hi Steve, Yes, metamerism, cross-over etc etc are bigger issues the nearer you get to neutral grey. e.g. a colour image with a magenta cast will not be noticed by everyone... but 'most' people will notice it is your image is predominantly 'grey'. So cross-over (where one area of a greyscale is e.g. magenta, another areas eg green) and metamerism are more of an issue. I have now sent you some samples, but to be honest... they are not representative of what I have achieved in the past... with a pro profile. Unfortunately, the pro profile lost it's avalidity when I was forced to swap printers (and actually, I moved from cart to a new CIS ink supply aswell) so just about everything changed that shouldn't for such a profile to work. RIP = Raster Image Processor. Yes, it would replace, or on occasion, be in addition to the Epson driver. There is a fine-line here. In my view, even the Piezo plugin (and in fact, the Epson printer driver) are RIPs because they process raster images (bitmap images) - but it is usually associated with higher-end products. I'm afraid I currently know little about (colour) RIPs, but the implication here is that they give you more control over the way ink is laid down by a printer. e.g. Epson printer driver does NOT allow you to control CMYK inks individually, but I believe a colour RIP 'should'. For RIP, read '???' (which probably won't come out on this email so read '$$$' instead) Referring back to point 1 - I hope you understand why I was not able to spend too much time improving the greyscale print samples! Best regards, nij > -----Original Message----- > From: scrber [mailto:stephen.bate@...] > Sent: 24 May 2002 13:00 > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Gen4 inkset for B&W > > > Right, thanks for the feedback. A couple more questions if you don't > mind. (please bear with me, I am new to this and promise I won't be > asking such seemingly daft questions in another months time or so!) > > 1 - If I was getting 'acceptable' prints from my colour dye set, why > would I not be equally as happy with the G4 set? Will something else > be different? Is 'metamerism'a bigger issue in B&W? > > 2 - GULP. What is an RIP (if there is an FAQ section I missed, > please point me there....), where do I get it/one & will it cost me > very much? Does my RIP replace the Espon driver? What about > profiles? > > 3 - My system is only 3 months old. If I had to buy another printer, > I may as well keep my colour one and go hextone for B&W. Can't > afford it for now. When I can, then the majority of the discussion > here will be of more relavence. > > > Thanks, > > Steve
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: Gen4 inkset for B&W
2002-05-24 by Nij
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.