Yahoo Groups archive

68300

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:01 UTC

Message

Re: 68332-SDRAM interface

2003-04-08 by shyam_mali

Hi Jeff,

Can you comment on this design, I happened to see this site after i
read your message.
http://www.users.qwest.net/~kmaxon/page/cont/cont47.htm . The need for
interfacing large chunks of memory to use the full features of
microcontrollers like the 332 is apparent and universal. 

Shyam












--- In 68300@yahoogroups.com, jeffrey.tenney@g... wrote:
> 
> Shyam,
> 
> I don't think you'll get many responses on using SDRAM with a 68xxx.
 These
> processors have asynchronous external buses.  The conversion
hardware and
> logic would be complex.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "shyam_mali" <shyam_mali@y...> on 04/08/2003 07:22:33 AM
> 
> Please respond to 68300@yahoogroups.com
> 
> To:    68300@yahoogroups.com
> cc:
> Subject:    [68300] Re: 68332-SDRAM interface
> 
> 
> Charles,
> Yes, I am looking for advise on the feasibility and information of
> interfacing the DIMM modules used in the PC. Kindly advise.
> Shyam
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In 68300@yahoogroups.com, Melear Charles-rdph40
> <charles.melear@m...> wrote:
> > Shyam,
> >
> > Do you mean that you want to put Synchronous DRAM, like the kind
> used in PC's and stuff?
> >
> > The MC68332 was not particularly designed to deal with DRAM.
> >
> > Before we start walking down this road, I wanted to make sure that
> you are talking about DRAM that plugs into the motherboards of PC's.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Charlie
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: shyam_mali [mailto:shyam_mali@y...]
> > Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 8:57 PM
> > To: 68300@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [68300] 68332-SDRAM interface
> >
> >
> > Hi Charles, Robert
> >
> > Thanks for the assurance, i am keen on starting this project.
> > To start with the 332, i feel that it might be very helpful to have
> > an off-the-shelf 168-pin SDRAM module interface as a building block
> > for future applications.
> > I will appreciate suggestions regarding this interface... has anyone
> > tried it yet? What is the most logical way to go about achieving the
> > requirement? Are there any latches/buffers that support level
> > shifing? i will need these anyways to interface with the 64-bit wide
> > bus from the DIMM modules.
> >
> > Shyam
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> > ADVERTISEMENT
> >
> <
>
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=245454.3115308.4434529.1728375/D=egroupweb/S=1706554205:HM/A=1457554/R=0/*http://ipunda.com/clk/beibunmaisuiyuiwabei
> >
> 
> >
> <
>
http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=245454.3115308.4434529.1728375/D=egroupmail/S
> =:HM/A=1457554/rand=789845105
> >
> 
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > 68300-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > To learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
> > http://www.motorola.com/mcu <http://www.motorola.com/mcu>
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> 68300-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> 
> To learn more about Motorola Microcontrollers, please visit
> http://www.motorola.com/mcu
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.