Xpantastic!

I think, it is a well designed, relatively intuitive to use and reliable 
machine as it is.
I never needed the mod-matrix display of a Matrix-12 in my Xpander since 
I buyed it in the late 80th because I was able to remember the 
modulations during programming,- and there are the ears too.
These machines aren�t made to do everything w/ the eyes and if someone 
wants that, there are the computers and editor applications.

I�ve found the detune page much more important for quick work w/ the 
Matrix 12,- and I would never give up the CV inputs for some 
visualization as long there�s other CV gear existing in the arsenal.

PeWe

Am 05.08.2011 01:02, schrieb Karl Schmeer:
>
>
> Still not an easy job though :-)
>
> __________________
> From: Tony Cappellini <cappy2112@... <mailto:cappy2112%40gmail.com>>
> To: xpantastic@yahoogroups.com <mailto:xpantastic%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, August 4, 2011 9:08:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [xpantastic] Why no Xpander mod. matrix implementation?
>
>
>
> I would easily give up the CV inputs for the Matrix Mod display
>
> 
>