bhhc wrote: >Most of the translation engines are far from being useful . . . they give a "where is the bathroom?" interpretation at best. However for those who happen to understand the two languages involved, they are frequently the source of many hours of hysterical mis-interpretation . . . better than Leno, better than Letterman, better than Monty Python. > >I understand and speak French, and frankly was pleased to see a post in a different language. While I don't agree with our stupid laws here (Quebec), I do think the more languages you understand, or TRY to understand, the better you will be, SO . . . if Michel wishes to post in French, let him do so. If you don't like it, hide in the corner and don't read it . . . problem solved. > >Paul Aparycki > >p.s. the list guidelines don't mention anywhere the "decreed" languauge for posting . . . or is the internet now only "american"? > > Ik spreek ook Frans, dus ik kon die mail perfect lezen. Alleen denk ik dat gebruik van het Engels aangewezen is om zich voor iedereen verstaanbaar te maken. Ik ben vrij zeker dat u van deze mail geen jota begrijpt, daarom gebruik ik normaliter Engels als voertaal op het internet. :-) -- Hans Van Rafelghem http://www.vanrafelghem.com/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 2200 vs. 2000P
2004-10-12 by Hans Van Rafelghem
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.