Remember there are two sides here. Any colour management capable system will have at least one default monitor profile (which likely changes depending on the sort of monitor detected, eg Powerbook Display vs Apple Cinema Display). When PS (or PS Elements) receives an untagged document it needs to give it a profile for display and will default to the default workspace. The CMM then uses this default workspace and colour manages the transform to the default display profile. You always need two profiles, a source and a destination. > From: dlruckus <dlruckus@...> > Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:04:32 -0000 > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> > Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Comparison: K3 versus Ultrachrome inks on Semi-Matte > + ImagePri > > Paul, That is my understanding of things as well. There seems to be a > system default monitor profile (I too have heard mention of windows > being 2.2). If you have installed drivers etc along with your monitor, > that may have also set up an oem screen profile. Then ,of course, you > have the deliberate profiling via software such as Pshop or through > pucks and i1's etc. > > Regards > Duane > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" > <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > >> >> In talking to a forum member off list, I think I agree with him that the >> system has loaded a profile into the Color folder that is > controlling the >> monitor out of the box. If one uses a profiling program for the > monitor, >> that software is probably in control of the default monitor settings. >> >> Paul >> www.PaulRoark.com >> > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Comparison: K3 versus Ultrachrome inks on Semi-Matte + ImagePri
2005-11-22 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.