Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 244 of 307 · 15341 messages matched
2005-01-16 by John Samperi
At 05:05 AM 17/01/2005, you wrote: >Am running v4.11 of studio and receiving assembler error message syntax >error ' What is this telling me since there are no "carot ( Thanks You may want to select version 1 assembler as your default. Studio 4.11 uses version 2 assembler as the
2005-01-16 by soran6221
Do you have problem in the implementation of MICROCONTROLLERS in your Automation Systems? We are MICROCONTROLLER specialists and ready to support you in your projects! PHYTEC - Microcontroller and more... We produce: MICROCONTROLLER MODULES IMAGE PROCESSING and VIDEO TECHNOLOGIES
2005-01-16 by Dennis Kazar
Am running v4.11 of studio and receiving assembler error message syntax error ' What is this telling me since there are no "carot ( Thanks D
2005-01-16 by Robert Adsett
At 08:56 AM 1/16/05 -0700, you wrote: >We are working up a Mega128 based board that will have both 5V and 3V >parts. The 128 will run at 5V. Anyone have suggestions for converting the >5V logic levels to/from the 128 to the 3V levels needed for some of the >other components. Spac
2005-01-16 by upand_at_them
Jameco has a 74ALVC164245 level translator. Mike --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Jim White wrote: > We are working up a Mega128 based board that will have both 5V and 3V > parts. The 128 will run at 5V. Anyone have suggestions for converting the > 5V logic levels to/from the 128
2005-01-16 by Valerij Avrealij
Hi, Jim. You wrote: > We are working up a Mega128 based board that will have both 5V and 3V > parts. The 128 will run at 5V. Anyone have suggestions for converting the > 5V logic levels to/from the 128 to the 3V levels needed for some of the > other components. Space is at a prem
2005-01-16 by Jim White
We are working up a Mega128 based board that will have both 5V and 3V parts. The 128 will run at 5V. Anyone have suggestions for converting the 5V logic levels to/from the 128 to the 3V levels needed for some of the other components. Space is at a premium. Jim
2005-01-16 by Robert Payne
> > >If I can get the new device codes then >I'll update the AVR910 programmer firmware. > >Regards > >John Samperi > That would be great, I have your version3 software here with the Silicon Chip programmer and it works fine. Thanks for the effort you have put into this. BTW Stud
2005-01-15 by John Samperi
At 01:49 AM 16/01/2005, you wrote: >On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:08:34 -0000 you wrote: > >It seems to have problems with WinXP SP 2 Works OK here with win XP pro and SP2. Regards John Samperi ****************************************************** Ampertronics Pty. Ltd. 11 Brokenwood P
2005-01-15 by John Samperi
At 10:27 PM 15/01/2005, you wrote: >On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:20:03 -0000 you wrote: > >Does it do anything useful that 4.10 doesn't? i.e. is it worth upgrading? If you use the ICE200 (I do) then there are a couple of bug fixes. 41 MB it's a big download!! Also there is a new versio
2005-01-15 by Ralph Hilton
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:01:02 +0200 you wrote: > >Hi to all. >I have such question: "Which compiler to use". >There are a lot of compilers IAR EWAVR, CodeVision, ICCAVR, CrossWorks >for AVR and so on. What is your advice? Or may be shell I using an AVR >Studio? You could have a lo
2005-01-15 by dv7839
Oh boy ... I feel dumb :( I've spent hours on this, and as it turns out, I was writing the wrong program to the chip. Well, I'm a little bummed about the time I wasted, but then again at least the chip is ok. thanks dan --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Lasse Madsen" wrote: > Sou
2005-01-15 by Lasse Madsen
Sounds as if you have wrecked the port.. Or . Have you connected the AVCC pin to the SAME voltage net as VCC ? Regards Lasse Madsen _____ From: dv7839 [mailto:danvernon@earthlink.net] Sent: 15. januar 2005 18:43 To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] Question about PORT
2005-01-15 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Valerij Avrealij To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 5:01 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] Which compiler to use? Rhetorical question Hi to all. I have such question: "Which compiler to use". There are a lot of compilers IAR EWAV
2005-01-15 by Ralph Hilton
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:04:08 -0300 (ART) you wrote: >i'm tired of use it to repair pcb's, all in smd, i >have a friend who use it and i dont know how he does, >but can desolder and solder a Sony CCD ic controler, >this device have 9x9 mm and and 20 legs for each >side!!! That's a
2005-01-15 by Valerij Avrealij
Hi to all. I have such question: "Which compiler to use". There are a lot of compilers IAR EWAVR, CodeVision, ICCAVR, CrossWorks for AVR and so on. What is your advice? Or may be shell I using an AVR Studio? -- Valerij Avrealij
2005-01-15 by dv7839
I'm very new to this, so I may not have things setup right but ... I have a STK500 with a AT90S8515. I would like to use PORTA for digital I/O. I setup DDRA to 0xff (all output) and wrote 0xf0 to PORTA. I got out my logic probe, and expected for half of the pins to be high, and t
2005-01-15 by Franco
Realy i don't know what temp my solder go, but i used it a lot of years to solder and repair a los of SMD PCB, i used it to solder McU and a lot of SMD shift registers memories and others. I'm using a Good TQ-77, this solder is about 20Watts and have a pushbutton to get more than
2005-01-15 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Ralph Hilton To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR Studio update On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:08:34 -0000 you wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ralph Hilton >To: AVR-Chat@yahoog
2005-01-15 by Ralph Hilton
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 13:08:34 -0000 you wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ralph Hilton >To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:27 AM >Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR Studio update > > >On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:20:03 -0000 you wrote: > >> >> >>The
2005-01-15 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Ralph Hilton To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] AVR Studio update On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:20:03 -0000 you wrote: > > >There is an update to AVR Studio (4.11) on the Atmel web site. It >s
2005-01-15 by Ralph Hilton
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:20:03 -0000 you wrote: > > >There is an update to AVR Studio (4.11) on the Atmel web site. It >says it's a beta release, but it isn't according to the version info >when it is run. Does it do anything useful that 4.10 doesn't? i.e. is it worth upgrading? --
2005-01-15 by leon_heller
There is an update to AVR Studio (4.11) on the Atmel web site. It says it's a beta release, but it isn't according to the version info when it is run. Leon
2005-01-14 by George Smith
On 14 Jan 2005, at 17:12, Mike Harrison wrote: > WARNING!!! > Does your product use the internal eeprom ? Thanks for that Mike - since your post(s) I have been able to examine the source for both pieces of equipment. The one with the current failure uses the EEPROM only in an und
2005-01-14 by Mike Harrison
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:02:56 -0000, you wrote: > >OK I bought a couple of ATMEG8515 and programmed them with the hex file (and after >setting the fuses correctly) it seems to work properly. So many thanks for the >suggestion - I was really expecting a lot more problems... WARNING
2005-01-14 by George Smith
OK I bought a couple of ATMEG8515 and programmed them with the hex file (and after setting the fuses correctly) it seems to work properly. So many thanks for the suggestion - I was really expecting a lot more problems... regards George Smith
2005-01-14 by Lasse Madsen
Hi Fuentes. >I tried to improve the accuracy by lowering the adc > clock: > ADCSRA = 0xE0 | 0x07 ;/ /set last 3 bits > that was to set bits ADPS2, ADPS1, ADPS0. Doing that > the prescaler is set to use a division factor of 128. > But it doesn't make the ADC more stable. Actually,
2005-01-14 by Jose Fuentes
I solved some hardware problems and now the ADC is more stable. This is the source code: void init_adc(void) { ADMUX |= (0x01 escribió: > > > > > >I get a rock steady ADC reading using AVR chips > with 2 resistors on the input. > >That is without sleep mode or an LC filter. That
2005-01-14 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Jose Fuentes To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] ADC ACCURACY AND NOISE I solved some hardware problems and now the ADC is more stable. This is the source code: void init_adc(void) { ADMUX
2005-01-14 by David Kelly
On Jan 13, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Jim Wagner wrote: > You will need some sort of "driver" between the micro and > the valve. What that driver is depends on how the valve is > "actuated". It might be AC or DC - it will depend on the > valve and you have to know that, first. Don't forge
2005-01-13 by Jim Wagner
You will need some sort of "driver" between the micro and the valve. What that driver is depends on how the valve is "actuated". It might be AC or DC - it will depend on the valve and you have to know that, first. Jim --------------------------------------------------------------
2005-01-13 by MuRaT KaRaDeNiZ
Hello Randy & Zonya, Here is quadrature encoder decoding code in assembly. I use one external interrupt for a encoder and handle both the rising and falling edges of one encoder signal ( one of A or B ). This translates to 2x resolution. If you have a single motor and the other e
2005-01-13 by Shibu Krishnan
can anybody tell me hoe avr can b used to control some valves. in my specific problem, i m hving 4 test beds,in which some chemical reactions r happening. depends on the temperature,we can calculte how much % of product formed, if temp range is reached i hv to close the valve to
2005-01-13 by Dave VanHorn
> >I get a rock steady ADC reading using AVR chips with 2 resistors on the input. >That is without sleep mode or an LC filter. That is using a 115.2KHz ADC >clock. >Anything lower than 200KHz should be fine. Indeed. There are constraints to be observed, like when you change chann
2005-01-13 by Ralph Hilton
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 11:13:34 -0300 (ART) you wrote: > >I am trying to make a ohm-meter using Atmega16. The >problem is that the ADC is reading values that change >all the time (at least the five less significant bits >change all the time). I think there are several >factors that
2005-01-13 by Mike Murphree
Ralph Hilton said: > > ARS = the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology > And I was thinking Amateur Radio Service, oh well... Mike
2005-01-13 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Jose Fuentes To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] ADC ACCURACY AND NOISE It happens when I try to read the voltage in a voltage divider (two resistors) connected between VCC and GND. Also,
2005-01-13 by Jose Fuentes
It happens when I try to read the voltage in a voltage divider (two resistors) connected between VCC and GND. Also, I have separated VCC from a AVCC by using a LC filter. What clock frequency are you using? Jose --- Leon Heller escribió: > How does it behave if you are simply rea
2005-01-13 by Jose Fuentes
I am trying to make a ohm-meter using Atmega16. The problem is that the ADC is reading values that change all the time (at least the five less significant bits change all the time). I think there are several factors that affect the precision of the ADC. Some of these factors are
2005-01-13 by Leon Heller
----- Original Message ----- From: Jose Fuentes To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 2:13 PM Subject: [AVR-Chat] ADC ACCURACY AND NOISE I am trying to make a ohm-meter using Atmega16. The problem is that the ADC is reading values that change all the time
2005-01-13 by Lauer, Thilo
> Is anyone aware of any (new) old stock lying in the UK - just want > ten or twelve to last me until I retire :-) I see that Digikey is > still listing a few 8515s but their 12GBP delivery charge is a turn-off... Here in germany, www.reichelt.de is my favourite, they sell the 90
2005-01-13 by Kathy Quinlan
Ralph Hilton wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:02:13 +0800 you wrote: > > >>Dave VanHorn wrote: >> >> >>>>>Freezoner AND AVR freak! How bizarre! >>>> >>>>Perhaps even unique:-) >>> >>> >>>No stranger to ARS here. >> >>ARS ??? >> >>Regards, >> >>Kat. > > > ARS = the newsgroup alt.re
2005-01-13 by Ralph Hilton
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:02:13 +0800 you wrote: > >Dave VanHorn wrote: > >> >>>>Freezoner AND AVR freak! How bizarre! >>> >>>Perhaps even unique:-) >> >> >> No stranger to ARS here. > >ARS ??? > >Regards, > >Kat. ARS = the newsgroup alt.religion.scientology I practice Scientology o
2005-01-13 by Kathy Quinlan
Dave VanHorn wrote: > >>>Freezoner AND AVR freak! How bizarre! >> >>Perhaps even unique:-) > > > No stranger to ARS here. ARS ??? Regards, Kat. PS sorry for the last message, lack of coffee induced premature click ;) -- ------------------------------------------------------------
2005-01-13 by Kathy Quinlan
Ralph Hilton wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:47:14 -0500 Dave VanHorn wrote: > > >>>Looks disgusting! >>> >>>I just tried setting my iron to 500F and I'm sure it woud create lots of bad >>>joints as standard solder only melts at 460F. >>> >>>I usually use around 650F for solderin
2005-01-13 by Mike Murphree
Ran into a weird problem this week while modifying the AVR Butterfly code for my own application. On the Butterfly, the pins for Port B bits 4,6, and 7, plus Port E bits 2 and 3 are used for the joystick. I am using these pins for my own application and am only using the LCD driv
2005-01-12 by Dave VanHorn
> > >Freezoner AND AVR freak! How bizarre! > >Perhaps even unique:-) No stranger to ARS here. > >Also: Don't you use 63/37 eutectic solder? I thought everyone did. > >I used to - I don't actually notice much difference. Mostly I use 0.46mm 60/40 >and it melts instantly. Soon it g
2005-01-12 by John Samperi
At 05:29 PM 12/01/2005 +1000, you wrote: > G'Day. Yes, some ppl call me Nigel :) What a nice name. Ernie would have been appropriate also :-). > Are you refering to a post here or over at AVRFreaks? AVRFreaks I think. >I'm trying to remember but I can't think of anything I >would
2005-01-12 by Ralph Hilton
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:47:14 -0500 Dave VanHorn wrote: >> >>Looks disgusting! >> >>I just tried setting my iron to 500F and I'm sure it woud create lots of bad >>joints as standard solder only melts at 460F. >> >>I usually use around 650F for soldering - it gives very fast reliab
2005-01-12 by Jeffrey Engel
I got one for Christmas, but haven't had it out of the box. . . It's powered by 4 AA cells, so I think it's going to be very 'power limited'. Jeff Engel Arlington, TX --- Eric wrote: > > Has anybody heard of these soldering irons? > Hope it not iron you throw out after 100 solder