Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

if you like the external control
you should see what those sound modules are capabile of
if  the jup and cz has you gushing
try a roland d-110 or roland jv880
control by prophet2000

filter resonance all nprm and data control , plus live sys ex record/pg-10
while play for manipulation

i don't have full comperhension yet cause you said cz1 and i have only cz101
,, its easy to assume we have differences allready


total control!!!
only one trouble ,, i only have ten fingers and about
100 tracks of data to control

like simplistic music too ,
variation is good

charles




----- Original Message -----
From: "zubibaja" <zubibaja@...>
To: <CZsynth@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 9:14 AM
Subject: [CZsynth] Re: Who Still Uses A CZ?


>I settled for a very cheap CZ5000 and am now just getting to grips with
its
>built in sequencer. It adds a nice touch to the otherwise CZ3000 spec
and
>I'm not really missing the CZ1's keyboard sensitivity. Some synths just
>aren't necessarily designed to rely on that kind of feature.

The thing with the CZ-1\ufffds velocity sensivility is not just volume
control, but pitch and especially timbre control. That makes is it, by
far, the most usefull and versatile CZ of all. Imagine having realtime
control of the pitch of one of the oscillators when using ring or noise
modulation. Or doing analogue type sequences with different DCW levels
on each note...  And volume control is useful sometimes.
My Jupiter-6 took another dimention when I installed the Europa upgrade
and was  able to control filter cutoff (or any other parameter) with
velocity...






------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links