to use?

Key Word here being Songs - not fragments, not elements, not patterns
- full blown composition, and that is different.

There is indeed a law regarding Authorship - i.e. being the composer -
which is not legally transferable. ASCAP and BMI can provide detail on
that. This is even true in the movie biz, where certain composers have
ghost writers - the detail behind the scenes is that those ghosters
can and do register their works (I have done it many times) - and they
do get paid royalties and mechanicals as the case may be - even if it
is work for hire and otherwise anonymous in the credits.

Even in originally non-documented situations (usually bands) where key
individuals did not write the changes or lyrics but did (for ex)
create the bass line or other substantial written parts of an
arrangement, so much that it is deemed to be composition - many times
those individuals are succesful in taking the case to court and
winning settlements based on that.

> Movie studio's buy and sell the rights and coprights to scripts and
>soundtracks like squares on a monopoly board as a matter of daily
>business.

The movie studio or whomever does indeed own the publishing and the
rights - but they do not own authorship. John Williams does not own
the publishing to any of his music - it is all work for hire - but he
does own authorship and he does get paid performance roylaties as the
works are used in the commercial marketplace.

The other detailed examples that you mention - getting permission,
license etc - including the many license-free loop collections being
created and sold these days - i.e. Roland, etc - true, and I think it
can be assumed (altho I am guessing) that E-mu's Patterns can
~probably~ be used licence-free to create new works. I cannot speak
for E-mu however, and I have never seen any statements that E-mu has
made concerning this subject.

Bottom line is that it can be a very complex situation that is many
times not Black and White, which means that this statement:

>and go talk to an entertainment or intellectual property attorney

Is good advice.

Happy Toning

EM


--- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Ivan Sharma" <sharmalaw1@h...> wrote:
> I disagree with pretty much everything vibesart has said. Except his
last point that if you do it all yourself you are totally free.
> 
> One should take a look at www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples
take a look at http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm
> 
> AFAIK, you are licensed to use the preset patterns in the machines
you buy. Roland says this in the preamble to their groovebox manuals.
I bet Emu/Creattive takes this same position.
> 
> In general on can HAVE a copyright on any new work even though you
may be using elements of other's work (the key is that you have
permission to do so-- which in this case I believe you do). This is
done all the time, in fact there are specific provisions dealing with
having new copyright based on a new combination of previous works,
etc. The main thing is you have permission, also called license, to
use any elements, whether major or minor inside your otherwise new
original composition, which you certainly have copyright to.
> 
> Also the statement that you cannot release commercially that which
you do not have a copyright on is not correct. You can release
something you do not have a copyright on, if
> 
>     a) the holder of the copyright(s) says you can, (like a sample
of a released recording),
> 
>     b) you have a right to release but pay royalties (wsuch as your
right to *cover* another's song but pay royalties on your sales) or
> 
>     c) there is *no* holder of copyright, you or anyone else (i.e.
releasing a nice Bach tune).
> 
> So the only time you cannot *legally* release commercially that
which you do not have a copyright on occurs when you release samples
or recording of other's master recordings where they do not give you
permission. Covering a track (i.e. rerecording a beatles tune) is
okay, but you will owe royalties after the fact.
> 
> I do not know what federal law (which country also) prohibits the
transfer of rights. This is done as a matter of business ALL the time.
For example I hire you to help me produce some hip hop. We sign an
agreement by which I agree to pay you in return for you agreeing that
any artistic elements that arise while you are on the job in my studio
are MINE as a work for hire. Viola, you have just transfered your
rights. Called a "work for hire". You can even sell away any right to
have a credit.
> 
> Another example is when I sell someone a song, I sign a contract and
give you whatever I please to give you in exchange for money or
something else of value.
> 
> Movie studio's buy and sell the rights and coprights to scripts and
soundtracks like squares on a monopoly board as a matter of daily
business.
> 
> So, the bottom line is, if you need legal advice, do not trust what
you hear on a maillist (even what I have said here). Check
> 
> www.uspto.gov faq sections and for samples take a look at
http://www.low-life.fsnet.co.uk/copyright/index.htm
> 
> and go talk to an entertainment or intellectual property attorney.
> 
> Ravi Ivan Sharma
> 
> Original Message ----- 
>   From: vibesart 
>   To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
>   Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 12:04 PM
>   Subject: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples
> 
> 
>   You could not copyright the music - because you did not write it - and
>   that means that you could not release it commercially. The tunes that
>   exist in ROM are to demonstrate the MP7's sounds in use. Federal law
>   even prohibits transfer of authorship from one party to another (even
>   if the composer wants it that way). Use the MP7 tune as inspiration to
>   write something that is uniquely yours - and then you are free.
> 
>   --- In xl7@yahoogroups.com, Cornell <brothacee@y...> wrote:
>   > 
>   > My question is this. Are the sample songs on the mp7 free to use?
>   I've >recently been checking them out and I have found one that I
>   would love >to put some lyrics to but I want to make sure that these
>   samples are >free to use however one may see fit. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
>     a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xl7/
>       
>     b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     xl7-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>       
>     c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service. 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples

2005-06-12 by Ravi Ivan Sharma

Every deal can be different. There can be work for hire agreements that take away authorship as well. Only those employees in such situations can carve out exceptions to the general "work for hire" arrangement in which is *everything,* including authorship, is the empoyers.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: vibesart 
  To: xl7@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 3:10 PM
  Subject: [xl7] Re: MP7 Samples


  The movie studio or whomever does indeed own the publishing and the
  rights - but they do not own authorship. John Williams does not own
  the publishing to any of his music - it is all work for hire - but he
  does own authorship and he does get paid performance roylaties as the
  works are used in the commercial marketplace.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.