Yahoo Groups archive

Casio CZ/ VZ/ FZ - Pro Series

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:42 UTC

Message

Re: [CZsynth] Re: casio fz10m

2012-10-24 by K Davis

Frankly, while Charles may have a point about it being good form to start a new thread for tangential musings, I'd be very unhappy about discouraging such great sources of information as jammie.  I'll read through a LOT of slightly disorganized information rather than forego it altogether. 

So please, take it easy on people who are actually contributing and trying to help.  I think you'll be MORE likely to get your initial question addressed thoroughly if you lighten up a little.

Besides, it's not like the Casio group is overflowing with activity most days.  I think the gentleman who commented about top-posting has a far more substantive point.

Thanks for all the great discussion and information, everyone.  :)



--- On Tue, 10/23/12, Jason Adkins <jason_ralf808@...> wrote:

From: Jason Adkins <jason_ralf808@...>
Subject: Re: [CZsynth] Re: casio fz10m
To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2012, 7:28 PM
















 



  


    
      
      
      Hey glad to hear it Charles did you take your false teeth out of the  

disk drive?



J



On 24 Oct 2012, at 02:34, charlie midi gfa wrote:



> im bad for this too , but lets remmeber  to address the originator  

> of the

> thread and not the followers,,any side longed comments or items  

> should have

> their own thread , else the group will look like crap...

>

> i did however manage to fix repair and re-install the original drive  

> for the

> fz10m..so now i want to do disk trades..new thread!

>

> charles

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From: "Jason Adkins" <jason_ralf808@...>

> To: <CZsynth@yahoogroups.com>

> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 9:59 AM

> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] Re: casio fz10m

>

>

> I think we are both in trouble I'm going to sit in the naughty corner.

>

> J

>

> On 23 Oct 2012, at 14:31, jammie wrote:

>

>> i was asked a question by a member even if its of topic i answered it

>> ----- Original Message -----

>> From: charles c

>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 10:58 PM

>> Subject: [CZsynth] Re: casio fz10m

>>

>>

>>

>> you guys are off topic and what does this have to do with the

>> original thread?

>> charles]

>>

>> --- In CZsynth@yahoogroups.com, "jammie" <jammie.emma@...> wrote:

>>>

>>> yes the mono tribe is pure analog electronics

>>>

>>> but descrete analog electronics is the way to go and easy to repair

>>> and get parts for but the use 4-5 times the amount of components

>>> but they are matches better

>>>

>>> and provide superior sound

>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:47 PM

>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Wow Jammie,that was a thorough reply I'm not even going to try and

>>> reply or argue with that.

>>> My favourite synth at the moment is a Korg Monotribe which I believe

>>> is a real analogue monosynth according to the manual it certainly

>>> sounds like one in fact I love the thing and only cost me £139 new I

>>> have owned Pro-1's sh101/mc202 transendent 2000 tb303 and moog's +

>>> others and this is equally nice.

>>>

>>> J

>>>

>>> On 21 Oct 2012, at 16:09, jammie wrote:

>>>

>>>> it was becuase every thing went digital

>>>>

>>>> the dsm1 was used for the pcm content for the m1 and t series and

>>>> 01w

>>>>

>>>> they were pure digital machines with no res filter

>>>>

>>>> the dz7 was to blame for most synths discarding analog filters

>>>>

>>>> ensoniq was another company they were all analog hybrid filters  

>>>> with

>>>> digital osc

>>>>

>>>> but when cem started to stop manufacture due to the digital synths

>>>> and updated poly by digital means to have a 24 32 64 voice poly

>>>> synth with analog filters would mean 64 analog filters 64 analog  

>>>> vca

>>>>

>>>> this would have made the synths to big and the cost was to great

>>>>

>>>> so all manufacturers made asic chips that could simulate filters

>>>>

>>>> doing negative feed back in digital properly is very hard for one

>>>> thing you need lots of processor power they just never had thing

>>>> fast enough

>>>>

>>>> and you get samples in time delay for feed back

>>>>

>>>> unlike analog which is zero time as its fed straight to the input

>>>>

>>>> with digital it all has to be computed the fed back to the begining

>>>> which adds latency

>>>>

>>>> roland did it but it was good but analog it was not

>>>>

>>>> casio created the first and only hybrid filter being digital  

>>>> control

>>>> by cpu and analog audio path

>>>>

>>>> all other systems they had to use dacs for the cv under cpu control

>>>> the sample and hold multiplexers which were digitally controlled  

>>>> and

>>>> they would sample the cv volTAGE AT ITS IMPUT OF 5V AND THEN

>>>>

>>>> the sample and hold would sample the voltage given by the cpu and

>>>> hold it in the output this would be sent tothe filters

>>>>

>>>> this was first done on an 8bit system

>>>>

>>>> thats why some analog synths that are cpu controlled were a little

>>>> steppy

>>>>

>>>> the later synths like the jx3p and 8p and the matrix12 used 12bit

>>>> dacs for the cv control giving better rate but on the matrix 1000  

>>>> it

>>>> was left as 8bits and is very steppy

>>>>

>>>> for those type of sounds today i use the shruthi which is digital

>>>> and a new analog filter

>>>>

>>>> out of all digital res filters i have used the roland s series

>>>> samplers and the kurzweil vast dsp system are the best

>>>>

>>>> yamaha are not that bad sy99sy77 and the va and later synths

>>>>

>>>> as for wavetable synthesis using your own wavetables the eps16+/

>>>> asr10 ts10/12 are the best and can do way more than the waldorfs  

>>>> can

>>>> do

>>>>

>>>> i own a waldorf wave and a uwave 1

>>>>

>>>> i have owned a blofeld and a q but i got rid of those as i could do

>>>> the sounds on the ensoniqs but bigger more massive sounding

>>>>

>>>> and with wavetables res filters are no good as you lose the fealing

>>>> of the wavetable at high res settings they just become sin waves

>>>> losing all the detail of the wavetable

>>>>

>>>> even on the ppg the patches that used the scanning capability did

>>>> not use res

>>>>

>>>> the res usually was used when just using a single cycle of the  

>>>> table

>>>> with no wavetable morph to simulate analog synths that only used

>>>> sin/

>>>> tri/square/saw noise waves

>>>>

>>>> i like the filters on the s3200 with its extra filter board you can

>>>> do some neat filter tricks

>>>>

>>>> i liked this sampler so much i still own 5 of them with 3 having  

>>>> the

>>>> 135mb optical drives

>>>>

>>>> i have 5 asr10 3 keyboards 2 racks

>>>>

>>>> and 3 s760 samplers and 1 s770 nice dacs on that

>>>>

>>>> i like the s950 and i have a mpc60 which i use for hardware

>>>> sequencer

>>>>

>>>> kurzweil k2000sp and k2500 rack

>>>>

>>>> tx16w

>>>>

>>>> the 2 dsm1 used mainly for support of the t1 and t3ex

>>>>

>>>> the dss1x with the usb and the 16mb upgrade with wave file support

>>>>

>>>> EII/EIII/e6400ultra/emulatorx2

>>>>

>>>> i have owned a synclavier and a fairlight cmxIII

>>>>

>>>> but sold both of them ages ago when they were fetching big second

>>>> hand mula

>>>>

>>>> i own a gem s2turbo which is also a good wavetable synthand can add

>>>> your own

>>>>

>>>> being a synth tech i get my hands on so many synths and samplers  

>>>> and

>>>> get given stuff that people no longer want as part payments

>>>>

>>>> the fz1 still has at to play in songs as its gritty and can do very

>>>> good synth type sounds

>>>>

>>>> the alphajuno1/2 the hoover sound was sampled a lot as the filter

>>>> and pitch modulation for hoover type sounds was great on the fz1  

>>>> and

>>>> was used by many freinds in the early 80,s for this

>>>>

>>>> yes the alphajuno could do it but in unison mode you only get 1 key

>>>> sampling the unison mode and then putting it through thr fz1 filter

>>>> with the pitch and the filter cuttoff modulated with the mod wheel

>>>> made it so much fatter with doing chords

>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:22 PM

>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Hiya,

>>>>

>>>> I know what you mean,but the filters on my S5000 are not too bad.

>>>> I'm sure we have probably had this conversation before but if the

>>>> DSM-1 had those facilities basically in the first place why did  

>>>> they

>>>> release it as it was? It just doesn't make sense unless they didn't

>>>> want to take sales away from the DSS-1?

>>>>

>>>> J

>>>>

>>>> On 21 Oct 2012, at 10:34, jammie wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> yes but the akai are so clinical digital

>>>>>

>>>>> even though the dsm1 never had res it did still have analog  

>>>>> filters

>>>>> and they are warm

>>>>>

>>>>> i use the dsm1 mainly for pcm creation of samples for the t1 and

>>>>> t3ex that i have i have 2 dsm1 1 which i have done the res

>>>>> conversion and the external inputs so i can run my digital synths

>>>>> through it

>>>>>

>>>>> AND ONE TOTALLY UNTOUCHED VERSION

>>>>>

>>>>> we are working on a usb and 16mb upgrade for it with a filter

>>>>> upgrade board that will fit in the original pads in sockets this

>>>>> will give us res but also we are doing the pole mixing like the

>>>>> matrix12

>>>>>

>>>>> my spectral sound sets can be used on the fz1 ill do a bunch in  

>>>>> fzf

>>>>> format which you can dump to the synth via midi let me know what

>>>>> waveshapes you want

>>>>>

>>>>> i have the full single cycle waves of each wavetable of the ppg

>>>>> series

>>>>>

>>>>> same for the uwave and the uwavext

>>>>>

>>>>> i have the 128 wavetable 1/2 of the waldorfq

>>>>>

>>>>> the waves tables of the esq1 and the vfx range

>>>>>

>>>>> the prophet vs including my user waves

>>>>>

>>>>> the kawai k3 k1/k4/

>>>>>

>>>>> and lots of analog waves sampled from analog synths

>>>>>

>>>>> by layering them in the fz1 range you can get 4 samples layered

>>>>> with

>>>>> 2 note poly to do d50 or prophet vs type patches

>>>>>

>>>>> and you can do 8 layer unison detuned type sounds using 8 layers  

>>>>> by

>>>>> layering them and detuning them with a sub osc being 2 octaves

>>>>> lower

>>>>> you can get very fat sounds

>>>>>

>>>>> and i like the analog filter on the fz1 its digitally controlled

>>>>> but

>>>>> the audio is pure analog same way the osc are controlled on the  

>>>>> dco

>>>>> of the roland series

>>>>>

>>>>> which are pure analog patch with digital clock stable tune control

>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>>> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:50 AM

>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> You certainly seem to be doing some interesting stuff Jammie.

>>>>> I used to have briefly a DSM1,sorry I hated it nowhere near as  

>>>>> good

>>>>> as

>>>>> the DSS-1 no delay's and no analogue filters as standard without

>>>>> f**king about with it (I''m no circuit bender sadly) sorry I love

>>>>> the

>>>>> digital wave stuff but I'm still a tart when it comes to analogue

>>>>> filters and the floppy on the DSM1 was a c**t. no wonder everybody

>>>>> and

>>>>> his wife bought an Akai.

>>>>>

>>>>> I think I may have Turbosynth.... also you can do some interesting

>>>>> stuff with Steinberg Avalon (Atari again).

>>>>>

>>>>> Sorry for truncated response my football team Norwich are on

>>>>> match of

>>>>> the day in a moment which I want to watch, they beat Arsenal for

>>>>> the

>>>>> first time at Carrow Road in 28 years today.

>>>>>

>>>>> J

>>>>>

>>>>> On 20 Oct 2012, at 22:38, jammie wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> i have loads of 8bit waves for the prophet vs

>>>>>>

>>>>>> we are working on new pcm cards for the wavestation so in the  

>>>>>> near

>>>>>> future it will be possible to write new pcm data to the pcm card

>>>>>>

>>>>>> plus they are going to be 2-4mb switched in 512k banks

>>>>>>

>>>>>> get a dsm1 they are great same additive engine as the dss1 and it

>>>>>> has 4 multitimbral so doing prophet vs sounds is easy

>>>>>>

>>>>>> but with samples so its more like a jd800/jd990 but with analog

>>>>>> filters

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the dsm1 has 16 of the dss1 chips res is tied to ground but easy

>>>>>> to

>>>>>> cut a trace add a 100ohm resister for current limiting and

>>>>>> adding a

>>>>>> pot to a 5v source this willgive good res but not self osc  

>>>>>> becuase

>>>>>> you need 7v for that

>>>>>>

>>>>>> i used on one of my dsm1 machines with a doepfer midi to cv

>>>>>> controller you get 16 midi cv outputs that can be set up to any

>>>>>> midi

>>>>>> cc control they are 0-5 v cv,s

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the emax uses the same type of system but you have 32 partials  

>>>>>> but

>>>>>> you also get to do them on a table ppg style

>>>>>>

>>>>>> you choose various additive waveforms on this table then you set

>>>>>> volume envelopes for each cycle in the table and pitch envelopes

>>>>>> and

>>>>>> the you interpolate from one single cycle to the other creating a

>>>>>> spectral variating waveform like as if you were scanning the ppg

>>>>>> wavetables

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the emax then creates this as a multisample and then you loop it

>>>>>> or

>>>>>> what ever to get good no clicking loops of this file you need to

>>>>>> use

>>>>>> the same single cycle additive waveform

>>>>>>

>>>>>> for slot one and the end slot

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the digidesign designed a software program that copied this and  

>>>>>> it

>>>>>> could do it on a mac screen rather than use the tiny lcd

>>>>>>

>>>>>> it was called softsynth both for mac and atari

>>>>>>

>>>>>> then they did a better version called turbo synth both mac and

>>>>>> atari

>>>>>>

>>>>>> i used to use it on the mirage as it did great wavetables like

>>>>>> this

>>>>>> and made it easy for looping

>>>>>>

>>>>>> i create transwaves the same way for ensoniqs as they can sweep

>>>>>> them

>>>>>> like the ppg

>>>>>>

>>>>>> i have done all the ppg

>>>>>>

>>>>>> the uwaveand wave which has 64 of them which also include the ppg

>>>>>> but they sound different becuase the uwave and xt use half cycle

>>>>>> waves then they compute the other half as a mirror image

>>>>>>

>>>>>> which is impossible to do with additive synthesis

>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:56 PM

>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Hi Jammie,

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I have never used an Emax I think Francis Cote who post's on here

>>>>>> has

>>>>>> an Emax or 2 so he'd be a good guy to talk to.

>>>>>> I'd love a DSS1 again but I havn't got the space now sadly (I  

>>>>>> used

>>>>>> to

>>>>>> keep all my gear around a friends house at the time) those things

>>>>>> are

>>>>>> f**king huge.

>>>>>> Can you do a similar trick with a wavestation/prophet VS?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> J

>>>>>>

>>>>>> On 20 Oct 2012, at 21:33, jammie wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> and single cycle waves are the way to go with theses samplers  

>>>>>>> the

>>>>>>> k3

>>>>>>> k5 k5000 ppg dss1 and the fz1 range all have additive sin

>>>>>>> synthesis

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> but the neat trick on both the dss1 and the fz range is that you

>>>>>>> can

>>>>>>> link mix the additive waves to create a moving wavetable

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> a bit like the emax spectral synth generation

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>>>> From: jammie

>>>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:29 PM

>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> yes you can fit scsi its the card fitted to the fz20

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> but you need a copy of the scsi floppy access software

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> and charlie still needs to get a good working floppy drive

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> the floppy emulator is cheaper than a replacement drive

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 9:19 PM

>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I think the FZ1/10m/20m is worth the effort the synth section

>>>>>>> sounds

>>>>>>> superb,my friend used to use that all the time,the only other

>>>>>>> synth/

>>>>>>> sampler I have used which had the a similar function was the  

>>>>>>> Korg

>>>>>>> DSS-1 (just usiing a slider) although there are a few programs

>>>>>>> for

>>>>>>> the

>>>>>>> Atari which allow you to draw a waveform as does the Roland

>>>>>>> samplers

>>>>>>> and the Fairlight of course.

>>>>>>> I think a PPG and possibly the Kawai K5 could do additive  

>>>>>>> drawing

>>>>>>> using a slider too.

>>>>>>> I know the FZ10m could be fitted with scsi because I saw one  

>>>>>>> in a

>>>>>>> studio in Islington London and I asked the engineer if I could

>>>>>>> have a

>>>>>>> look around the back because he was loading sounds to it from a

>>>>>>> Jaz

>>>>>>> drive.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> J

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> On 19 Oct 2012, at 00:18, charlie midi gfa wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> im sure the technicians will love me $$$ ,

>>>>>>>> and by now the prices of a

>>>>>>>> shugart to scsi adaptor has sky rocketed.....

>>>>>>>> so the raw image is it 1.68 Mb?

>>>>>>>> please go on jammie , do you use some of this technology

>>>>>>>> personally?

>>>>>>>> i am interested adapting

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> charles

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>>>>> From: "Jason Adkins" <jason_ralf808@...>

>>>>>>>> To: <CZsynth@yahoogroups.com>

>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:23 PM

>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> I don't agree,I think the FZ10m had a scsi option too.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> On 18 Oct 2012, at 19:43, jammie wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> its the floppy emulator image software that does a raw image

>>>>>>>>>> it

>>>>>>>>>> cant

>>>>>>>>>> be read by anything except the fz1/fz10/fz20

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> there is no other programs that can write the floppy image

>>>>>>>>>> back

>>>>>>>>>> to

>>>>>>>>>> the floppy becuase its a different speed

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> only the fz20 had scsi and its useless with out the floppy as

>>>>>>>>>> its a

>>>>>>>>>> floppy disk access program has to be loaded sop that the fz20

>>>>>>>>>> can

>>>>>>>>>> use the scsi

>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>>>>>>>> From: Jason Adkins

>>>>>>>>>> To: CZsynth@yahoogroups.com

>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:35 PM

>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CZsynth] casio fz10m

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Isn't there a PC program that will image FZ1/10m/20m  

>>>>>>>>>> floppies?

>>>>>>>>>> Is your FZ10m fitted with SCSI?

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> J

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2012, at 00:11, charlie midi gfa wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> so a little o.t.

>>>>>>>>>>> but

>>>>>>>>>>> anybody tell me what drive will work in a fz10m ,

>>>>>>>>>>> (cross reference the matsushita ju-255 )

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> i can't find suitable drive or a indentical one to repair  

>>>>>>>>>>> the

>>>>>>>>>>> fz10m

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> charles

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>>

>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> ------------------------------------

>>>>

>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

>>

>>

>>

>> ------------------------------------

>>

>> Yahoo! Groups Links

>>

>>

>>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>





    
     

    
    






  










[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.