I didn't know that they didn't resuse the materials? Come to think of it they would be difficult to clean out and a costly endeavor. If that IS accurate then the whole Epson Recycling Program is a total fraud and should be exposed as such! Putting waste into the air rather than landfils isn't accomplishing anything but an illusion of environmental responsibility (what else is new). If what you say is true that's pretty significant for the arguement for a refillable system, which is really what we should have for everything. john --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Matt Haber" <matt@...> wrote: > > John, as a reminder, Epson's "recycling" program appears to simply > gather the carts and send them to an incinerator. > > All municipal recycling programs that I am award of divert material > that is to be considered recycled to a secondary use (depending on > the type of material...some, like aluminum, can go back to primary > use, while plastics usually result in lower grade plastic). Remaining > material is sent to disposal at a landfill or incinerator*. > > -matt > > *some of these incinerators recover heat for electricity or steam. > >However, I'm not sure how you get them on that > > basis when they cleaverly set up this "recycling program" for used > > carats recently that covers them on that basis. I don't think that was > > designed to protect the ground water. > > > > john > X-PMFLAGS: 16384 0 1 INETSIG.PMS > > -- > Matt Haber > dance, portrait and fashion photography > http://www.matthaber.com >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Epson's court victory
2007-11-04 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.