Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:44 UTC

Thread

Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-20 by G

One feature that sounded interesting to me on the Roland video was 
the lack of the "machine gun" sound when playing fast. I can't 
remember what the Roland guy called it but as your playing speed 
increases, the attack decreases.I don't notice while I'm playing but 
when I listen to myself on a recording I notice alot of "machine gun" 
type sounds especialy on the snare. I hope the DTXtreme 2S has this 
feature.
Also those cymbal swells sounded sweet!!!

G

Re: Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-20 by moosetication

--- G wrote:
> I can't remember what the Roland guy called it but
> as your playing speed increases, the attack decreases.

Interval control - as the interval between successive triggers 
decreases, the attack phase is shortened (from the front, not the 
back, if you see what I mean).

Stewart

Re: Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-20 by emf

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "G" <kickflippin@h...> wrote:
> One feature that sounded interesting to me on the Roland video was 
> the lack of the "machine gun" sound when playing fast. I can't 
> remember what the Roland guy called it but as your playing speed 
> increases, the attack decreases.I don't notice while I'm playing 
but 
> when I listen to myself on a recording I notice alot of "machine 
gun" 
> type sounds especialy on the snare. I hope the DTXtreme 2S has this 
> feature.
> Also those cymbal swells sounded sweet!!!

I know what you mean. I'd like to hear what the Yamaha does, too. 
It's been said a lot lately, but listen to the relatively old ddrum 
module as well. It accomplishes what the Roland seems to on 
completely different principles (multisampling of each voice and 
analog triggering). To my mind, however, in more current terms, the 
DTXtremeIIS might well be the long-awaited happy alternative to the 
exorbitant Roland high end.

Ed

RE: [DTXpress] Re: Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-20 by rdamon@mckinney-usa.com

Speaking of multisampling/multi-layering. How many layers do each of you
think is enough for a particular voice. 

For example, with the Yamaha module you can have two voice layers per pad.
How many layers would each of you think it should be?

The reason I ask is, that with the anticipation of the up coming modules, I
will be adding one to my set. The total number of pads that I have are fine,
I will simply replace portions with the dtxtreme IIS. So my thoughts are to
take a typical pad say Tom1 and run it to two modules, thus allowing me to
assign up to four layers per tom1 (two layers on module 1 and two layers on
module 2). And in fact, if I wanted a real custom snare sound, I could run a
TP65S to three input triggers, say module 1, inputs 2,6,7 and end up with 6
layers assignable to the pad peizo and three layered voices per rim switch.

Just a fun question? Anybody?

OGD

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	emf [SMTP:liberatusvirus@...]
> Sent:	Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:48 PM
> To:	DTXpress@yahoogroups.com
> Subject:	[DTXpress] Re: Roland V-20  vs.  DTXtreme 2S
> 
> --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "G" <kickflippin@h...> wrote:
> > One feature that sounded interesting to me on the Roland video was 
> > the lack of the "machine gun" sound when playing fast. I can't 
> > remember what the Roland guy called it but as your playing speed 
> > increases, the attack decreases.I don't notice while I'm playing 
> but 
> > when I listen to myself on a recording I notice alot of "machine 
> gun" 
> > type sounds especialy on the snare. I hope the DTXtreme 2S has this 
> > feature.
> > Also those cymbal swells sounded sweet!!!
> 
> I know what you mean. I'd like to hear what the Yamaha does, too. 
> It's been said a lot lately, but listen to the relatively old ddrum 
> module as well. It accomplishes what the Roland seems to on 
> completely different principles (multisampling of each voice and 
> analog triggering). To my mind, however, in more current terms, the 
> DTXtremeIIS might well be the long-awaited happy alternative to the 
> exorbitant Roland high end.
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
 
**************************************************************************
The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only
for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

Re: Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-20 by moosetication

--- OGD wrote:
> How many layers do each of you
> think is enough for a particular voice. 

I've thought about this a few times, and had to come to the 
conclusion that I couldn't work out what I'd use more than two for - 
but probably because I've never had more than two! The DTX had five, 
didn't it?

I know one thing - you'd need a UI better than the DTXpress if you 
didn't want to end up on the funny farm...

Stewart

Re: Roland V-20 vs. DTXtreme 2S

2004-01-21 by emf

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, rdamon@m... wrote:
> Speaking of multisampling/multi-layering. How many layers do each 
of you
> think is enough for a particular voice. 
> 
> For example, with the Yamaha module you can have two voice layers 
per pad.

OGD,

The modules and trigger to midi interfaces that permitted multiple 
stacking of four or five notes usually also offered the ability to 
alternate them in various patterns to create percussive or musical 
loops. Obviously the DTXpress doesn't have that feature, in which 
case two layers seem adequate, but, as Zero Mostel said in the 
Producers, if you got it, flaunt it. You just might come up with 
something fantastic. Ddrum's multisampling doesn't have the same 
synthetic foundation. Its rationale was simply to make a particular 
drum or cymbal sound as natural as possible under various percussive, 
positional, and ambient conditions.

Ed

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.