Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] good inexpensive matt paper?

2009-10-31 by Richard Smallfield

Hi Mike,
for a bright white paper, I've been very happy with PremierArt Premium Matte - but that's been replaced by Presentation Matte now, which is much lighter at 180gsm and only single-sided - but it should look at least as good as the old paper if you don't mind the lighter weight. It had good dmax for a mat paper.

Richard

At 06:04 a.m. Sunday 1/11/2009, you wrote:
>Mike,
>
>For inexpensive matt paper you might want to try Red River paper, Aurora
>Fine Art Natural. The blacks are not as good as HPR but makes a good testing
>paper and gives very useable results. I think they have sample packs
>available.
>
>Gary Wagner
>
>garywagner.com 
>
>From: <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike
>Johnston
>Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 9:26 AM
>To: <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com>DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [Digital BW] good inexpensive matt paper?
>
>Hi,
>I am an amateur photographer.
>I have been using low end Epson printers with MIS ink for
>around 5 years. I have been using Kirkland glossy photo paper - it is very
>inexpensive and gives good results.
>
>I am thinking of moving to a new printer and Piezography inks.
>For the lower priced set ups I don't think these inks support glossy paper.
>
>The question is, what is a good inexpensive matt (or luster?) paper I can
>use?
>
>Thanks
>Mike Johnston
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>


____________
http://www.richardsmallfield.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.