I don't see a problem to tamper/pondering with and your arguments seemd pretty constructed to me, never occured to me in reality... I just think that some ppl. are so fixed in one solution that they don't want alternatives... On 4 Oct 2008 at 22:45, zoinky420 wrote: > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Summa" <flotorian@...> wrote: > > > > Well, you might haven't recognised, but this was an rhetorical and > no > > general question... ;) > > > > Actually it was neither rhetorical nor general. You specifically said > that you didn't understand why MIDI transposition would be necessary > to a device (in this case, the MC-505) that allows for transposition > of its internal sound generator, and I explained why it would be > necessary in a particular circumstance. Though why we are discussing > MC-505 features here is a question worth pondering. > > > > > > On 4 Oct 2008 at 5:26, zoinky420 wrote: > > > > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Summa" <flotorian@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 Oct 2008 at 10:27, jdcx64 wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "Summa" <flotorian@> wrote: > > > > > > But most synths are able to transpose their > soundgeneration, I > > > know > > > > > > for sure that MC-505 (I own a D2) and MS2000 (having a > > > microKorg) > > > > > > can do that... > > > > > > > > > > I don't mean afterwords note transposing, I mean real-time > octave > > > > > shift of the MIDI input. I don't think the MC-505 can do it, I > > > > > couldn't find a way to do it and this is a response from > another > > > guy > > > > > on the MC-505 group: > > > > > > > > I don't understand, since result wise this doesn't make a > > > difference > > > > to shift the internal soundgeneration instead. It should be the > > > part > > > > settings/coarse tune parameter for the MC505... > > > > > > > > > > Of course it makes a difference, if you are transposing the MIDI > > > rather than the receiving device, then you can jack that MIDI to > any > > > receiving device with the correct transposition, otherwise you > would > > > have to transpose each receiving device seperately (and if the > > > receiving device has no transpose function, you're out of luck). > > > > -- > > > > CZ/VZ mailing list : > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth > > FMHeaven mailing list : > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fmheaven/ > > FS1R mailing list : > http://www.ampfea.org/mailman/listinfo/fss-list > > Vokator mailing list : > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vokator > > FM-Synthesis mailing list : > > http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/fm-synthesis/ > > > > http://www.summasounds.de/ > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > -- CZ/VZ mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CZsynth FMHeaven mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fmheaven/ FS1R mailing list : http://www.ampfea.org/mailman/listinfo/fss-list Vokator mailing list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vokator FM-Synthesis mailing list : http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/fm-synthesis/ http://www.summasounds.de/
Message
Re: [CZsynth] Re: MIDI output problem
2008-10-04 by Summa
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.