Yahoo Groups archive

Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:42 UTC

Message

Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

2012-10-22 by jammie

yes the mono tribe is pure analog electronics

but descrete analog electronics is the way to go and easy to repair and get parts for but the use 4-5 times the amount of components but they are matches better

and provide superior sound
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jason Adkins 
  To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:47 PM
  Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m


    
  Wow Jammie,that was a thorough reply I'm not even going to try and 
  reply or argue with that.
  My favourite synth at the moment is a Korg Monotribe which I believe 
  is a real analogue monosynth according to the manual it certainly 
  sounds like one in fact I love the thing and only cost me £139 new I 
  have owned Pro-1's sh101/mc202 transendent 2000 tb303 and moog's + 
  others and this is equally nice.

  J

  On 21 Oct 2012, at 16:09, jammie wrote:

  > it was becuase every thing went digital
  >
  > the dsm1 was used for the pcm content for the m1 and t series and 01w
  >
  > they were pure digital machines with no res filter
  >
  > the dz7 was to blame for most synths discarding analog filters
  >
  > ensoniq was another company they were all analog hybrid filters with 
  > digital osc
  >
  > but when cem started to stop manufacture due to the digital synths 
  > and updated poly by digital means to have a 24 32 64 voice poly 
  > synth with analog filters would mean 64 analog filters 64 analog vca
  >
  > this would have made the synths to big and the cost was to great
  >
  > so all manufacturers made asic chips that could simulate filters
  >
  > doing negative feed back in digital properly is very hard for one 
  > thing you need lots of processor power they just never had thing 
  > fast enough
  >
  > and you get samples in time delay for feed back
  >
  > unlike analog which is zero time as its fed straight to the input
  >
  > with digital it all has to be computed the fed back to the begining 
  > which adds latency
  >
  > roland did it but it was good but analog it was not
  >
  > casio created the first and only hybrid filter being digital control 
  > by cpu and analog audio path
  >
  > all other systems they had to use dacs for the cv under cpu control 
  > the sample and hold multiplexers which were digitally controlled and 
  > they would sample the cv volTAGE AT ITS IMPUT OF 5V AND THEN
  >
  > the sample and hold would sample the voltage given by the cpu and 
  > hold it in the output this would be sent tothe filters
  >
  > this was first done on an 8bit system
  >
  > thats why some analog synths that are cpu controlled were a little 
  > steppy
  >
  > the later synths like the jx3p and 8p and the matrix12 used 12bit 
  > dacs for the cv control giving better rate but on the matrix 1000 it 
  > was left as 8bits and is very steppy
  >
  > for those type of sounds today i use the shruthi which is digital 
  > and a new analog filter
  >
  > out of all digital res filters i have used the roland s series 
  > samplers and the kurzweil vast dsp system are the best
  >
  > yamaha are not that bad sy99sy77 and the va and later synths
  >
  > as for wavetable synthesis using your own wavetables the eps16+/ 
  > asr10 ts10/12 are the best and can do way more than the waldorfs can 
  > do
  >
  > i own a waldorf wave and a uwave 1
  >
  > i have owned a blofeld and a q but i got rid of those as i could do 
  > the sounds on the ensoniqs but bigger more massive sounding
  >
  > and with wavetables res filters are no good as you lose the fealing 
  > of the wavetable at high res settings they just become sin waves 
  > losing all the detail of the wavetable
  >
  > even on the ppg the patches that used the scanning capability did 
  > not use res
  >
  > the res usually was used when just using a single cycle of the table 
  > with no wavetable morph to simulate analog synths that only used sin/ 
  > tri/square/saw noise waves
  >
  > i like the filters on the s3200 with its extra filter board you can 
  > do some neat filter tricks
  >
  > i liked this sampler so much i still own 5 of them with 3 having the 
  > 135mb optical drives
  >
  > i have 5 asr10 3 keyboards 2 racks
  >
  > and 3 s760 samplers and 1 s770 nice dacs on that
  >
  > i like the s950 and i have a mpc60 which i use for hardware sequencer
  >
  > kurzweil k2000sp and k2500 rack
  >
  > tx16w
  >
  > the 2 dsm1 used mainly for support of the t1 and t3ex
  >
  > the dss1x with the usb and the 16mb upgrade with wave file support
  >
  > EII/EIII/e6400ultra/emulatorx2
  >
  > i have owned a synclavier and a fairlight cmxIII
  >
  > but sold both of them ages ago when they were fetching big second 
  > hand mula
  >
  > i own a gem s2turbo which is also a good wavetable synthand can add 
  > your own
  >
  > being a synth tech i get my hands on so many synths and samplers and 
  > get given stuff that people no longer want as part payments
  >
  > the fz1 still has at to play in songs as its gritty and can do very 
  > good synth type sounds
  >
  > the alphajuno1/2 the hoover sound was sampled a lot as the filter 
  > and pitch modulation for hoover type sounds was great on the fz1 and 
  > was used by many freinds in the early 80,s for this
  >
  > yes the alphajuno could do it but in unison mode you only get 1 key 
  > sampling the unison mode and then putting it through thr fz1 filter 
  > with the pitch and the filter cuttoff modulated with the mod wheel 
  > made it so much fatter with doing chords
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: Jason Adkins
  > To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:22 PM
  > Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >
  >
  >
  > Hiya,
  >
  > I know what you mean,but the filters on my S5000 are not too bad.
  > I'm sure we have probably had this conversation before but if the
  > DSM-1 had those facilities basically in the first place why did they
  > release it as it was? It just doesn't make sense unless they didn't
  > want to take sales away from the DSS-1?
  >
  > J
  >
  > On 21 Oct 2012, at 10:34, jammie wrote:
  >
  >> yes but the akai are so clinical digital
  >>
  >> even though the dsm1 never had res it did still have analog filters
  >> and they are warm
  >>
  >> i use the dsm1 mainly for pcm creation of samples for the t1 and
  >> t3ex that i have i have 2 dsm1 1 which i have done the res
  >> conversion and the external inputs so i can run my digital synths
  >> through it
  >>
  >> AND ONE TOTALLY UNTOUCHED VERSION
  >>
  >> we are working on a usb and 16mb upgrade for it with a filter
  >> upgrade board that will fit in the original pads in sockets this
  >> will give us res but also we are doing the pole mixing like the
  >> matrix12
  >>
  >> my spectral sound sets can be used on the fz1 ill do a bunch in fzf
  >> format which you can dump to the synth via midi let me know what
  >> waveshapes you want
  >>
  >> i have the full single cycle waves of each wavetable of the ppg 
  >> series
  >>
  >> same for the uwave and the uwavext
  >>
  >> i have the 128 wavetable 1/2 of the waldorfq
  >>
  >> the waves tables of the esq1 and the vfx range
  >>
  >> the prophet vs including my user waves
  >>
  >> the kawai k3 k1/k4/
  >>
  >> and lots of analog waves sampled from analog synths
  >>
  >> by layering them in the fz1 range you can get 4 samples layered with
  >> 2 note poly to do d50 or prophet vs type patches
  >>
  >> and you can do 8 layer unison detuned type sounds using 8 layers by
  >> layering them and detuning them with a sub osc being 2 octaves lower
  >> you can get very fat sounds
  >>
  >> and i like the analog filter on the fz1 its digitally controlled but
  >> the audio is pure analog same way the osc are controlled on the dco
  >> of the roland series
  >>
  >> which are pure analog patch with digital clock stable tune control
  >> ----- Original Message -----
  >> From: Jason Adkins
  >> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  >> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:50 AM
  >> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> You certainly seem to be doing some interesting stuff Jammie.
  >> I used to have briefly a DSM1,sorry I hated it nowhere near as good
  >> as
  >> the DSS-1 no delay's and no analogue filters as standard without
  >> f**king about with it (I''m no circuit bender sadly) sorry I love the
  >> digital wave stuff but I'm still a tart when it comes to analogue
  >> filters and the floppy on the DSM1 was a c**t. no wonder everybody
  >> and
  >> his wife bought an Akai.
  >>
  >> I think I may have Turbosynth.... also you can do some interesting
  >> stuff with Steinberg Avalon (Atari again).
  >>
  >> Sorry for truncated response my football team Norwich are on match of
  >> the day in a moment which I want to watch, they beat Arsenal for the
  >> first time at Carrow Road in 28 years today.
  >>
  >> J
  >>
  >> On 20 Oct 2012, at 22:38, jammie wrote:
  >>
  >>> i have loads of 8bit waves for the prophet vs
  >>>
  >>> we are working on new pcm cards for the wavestation so in the near
  >>> future it will be possible to write new pcm data to the pcm card
  >>>
  >>> plus they are going to be 2-4mb switched in 512k banks
  >>>
  >>> get a dsm1 they are great same additive engine as the dss1 and it
  >>> has 4 multitimbral so doing prophet vs sounds is easy
  >>>
  >>> but with samples so its more like a jd800/jd990 but with analog
  >>> filters
  >>>
  >>> the dsm1 has 16 of the dss1 chips res is tied to ground but easy to
  >>> cut a trace add a 100ohm resister for current limiting and adding a
  >>> pot to a 5v source this willgive good res but not self osc becuase
  >>> you need 7v for that
  >>>
  >>> i used on one of my dsm1 machines with a doepfer midi to cv
  >>> controller you get 16 midi cv outputs that can be set up to any midi
  >>> cc control they are 0-5 v cv,s
  >>>
  >>> the emax uses the same type of system but you have 32 partials but
  >>> you also get to do them on a table ppg style
  >>>
  >>> you choose various additive waveforms on this table then you set
  >>> volume envelopes for each cycle in the table and pitch envelopes and
  >>> the you interpolate from one single cycle to the other creating a
  >>> spectral variating waveform like as if you were scanning the ppg
  >>> wavetables
  >>>
  >>> the emax then creates this as a multisample and then you loop it or
  >>> what ever to get good no clicking loops of this file you need to use
  >>> the same single cycle additive waveform
  >>>
  >>> for slot one and the end slot
  >>>
  >>> the digidesign designed a software program that copied this and it
  >>> could do it on a mac screen rather than use the tiny lcd
  >>>
  >>> it was called softsynth both for mac and atari
  >>>
  >>> then they did a better version called turbo synth both mac and atari
  >>>
  >>> i used to use it on the mirage as it did great wavetables like this
  >>> and made it easy for looping
  >>>
  >>> i create transwaves the same way for ensoniqs as they can sweep them
  >>> like the ppg
  >>>
  >>> i have done all the ppg
  >>>
  >>> the uwaveand wave which has 64 of them which also include the ppg
  >>> but they sound different becuase the uwave and xt use half cycle
  >>> waves then they compute the other half as a mirror image
  >>>
  >>> which is impossible to do with additive synthesis
  >>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>> From: Jason Adkins
  >>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  >>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:56 PM
  >>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> Hi Jammie,
  >>>
  >>> I have never used an Emax I think Francis Cote who post's on here 
  >>> has
  >>> an Emax or 2 so he'd be a good guy to talk to.
  >>> I'd love a DSS1 again but I havn't got the space now sadly (I used 
  >>> to
  >>> keep all my gear around a friends house at the time) those things 
  >>> are
  >>> f**king huge.
  >>> Can you do a similar trick with a wavestation/prophet VS?
  >>>
  >>> J
  >>>
  >>> On 20 Oct 2012, at 21:33, jammie wrote:
  >>>
  >>>> and single cycle waves are the way to go with theses samplers the 
  >>>> k3
  >>>> k5 k5000 ppg dss1 and the fz1 range all have additive sin synthesis
  >>>>
  >>>> but the neat trick on both the dss1 and the fz range is that you 
  >>>> can
  >>>> link mix the additive waves to create a moving wavetable
  >>>>
  >>>> a bit like the emax spectral synth generation
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>>> From: jammie
  >>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  >>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:29 PM
  >>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> yes you can fit scsi its the card fitted to the fz20
  >>>>
  >>>> but you need a copy of the scsi floppy access software
  >>>>
  >>>> and charlie still needs to get a good working floppy drive
  >>>>
  >>>> the floppy emulator is cheaper than a replacement drive
  >>>>
  >>>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>>> From: Jason Adkins
  >>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  >>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:19 PM
  >>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>>>
  >>>> I think the FZ1/10m/20m is worth the effort the synth section 
  >>>> sounds
  >>>> superb,my friend used to use that all the time,the only other 
  >>>> synth/
  >>>> sampler I have used which had the a similar function was the Korg
  >>>> DSS-1 (just usiing a slider) although there are a few programs for
  >>>> the
  >>>> Atari which allow you to draw a waveform as does the Roland 
  >>>> samplers
  >>>> and the Fairlight of course.
  >>>> I think a PPG and possibly the Kawai K5 could do additive drawing
  >>>> using a slider too.
  >>>> I know the FZ10m could be fitted with scsi because I saw one in a
  >>>> studio in Islington London and I asked the engineer if I could
  >>>> have a
  >>>> look around the back because he was loading sounds to it from a Jaz
  >>>> drive.
  >>>>
  >>>> J
  >>>>
  >>>> On 19 Oct 2012, at 00:18, charlie midi gfa wrote:
  >>>>
  >>>>> im sure the technicians will love me $$$ ,
  >>>>> and by now the prices of a
  >>>>> shugart to scsi adaptor has sky rocketed.....
  >>>>> so the raw image is it 1.68 Mb?
  >>>>> please go on jammie , do you use some of this technology
  >>>>> personally?
  >>>>> i am interested adapting
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> charles
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>>>> From: "Jason Adkins" <jason_ralf808@...>
  >>>>> To: <CZsynth@yahoogroups.com>
  >>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:23 PM
  >>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>> I don't agree,I think the FZ10m had a scsi option too.
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> On 18 Oct 2012, at 19:43, jammie wrote:
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>> its the floppy emulator image software that does a raw image it
  >>>>>>> cant
  >>>>>>> be read by anything except the fz1/fz10/fz20
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> there is no other programs that can write the floppy image back
  >>>>>>> to
  >>>>>>> the floppy becuase its a different speed
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> only the fz20 had scsi and its useless with out the floppy as
  >>>>>>> its a
  >>>>>>> floppy disk access program has to be loaded sop that the fz20 
  >>>>>>> can
  >>>>>>> use the scsi
  >>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
  >>>>>>> From: Jason Adkins
  >>>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
  >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:35 PM
  >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Isn't there a PC program that will image FZ1/10m/20m floppies?
  >>>>>>> Is your FZ10m fitted with SCSI?
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> J
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2012, at 00:11, charlie midi gfa wrote:
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> so a little o.t.
  >>>>>>>> but
  >>>>>>>> anybody tell me what drive will work in a fz10m ,
  >>>>>>>> (cross reference the matsushita ju-255 )
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> i can't find suitable drive or a indentical one to repair the
  >>>>>>>> fz10m
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> charles
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> ------------------------------------
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> ------------------------------------
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>> ------------------------------------
  >>>>>
  >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>> ------------------------------------
  >>>>
  >>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> ------------------------------------
  >>>
  >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >> ------------------------------------
  >>
  >> Yahoo! Groups Links
  >>
  >>
  >>
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >
  >
  >
  > ------------------------------------
  >
  > Yahoo! Groups Links
  >
  >
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.