Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Messages

Browse messages

Page 87 of 307 · 15341 messages matched

Re: [AVR-Chat] About timer

2008-03-04 by Zack Widup

I think this data is all on the Atmel website. They have a spreadsheet listing that shows how many of each feature a particular chip has. Take a look. Zack On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, eko setiawan wrote: > anyone know about Atmel which include feature 4 timer/counter. > cause i will use

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] About timer

2008-03-04 by Roy E. Burrage

The selection guide at the Atmel web site has an in-depth table with all major peripherals listed for comparison. Actually, depending on your speed of operation and number of other functions required, you could use about any of the controllers if you get your firmware right. REB

Thread view Attachments: 0

About timer

2008-03-04 by eko setiawan

anyone know about Atmel which include feature 4 timer/counter. cause i will use them for 2 counters,1 pwm,and 1 timer. thanks for your help ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yah

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] How can I ...

2008-03-03 by Zack Widup

That would be quite an adventurous project. The programmer contains a programmed 90S8535 and a programmed 90S1200, both SMD on the double-sided board of the real STK500. How are you going to program them if you don't already have a programmer? Can't you buy one? Zack On Sun, 2 Ma

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] How can I ...

2008-03-03 by Klaus Ruebsam

Hop Hoh, > How can I make a STK500 programmer ?? Could you please be more precise on what you are actually asking for? The Atmel STK500 is an evaluation system that includes a serial and HV-parallel programmer for AVR-devices. If you want to build your own STK500: forget it. It i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] How can I ...

2008-03-03 by John Samperi

At 06:41 AM 3/03/2008, you wrote: >How can I make a STK500 programmer ?? You log into Digikey or you local Atmel distributor, give them some money and in a few days you have made your STK500. Regards John Samperi ******************************************************** Ampertroni

Thread view Attachments: 0

How can I ...

2008-03-02 by hop_hoh

Hi How can I make a STK500 programmer ?? please help me.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-02 by bobby cossum

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bobby cossum" wrote: > > i'm trying to get a 30Hz pulse out of timer 1. i initialize it as > follows... > // > // set up timer 1, ca 30Hz, fast pwm mode 15, prescale = 64, top = > 8333, no interrupts > // > TCCR1B = 0; // stop timer 1 > TIMSK1 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-02 by bobby cossum

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Roy E. Burrage" wrote: > > Which controller are you using? > > > REB > > mega168. 16MHz oscillator.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-02 by Roy E. Burrage

Which controller are you using? REB bobby cossum wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, James Wagner wrote: > > >> Check that you are loading the dual 8-bit registers in the correct >> ORDER. There IS a required order so that an internal "temp" register >> can load both regist

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-02 by bobby cossum

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, James Wagner wrote: > Check that you are loading the dual 8-bit registers in the correct > ORDER. There IS a required order so that an internal "temp" register > can load both registers in a single operation. Do a doc search for 16 > bit register

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-02 by James Wagner

On Mar 1, 2008, at 3:08 PM, bobby cossum wrote: > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, John Samperi wrote: > > > > At 03:07 PM 1/03/2008, you wrote: > > >--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bobby cossum" wrote: > > >first the backwards reset of the TOV1 flag. > > > you guys claim it ma

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-01 by bobby cossum

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, John Samperi wrote: > > At 03:07 PM 1/03/2008, you wrote: > >--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bobby cossum" wrote: > >first the backwards reset of the TOV1 flag. > > you guys claim it makes sense, > > Don't know whether it makes sense or not, thi

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-01 by John Samperi

At 03:07 PM 1/03/2008, you wrote: >--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bobby cossum" wrote: >first the backwards reset of the TOV1 flag. > you guys claim it makes sense, Don't know whether it makes sense or not, this is just the way that avr and other companies like Motorola (Frees

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: timer 1 question

2008-03-01 by bobby cossum

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "bobby cossum" wrote: > > i'm trying to get a 30Hz pulse out of timer 1. i initialize it as > follows... > // > // set up timer 1, ca 30Hz, fast pwm mode 15, prescale = 64, top = > 8333, no interrupts > // > TCCR1B = 0; // stop timer 1 > TIMSK1 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

*ARGH*

2008-02-29 by Tom

OK, gcc 4.3.1, AVRStudio 4,3 Service Pack 1: int main (){ uint8_t var1, var2, var3, var4; // declare 8 bit unsigned variables // for compatiblity with 8 bit // registers in the AVR register // file /* * set the bit patterns for the copy operation */ var1 = 0; // all zeros var2 =

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C useless error messages

2008-02-29 by Russell Shaw

np np wrote: > This is due to the way C is parsed by the compiler. > > The compiler throws a wobbly even in Visual C if the braces are unequal. > > It goes to the end of the file if there is one missing. Software is not clairvoyant, and the brackets are required for the parser to

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem

2008-02-29 by Russell Shaw

np np wrote: > One huge huge hole with C in some microcontrollers is the loss of the status bits after a calculation. C was designed for portability. There is no standard for how to implement hardware status, so that is non-portable and too variable to implement in C, especially

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] **YIKES**

2008-02-29 by Russell Shaw

Tom wrote: > Again: avrgcc 4.3, AVRStudio 4.31 Service Pack 1. > > Following code: > > asm volatile ( > > " ldi R16, %0 \n" > " ldi R17, %1 \n" > " ldi R18, %2 \n" > " ldi R19, %3 \n" > > " mov %3, R19 \n" > " mov %2, R18 \n" > " mov %1, R17 \n" > " mov %0, R16 \n" > > : "=r" (va

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C useless error messages

2008-02-28 by np np

This is due to the way C is parsed by the compiler. The compiler throws a wobbly even in Visual C if the braces are unequal. It goes to the end of the file if there is one missing. ----- Original Message ---- From: avrx123456789 To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, 28 Feb

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem

2008-02-28 by np np

One huge huge hole with C in some microcontrollers is the loss of the status bits after a calculation. ----- Original Message ---- From: David Kelly To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, 28 February, 2008 3:42:06 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at

Thread view Attachments: 0

**YIKES**

2008-02-28 by Tom

Again: avrgcc 4.3, AVRStudio 4.31 Service Pack 1. Following code: asm volatile ( " ldi R16, %0 \n" " ldi R17, %1 \n" " ldi R18, %2 \n" " ldi R19, %3 \n" " mov %3, R19 \n" " mov %2, R18 \n" " mov %1, R17 \n" " mov %0, R16 \n" : "=r" (var1) , "=r" (var2) , "=r" (var3) , "=r" (var4)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: **YIKES**

2008-02-28 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Tom wrote: > undefined reference to `r22' > None of R22, R23, R30 or R31 are referenced explicitly > ANYWHERE in this code That's true, but the compiler assigns locally defined variables like 'var1', etc. to registers as it pleases. The problem is

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: *** H E L P ***n (again)

2008-02-28 by Tom

Don Kinzer wrote: > > > Perhaps this is simply an exercise but the code does nothing other > than use CPU cycles. > > Don Kinzer > Yes, it is precisely an exercise, will never run in silicon. Now I am getting the following: asm volatile ( " ldi R16, (%0) \n" " ldi R17, (%1) \n" "

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem

2008-02-28 by David Kelly

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:13:49AM -0000, bhadson2001 wrote: > > unsigned char a; > a=255*20/10; > > it gives output 254 > > for > a=255*200/100; > > it gives output 111 > > why it gives different results. > > it there any logical relationship. The intermediate math is signed 16

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: *** H E L P ***

2008-02-28 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Tom wrote: >I am getting: > ../embedded_asm.c:63: error: expected ')' before '(' token You do have to follow the recipe. asm volatile ( "mov r16, %0" "\n\t" "mov r17, %1" "\n\t" "mov r18, %2" "\n\t" "mov r19, %3" "\n\t" "mov %3, r19" "\n\t" "mov %

Thread view Attachments: 0

*** H E L P ***

2008-02-28 by Tom

OK. avrgcc 4.3, AVRStudio 4,13 Service Pack 1, mixed C and assembly. I have: int main (){ uint8_t var1, var2, var3, var4; var1 = 0; // all zeros var2 = 255; // all ones var3 = 170; // alternating ones and zeros var4 = 55; // alternating zeros and ones /* * copy register to backup

Thread view Attachments: 0

C useless error messages

2008-02-28 by avrx123456789

The problem of C's error messages being useless has existed in all the C compilers I've ever used. That covers about a dozen compilers from AVR's use of gcc to somewhat larger machines that process millions of business transactions per day. I have found that using a "lint" progra

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem

2008-02-28 by Russell Shaw

bhadson2001 wrote: > unsigned char a; > a=255*20/10; > > it gives output 254 > > for > a=255*200/100; > > it gives output 111 > > why it gives different results. > > it there any logical relationship. > > kindly help me to resolve the problem. > i will be grateful > thanks a lot.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] C problem

2008-02-28 by Leon

----- Original Message ----- From: "bhadson2001" To: Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:13 AM Subject: [AVR-Chat] C problem > > unsigned char a; > a=255*20/10; > > it gives output 254 > > for > a=255*200/100; > > it gives output 111 > > why it gives different results. > > it the

Thread view Attachments: 0

C problem

2008-02-28 by bhadson2001

unsigned char a; a=255*20/10; it gives output 254 for a=255*200/100; it gives output 111 why it gives different results. it there any logical relationship. kindly help me to resolve the problem. i will be grateful thanks a lot.......

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: *ARGH*

2008-02-28 by Tom

Don Kinzer wrote: > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroup s.com , > Tom wrote: > > How do I access said vars from assembly language in > > the same program image? > > If you're referring to inline assembly language, the recipe you're > seeking is in the Inline Assembler Cookbook: > http:/

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Mega16 PWM

2008-02-28 by J C

Thanks for that idea, I did get the other code running but the clock wasn't set right so I wasn't seeing any pulses. I might try that idea in the future. David VanHorn wrote: On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:52 PM, J C wrote: > I am trying to control 2 servos with an ATMEGA16 running of

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Tom

Philippe Habib wrote: > > That's what I don't like about gcc. I don't find the errors to be that > helpful and often the error is unrelated to the problem and a hundred > lines > away. > Phillipe: to be fair, I have found that to be true with every C compiler, indeed, with every

Thread view Attachments: 0

*ARGH*

2008-02-28 by Tom

OK. Again, I am using avrgcc. I place some values in some vars declared as unit8_t. How do I access said vars from assembly language in the same program image? avrFreak

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Philippe Habib

That's what I don't like about gcc. I don't find the errors to be that helpful and often the error is unrelated to the problem and a hundred lines away. -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Wednesday, F

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: *ARGH*

2008-02-28 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Tom wrote: > How do I access said vars from assembly language in > the same program image? If you're referring to inline assembly language, the recipe you're seeking is in the Inline Assembler Cookbook: http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/i

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Tom

Tom wrote: > > I am using avrgcc 4.2.1 through AVRStudio 4.13 Service Pack 1. > > I am getting a frustrating compiler error: > > Found it! It's been 7 years since I coded any C. I had "main {" not "main () {" *sheesh* the error the compiler was tossinfg didn't help at ALL., avrFr

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: newbie looking for advice

2008-02-28 by Roy E. Burrage

A sadist is a person who's nice to masochists. From time to time it does fit here...for those of us who insist upon enduring the pain caused by a failed attempt to save 25 or 30 bucks. Figured you might appreciate, though, since you're experiencing the pain in another sort of way

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Michael Magin

I assume you're trying to define the main function... If you replace that line with (a standard-compliant main definition): int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { does the problem go away? Mike > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Tom wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tom wrote: > >

Thread view Attachments: 0

RE: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Philippe Habib

Is it because you've got a paren instead of a curly brace after main? -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 7:12 PM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] gcc probl

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Tom

Tom wrote: > > I am using avrgcc 4.2.1 through AVRStudio 4.13 Service Pack 1. > > I am getting a frustrating compiler error: > > in line 38: > > main ( > Err, typo: main { avrfreak

Thread view Attachments: 0

gcc problem

2008-02-28 by Tom

I am using avrgcc 4.2.1 through AVRStudio 4.13 Service Pack 1. I am getting a frustrating compiler error: in line 38: main ( I am getting: error: unexpected '=', ' ,' , ', ' , ';', 'asm' or '_attribute_" before '{' token Problem is the only lines prior to this line in the code ar

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: newbie looking for advice

2008-02-28 by David VanHorn

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Roy E. Burrage wrote: > Going back to what John stated earlier, Dave, do you know what a sadist is? Yes, but I'm not sure how it applies here.

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: newbie looking for advice

2008-02-28 by Roy E. Burrage

Going back to what John stated earlier, Dave, do you know what a sadist is? REB David VanHorn wrote: >> Yes but that's your fault for keep on running over black cats, >> breaking mirrors, walking under ladders etc. LOL >> > > I thought it cancelled out.. I must be off by one. :)

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: newbie looking for advice

2008-02-27 by John Samperi

At 08:50 AM 28/02/2008, you wrote: >Their latest reply says that they can't find anyone else having >problems like this, Had the same run around with the ICE200 :-( I even showed the guy that came from Norway for a seminar. The problem never got fixed and it is still there with n

Thread view Attachments: 0

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: newbie looking for advice

2008-02-27 by David VanHorn

> Yes but that's your fault for keep on running over black cats, > breaking mirrors, walking under ladders etc. LOL I thought it cancelled out.. I must be off by one. :) Their latest reply says that they can't find anyone else having problems like this, and they want me to provid

Thread view Attachments: 0

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.