Hi Mike, for a bright white paper, I've been very happy with PremierArt Premium Matte - but that's been replaced by Presentation Matte now, which is much lighter at 180gsm and only single-sided - but it should look at least as good as the old paper if you don't mind the lighter weight. It had good dmax for a mat paper. Richard At 06:04 a.m. Sunday 1/11/2009, you wrote: >Mike, > >For inexpensive matt paper you might want to try Red River paper, Aurora >Fine Art Natural. The blacks are not as good as HPR but makes a good testing >paper and gives very useable results. I think they have sample packs >available. > >Gary Wagner > >garywagner.com > >From: <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike >Johnston >Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:26 AM >To: <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com >Subject: [Digital BW] good inexpensive matt paper? > >Hi, >I am an amateur photographer. >I have been using low end Epson printers with MIS ink for >around 5 years. I have been using Kirkland glossy photo paper - it is very >inexpensive and gives good results. > >I am thinking of moving to a new printer and Piezography inks. >For the lower priced set ups I don't think these inks support glossy paper. > >The question is, what is a good inexpensive matt (or luster?) paper I can >use? > >Thanks >Mike Johnston > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > ____________ http://www.richardsmallfield.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] good inexpensive matt paper?
2009-10-31 by Richard Smallfield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.