Digital BW, The Print

Oops, as "koloshor" said, I meant that the 4000 replaced the 2200 that
I had been using.  Didn't mean to be unclear about that Seth.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "koloshor"
<wiz@n...> wrote:
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Seth"
> <seth@m...> wrote:
> >  This is VERY misleading to new folks and those that don't know
better.
> > 
> > The Epson 4000 did NOT replace the 2200 as a printer.  Only in some
> people's
> > workflow.
> > 
> > Epson still shows and sells both.
> 
> I don't find it VERY misleading, I read exactly what he meant, that a
> 4000 has replaced his 2200.