Digital Vs Film. I've just enjoyed David Sinai's Black Only print exchange...about half of the images originated in film. For various reasons, and but for one film image (mine..cropped from 800 color neg and desaturated) and one digital image (Steve K's), film seemed significantly sharper, having more tonal excitement, even in tiny 6X9 prints. PLEASE comment with different impressions! BO "grain", unlike film grain, remains fixed-size as the print size varies and in this case worked to the disadvantage of the exchange's little prints (8.5X11 paper, most prints under 6X9). The images would inescapably appear more "dotty" if they were smaller, and literally seem half as dotty at twice the size...unlike real grain on silver paper. I think this particular forum is already far too inkjet-technical to benefit by yet-further rambles into arcane and inevitably intensely consumerist digital camera discussions. So perhaps a parallel Yahoo forum would be good. The new Sony seems tempting...but will it tether to a laptop? John Kelly --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Do we need a new forum for discussions of digital capture as it relates to > B&W? Perhaps all image capture issues -- scanning, film, etc. -- should be > on a new forum? Is there a way to link thread to this one so that we don't > all have to monitor another forum to be alerted to a thread of interest?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] digital Vs film: black only
2005-09-08 by djon43
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.