Thanks Paul, We can always count on you for a reasonable, level headed, as well as accurate view on the complex. Thanks again for your comments. Randy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Randy, > > Between the Pro and cheaper Picture Window (PW) program, the big difference > that I'm aware of is that the Pro version is 16 bit, the cheaper one is 8 > bit. > > The main reasons I PW as an alternative to PS is that it can use the curves > I use to control the inksets, and it is also a small competitor as opposed > to an Adobe or Microsoft. > > I think the "best" program is usually the one that you're most familiar > with. That is, with the learning curves being what they are, it's hard to > make a good comparison between two good programs that is not simply a > reflection of how well you know the particular programs. > > That said, I prefer Photoshop. However, with my workflow, the way PW opens > successive windows as you do things facilitates my use of the clone tool to > paint in just the amount of the affect I want. PW aligns the clone tool at > the corners of the frames very easily -- virtually automatically. With PS I > can use the History tool to do the same thing, but it takes a few more > keystrokes and is less intuitive. > > PW does not use layers. This is a minor inconvenience for me, but could be > a major problem for those who do composite images. I'm not an expert in PW, > so maybe there are good ways to do the same things in different ways. > > What really irks me about PS now is the new licensing scheme that would make > me buy multiple full-price copies to have copies on a laptop and secondary > PC. Because of this and the higher compatibility of the curves, I now use > PS 6 the most. I like PS CS/8 16 bit layers (never liked PS 7), but I only > use PS 8 when I need those 16 bit layers. If I had to live with only one > image editor, it would be PS 6. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > > ________________ > > -----Original Message----- > From: randy_rancier2004 [mailto:rrancier@b...] > Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 6:20 AM > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Digital BW] Picture Windows opinion > > Please, only comment on the Picture Window Program if you have at > least downloaded it and used it on more than one occasion. > > I want some opinions on "Picutre Window" from those of you that have > used the professional version of PhotoShop (not Elements) for a > while and understand its controls relatively well and have > given "Picture Windows" a fair shot. Hint: If you only used it on > one occasion or on someone elses compture; please don't comment. I > realize that this may tie many of your hands, but, I have found that > most that continually blast products, other than their favorite > products are usually narrow minded and don't know what the "H..." > their talking about. > > Also, if you know, please explain the difference between Picture > Window and Picture Window Pro; they don't explain on their website. > > From what I have read and have heard from some is that it sounds > like a good program that can be a lot simplier than the full blown > version of PhotoShop, but with a lot of control that you lose in > Photoshop Elements. > > Thanks > Randy > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as > they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same > page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the > membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from > the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, > GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE > POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY > TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR > ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY > THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER > MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Picture Windows opinion
2004-05-15 by Randy Rancier
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.