Hi Matt, I should have been more clear. I am assuming the digital boards of both the Xpander and the M12 are the same. I really don't know if they are, but if so, it would seem you could take a set of coppied ROMs from an M12 and put them into an Xpander. Giving the Xpander the Modulation list page. However since the M12 roms never supported the 6 CV/gate inputs they would not exsist to the firmware. On th M12, the modulation page gives you a list of all 20 modulation routings. You can change the amount or the destination. I find it most useful to delete unused ones when I need more for some reason. But there is a bug. If you access the modulation page, for some reason it turns off any quantization you may have set up. Best Regards Karl ________________________________ From: vrazomatt <vrazomatt@...> To: xpantastic@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thu, August 4, 2011 10:56:27 AM Subject: [xpantastic] Re: Why no Xpander mod. matrix implementation? >Karl, >I presume you are talking about the 6 cv/gate inputs (not the CV pedal inputs, >which I assume the M12 has as well)? If so, there is no direct CV-as-mod-source >ability now, so I'm not sure why this would have to be addressed in the >mod-matrix? >From my understanding, the mod matrix is just a compendium of all mod routings, >addressed though the already existing "misc" page, so no additional coding would > >be necessary. >Anyways, I guess this is all just academic unless someone feels like writing >something up!:) > > Am 04.08.2011 08:59, schrieb Karl Schmeer: > > > > So if even if someone copied > > the ROMs from an M12 and was successful in getting it to work in an > > Xpander. you would still lose the > > code to control the CV inputs. > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > Karl > > >
Message
Re: [xpantastic] Re: Why no Xpander mod. matrix implementation?
2011-08-04 by Karl Schmeer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.