Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

The Casio HT range are ANALOGUE, not digital! ;-) The oscillator(s) is/ are
digitally controlled (for stable tuning), the sound generation is pure
analogue as are the filters!

Like you, I found my HT 700 to be sort of more characterful than my HT
6000. I think the presets on the HT 6000 make it sound more like FM
synthesis, too clean sounding, rather than analogue. Weird how the CZ range
is supposed to have ripped of Yamaha's FM, yet the CZ's can sound WAY more
like analogue, and the structure of building the CZ waveforms is based on
subtractive analogue style synthesis. Maybe having individual filters per
note played somehow detracts from the analogue feel on the HT 6000?I can't
remember if my Roland JX3P does the same or not with its filter.

I also like the HT 700 because it's nice and compact, is always there and
easy to access and sounds sweet. Like my big CZ-1, my HT 6000 is stored
away in another room because of its size. My HT 700 and CZ 101 sit side by
side next to my computer! The HT 700/ 3000 are no MiniMoog/ ARP Odyssey,
nor as lush as something like a Juno 60, but they do have a character of
their own. I am very tempted to modify mine as per the videos in my other
post to get the resonance really going for it and sending the filter into
self oscillation!


Chas

On 24 March 2012 18:43, Kenneth Abildgaard <kenneth@oiio.dk> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Well. It's hard to say but the HT3000 is a true gem if you like sizzly
> digital synths. I like mine so much I also purchased a HT6000, but the
> HT3000 is - for some reason - my favorite of the two.
>
> Kenneth
> 12bit.com
>
> Den 24/03/2012 kl. 19.37 skrev Jason Adkins <jason_ralf808@...>:
>
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Is a HT3000 worth buying off UK ebay for �60?
> >
> > J
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]