On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 10:30, Paul Roark wrote: > Since it looks like we'll have a $69 printer that can do archival > carbon > printing soon without the need for Photoshop, the next question might > be > what image processing software I should recommend to non-expert > photographers without big budgets. > > It seems to me that for the genealogists and scrapbook fans, basic > tools in > an easy-to-use format and a price under $100 is needed. Some of the > programs that came up in my initial search were Ulead PhotoImpact 8, > Digital > Image Pro, and, of course, Adobe's Elements. (I must admit that I > have a > preference to see some company other than M$ or Adobe get more market > share > here.) > > Any thoughts? How about Qimage and ACDsee as possibilities? Roger > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls > and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish > to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting > this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to > keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject > header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the > various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Best Entry-level Image Processor?
2003-10-19 by Roger Sopher
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.