Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by Gary Brown

<I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...



That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99 (37C), with 8% humidity.


Gary

baffin@...
www.garyallenbrownphoto.com






   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by R.Ternbach

I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
dust spread by your humidifier?
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
> like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
> it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
>
>
>
> That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
> (37C), with 8% humidity.
>
>
> Gary
>
> baffin@...
> www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by piezobw

I would hope, in that case, you print with a swamp cooler!

Jon Cone

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Brown" <baffin@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
> 
> 
> 
> That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99 (37C), with 8% humidity.
> 
> 
> Gary
> 
> baffin@...
> www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by piezobw

Hi rudy,

Everyone knows us as ink merchants, but really I am a printmaker first...and I keep a meticulous print studio which I founded in 1980. It's separate from InkjetMall. It's called Cone Editions Press. All of my printers are "named" so that we can track their maintenance and behaviors when we move them from one part of the studio to another. We have many many LF printers and many many MF printers that have the same model numbers, so this naming is important. It's actually a holdover from when I ran seven IRIS 3047 printers here - each with a mind of its own. My Hell scanner is called "Helga" because she weighs (literally) one ton and one half. 

But our central temperature and humidity gauge is named, in big block letters..."GOD". For it is this great big beautiful mystery of air that circulates and changes daily that is responsible for all that happens in our studio from a day to day perspective. Humidity is critical to printer happiness...  This is not to say that someone printing at 6% humidity suddenly experiences meltdown...

But, the key to consistency in everything is to maintain a studio's environment. I may be a little retensive about it because of a photogravure background in which breaking the humidity/temp rules destroyed any resemblance of actually getting the process to work... a half degree of temperature or humidity made huge changes when trying to bite extremely delicate tone.

In inkjet - you do not just have a printer to deal with, you also have paper. The printer's head is prone to drying out (slightly) as is the capping station when its excessively dry. The paper itself will absorb less or more ink (whether it's coated or not...) depending upon how much moisture is present, and whether its been subjected to swings or extremes...

We use two rather large humidifiers that have removable filters. The models are "Honeywell HCM-6011i QuietCare 11-Gallon Console Humidifier with Air Washing Technology" and we paid $109 each with free shipping from Amazon. We are not on city water and we do have minerals in our water, but the filters seem so far, to keep them off of everything. 

My main print studio is 24' x 36' with 10' ceilings. It is post and beam and has solid foam stress skin panels for the walls which means it is very, very air-tight. I use an air to air heat exchanger for ventilation and baseboard hot water heat. However, with so many printers and computers running and such efficient structure - we do not actually have to heat it in the winter (or very rarely...).

These humidifiers can keep us at 35% when the air is 15-20% - and it can achieve it within just a few hours. The 2 x 11 gallons can run out overnight. I wish I had bought the larger models.

If repeatability is critical to your work (for instance if you print for clients who re-order, or you need to match prints you've previously made that are very sensitive) you should maintain environment. It is bad enough that you have to deal with paper from all of the manufacturers that are subject to so much variation.

When I find a paper I like (for the studio) - I tend to buy alot at once and try to buy the same lot#s if the manufacturer uses it. Because I make ink I have more control over that type of consistency - but we note changes in draw-downs on OEM just as one would nearly any company in the ink business. We only use Epson inks for testing - rather than production - but the inks that I do buy for production from other manufacturers (like Roland), I tend to buy in quantities that will last me through the year.

We do everything we can to maintain consistency because we print professionally. For my own personal studio, I am much more lax about things. I tend not to edition my own work, and when I do I often revisit the photo from living with it. So, I deal with issues as they arise, and print a little like a mad-man (and a messy madman at that). When I print for others, I treat the process much more like a religious ceremony filled with rituals that I follow (for consistency in case I am asked to repeat my efforts.)

A really bad day is humidity in the 65% range or 15% range. We will see some sort of issue whether its more frequent cleaning between prints or micro-banding. Not always...but prolonged over a period - then we do...  These are usually at the tail end of weather patterns that are conducive to printing without cooling, heating, or humidifying.

Within the main print studio, we have two air-conditioners which tend to run from June through September to help bring the humidity down to our sweet spot of about 35%. In my private studio I keep an a/c as well.

I hope my attention to humidity will help others who have not particularly given this much thought. We do not have very much technical support for Piezography and ConeColor inks. But, more than half of the support we do give is environmental, and the victims of it never even knew what hit them. We often ask environmental questions right up front with frequent head cleanings or banding that is not obvious (due to incorrect cartridge setup and installations). 

Unfortunately, humidity and temperature are sometimes impossible for my customers to control.

By the way - dried out capping stations can introduce all kinds of issues such as clogging and banding...check our video at InkjetMall.com for what we believe is the best way to maintain desktop printers - we will post the large format version shortly...Also for those that do email into techsupport - you can meet the video version of Dana. 

http://tinyurl.com/epson-desktop-printer-cleaning

Jon Cone
Piezography


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "R.Ternbach" <RT@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
> dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
> following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
> If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
> dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
> dust spread by your humidifier?
> 
> > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
> > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
> > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
> >
> >
> >
> > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
> > (37C), with 8% humidity.
> >
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > baffin@...
> > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by mrjimbo

Lack of humidity is an incredible issue.. I'm in south west Montana in a high desert area  (5200 feet)  and we get a fair amount of wind to boot in the winters.. My studio was built very tight but it doesn't matter it's still  low humidity.. I see 8 to 15 all the time.. Part of the issue is that if your rooms are fairly large it just takes to much moisture to raise it effectively.. We have 4 Bionaire W-7's in the studio but generally only two are running at a time..( the other two are for spares) When it's gets down to 12 the humidifiers just can't keep up..  Two years ago I had a vapor system put in the computer and printer rooms.. Basically it's a super high pressure small pump that pumps the water thru stainless lines to where you have tiny carbide nozzles.. This thing honestly works and gets turned on when the humidity gets below 25% here.. The humidifiers can keep up if it's over that.  It's actually bigger issue then plugged nozzles etc ..on the printers .Many materials just won't feed unless they can "relax" and they need some humidity to do that.. I was stuck and just had to do something and I didn't want to move to another area .. Those that are fortunate and don't have this issue probably don't realize how frustrating and costly it really is... If your system fails or shuts off for a few days the print heads dry out on Epson's and it is really a chore to get the system back on track.. not to mention wasted inks and waste tank space. Beyond that many of the material's I typically use have to have the humidity to just relax and lay down as they feed thru the printer to avoid head strikes or loading issues.. Honestly a drag..

jimbo
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: piezobw 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 11:24 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] low humidity


    
  I would hope, in that case, you print with a swamp cooler!

  Jon Cone

  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Brown" <baffin@...> wrote:
  >
  > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99 (37C), with 8% humidity.
  > 
  > 
  > Gary
  > 
  > baffin@...
  > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by Gary Brown

I print with a 3800 and really don't do anything different because of the low humidity. I keep the printer covered except when I'm printing and blow off the printer (with compressed air) before I print. Living in a desert environment, dust can be more of an issue. A few months a year, known as the "Monsoon Season" the humidity is higher, also after a rain storm. We average about 7" of rain a year and compared to what most people associate with monsoon, I'm not sure why they call it that. I print fairly often. I do occasional head cleanings, nothing really extraordinary.

I wish I could be more help. Maybe I'm just lucky.

Gary

baffin@...

http://wwwgaryallenbrownphoto.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: R.Ternbach 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:49 AM
  Subject: [Digital BW] low humidity


    
  I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
  dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
  following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
  If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
  dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
  dust spread by your humidifier?

  > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
  > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
  > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
  > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
  > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
  >
  >
  >
  > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
  > (37C), with 8% humidity.
  >
  >
  > Gary
  >
  > baffin@...
  > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  >
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by R.Ternbach

I've had ultrasonic humidifiers that promised to be free of mineral dust
but that wasn't the case. I think next winter I'll try a slant fin
humidifier with UV light. It's not expensive and it's worth a try. If I
were in a large room or studio in a very dry climate I would try
constructing a humidity controlled space in a cabinet or closet for the
printers if needed.

Rudy
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I print with a 3800 and really don't do anything different because of the
> low humidity. I keep the printer covered except when I'm printing and blow
> off the printer (with compressed air) before I print. Living in a desert
> environment, dust can be more of an issue. A few months a year, known as
> the "Monsoon Season" the humidity is higher, also after a rain storm. We
> average about 7" of rain a year and compared to what most people associate
> with monsoon, I'm not sure why they call it that. I print fairly often. I
> do occasional head cleanings, nothing really extraordinary.
>
> I wish I could be more help. Maybe I'm just lucky.
>
> Gary
>
> baffin@...
>
> http://wwwgaryallenbrownphoto.com
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: R.Ternbach
>   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:49 AM
>   Subject: [Digital BW] low humidity
>
>
>
>   I live in Western Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
>   dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
>   following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to
> print?
>   If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
>   dimineralized water in your humidifier? Do you have a problem with
> mineral
>   dust spread by your humidifier?
>
>   > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
>   > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
>   > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads.
> We
>   > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping
> station. If
>   > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print
> heads...
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high
> 99
>   > (37C), with 8% humidity.
>   >
>   >
>   > Gary
>   >
>   > baffin@...
>   > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   >
>   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>   >
>   >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] low humidity

2010-05-20 by piezobw

I just recalled something of interest...

We troubleshooted a number of customers this past winter with missing nozzle issues - and those we could not fix in the normal ways, we found out had their printers near heat vents that were blowing warm air up and into the printer. Moving the printer or sealing off the heat vent fixed the missing nozzle gaps...

It's worth mentioning...

Jon Cone
Piezography

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "R.Ternbach" <RT@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I've had ultrasonic humidifiers that promised to be free of mineral dust
> but that wasn't the case. I think next winter I'll try a slant fin
> humidifier with UV light. It's not expensive and it's worth a try. If I
> were in a large room or studio in a very dry climate I would try
> constructing a humidity controlled space in a cabinet or closet for the
> printers if needed.
> 
> Rudy
> 
> 
> 
> > I print with a 3800 and really don't do anything different because of the
> > low humidity. I keep the printer covered except when I'm printing and blow
> > off the printer (with compressed air) before I print. Living in a desert
> > environment, dust can be more of an issue. A few months a year, known as
> > the "Monsoon Season" the humidity is higher, also after a rain storm. We
> > average about 7" of rain a year and compared to what most people associate
> > with monsoon, I'm not sure why they call it that. I print fairly often. I
> > do occasional head cleanings, nothing really extraordinary.
> >
> > I wish I could be more help. Maybe I'm just lucky.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > baffin@...
> >
> > http://wwwgaryallenbrownphoto.com
> >
> >   ----- Original Message -----
> >   From: R.Ternbach
> >   To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> >   Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 7:49 AM
> >   Subject: [Digital BW] low humidity
> >
> >
> >
> >   I live in Western Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
> >   dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
> >   following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to
> > print?
> >   If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
> >   dimineralized water in your humidifier? Do you have a problem with
> > mineral
> >   dust spread by your humidifier?
> >
> >   > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> >   > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> >   > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads.
> > We
> >   > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping
> > station. If
> >   > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print
> > heads...
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high
> > 99
> >   > (37C), with 8% humidity.
> >   >
> >   >
> >   > Gary
> >   >
> >   > baffin@...
> >   > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   >
> >   > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >   >
> >   >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
>

Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by Rudy Ternbach

Jon,

I'm in the planning phase of setting up a small studio at home for photopolymer gravure and digital printing. I understand the importance of keeping temperature and humidity within tight limits when doing copperplate gravure but that is only one of the Top Ten Reasons I won't be setting up to do traditional gravure in my own studio. In a studio with just two or three small to medium format printers a closet or fume hood type cabinet might be easier, and cheaper, to control  and this is something I am currently considering.  In any case,  It sounds like a visit to Cone Editions Press would prove a valuable learning experience for me at this juncture. 

Best regards,

Rudy


On May 20, 2010, at 2:06 PM, piezobw wrote:

> Hi rudy,
> 
> Everyone knows us as ink merchants, but really I am a printmaker first...and I keep a meticulous print studio which I founded in 1980. It's separate from InkjetMall. It's called Cone Editions Press. All of my printers are "named" so that we can track their maintenance and behaviors when we move them from one part of the studio to another. We have many many LF printers and many many MF printers that have the same model numbers, so this naming is important. It's actually a holdover from when I ran seven IRIS 3047 printers here - each with a mind of its own. My Hell scanner is called "Helga" because she weighs (literally) one ton and one half. 
> 
> But our central temperature and humidity gauge is named, in big block letters..."GOD". For it is this great big beautiful mystery of air that circulates and changes daily that is responsible for all that happens in our studio from a day to day perspective. Humidity is critical to printer happiness... This is not to say that someone printing at 6% humidity suddenly experiences meltdown...
> 
> But, the key to consistency in everything is to maintain a studio's environment. I may be a little retensive about it because of a photogravure background in which breaking the humidity/temp rules destroyed any resemblance of actually getting the process to work... a half degree of temperature or humidity made huge changes when trying to bite extremely delicate tone.
> 
> In inkjet - you do not just have a printer to deal with, you also have paper. The printer's head is prone to drying out (slightly) as is the capping station when its excessively dry. The paper itself will absorb less or more ink (whether it's coated or not...) depending upon how much moisture is present, and whether its been subjected to swings or extremes...
> 
> We use two rather large humidifiers that have removable filters. The models are "Honeywell HCM-6011i QuietCare 11-Gallon Console Humidifier with Air Washing Technology" and we paid $109 each with free shipping from Amazon. We are not on city water and we do have minerals in our water, but the filters seem so far, to keep them off of everything. 
> 
> My main print studio is 24' x 36' with 10' ceilings. It is post and beam and has solid foam stress skin panels for the walls which means it is very, very air-tight. I use an air to air heat exchanger for ventilation and baseboard hot water heat. However, with so many printers and computers running and such efficient structure - we do not actually have to heat it in the winter (or very rarely...).
> 
> These humidifiers can keep us at 35% when the air is 15-20% - and it can achieve it within just a few hours. The 2 x 11 gallons can run out overnight. I wish I had bought the larger models.
> 
> If repeatability is critical to your work (for instance if you print for clients who re-order, or you need to match prints you've previously made that are very sensitive) you should maintain environment. It is bad enough that you have to deal with paper from all of the manufacturers that are subject to so much variation.
> 
> When I find a paper I like (for the studio) - I tend to buy alot at once and try to buy the same lot#s if the manufacturer uses it. Because I make ink I have more control over that type of consistency - but we note changes in draw-downs on OEM just as one would nearly any company in the ink business. We only use Epson inks for testing - rather than production - but the inks that I do buy for production from other manufacturers (like Roland), I tend to buy in quantities that will last me through the year.
> 
> We do everything we can to maintain consistency because we print professionally. For my own personal studio, I am much more lax about things. I tend not to edition my own work, and when I do I often revisit the photo from living with it. So, I deal with issues as they arise, and print a little like a mad-man (and a messy madman at that). When I print for others, I treat the process much more like a religious ceremony filled with rituals that I follow (for consistency in case I am asked to repeat my efforts.)
> 
> A really bad day is humidity in the 65% range or 15% range. We will see some sort of issue whether its more frequent cleaning between prints or micro-banding. Not always...but prolonged over a period - then we do... These are usually at the tail end of weather patterns that are conducive to printing without cooling, heating, or humidifying.
> 
> Within the main print studio, we have two air-conditioners which tend to run from June through September to help bring the humidity down to our sweet spot of about 35%. In my private studio I keep an a/c as well.
> 
> I hope my attention to humidity will help others who have not particularly given this much thought. We do not have very much technical support for Piezography and ConeColor inks. But, more than half of the support we do give is environmental, and the victims of it never even knew what hit them. We often ask environmental questions right up front with frequent head cleanings or banding that is not obvious (due to incorrect cartridge setup and installations). 
> 
> Unfortunately, humidity and temperature are sometimes impossible for my customers to control.
> 
> By the way - dried out capping stations can introduce all kinds of issues such as clogging and banding...check our video at InkjetMall.com for what we believe is the best way to maintain desktop printers - we will post the large format version shortly...Also for those that do email into techsupport - you can meet the video version of Dana. 
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/epson-desktop-printer-cleaning
> 
> Jon Cone
> Piezography
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "R.Ternbach" <RT@...> wrote:
> >
> > I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
> > dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
> > following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
> > If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
> > dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
> > dust spread by your humidifier?
> > 
> > > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> > > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> > > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
> > > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
> > > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
> > > (37C), with 8% humidity.
> > >
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > baffin@...
> > > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by piezobw

Rudy,

When I moved to Vermont from NYC 21 years ago, I brought my entire photogravure setup including my steel facing equipment for the copper plates. I had to build a plastic coated room to contain the environment and ran a humidifier in conjunction with a dehumidifier. It was a nightmare. My Port Chester, NY studio was much easier to control for some reason.

I will caution you that most if not all of the modern inkjet paper coatings are very sensitive to fumes. I'm not certain if you mean by having a ventilation hood that you also envision having to exhaust some fumes that you deem harmful to yourself.

The caution is the paper will yellow if subjected to many chemical fumes. So in planning - digital and analog processes should be separated.

You're welcome to call in and let us know when you want to drop by. Lots to see here. Also, we give one on one two day trainings if it behooves you. Dana even shows how to maintain the printers. It's very comprehensive.

Jon Cone
Piezography 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Rudy Ternbach <RT@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Jon,
> 
> I'm in the planning phase of setting up a small studio at home for photopolymer gravure and digital printing. I understand the importance of keeping temperature and humidity within tight limits when doing copperplate gravure but that is only one of the Top Ten Reasons I won't be setting up to do traditional gravure in my own studio. In a studio with just two or three small to medium format printers a closet or fume hood type cabinet might be easier, and cheaper, to control  and this is something I am currently considering.  In any case,  It sounds like a visit to Cone Editions Press would prove a valuable learning experience for me at this juncture. 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Rudy
> 
> 
> On May 20, 2010, at 2:06 PM, piezobw wrote:
> 
> > Hi rudy,
> > 
> > Everyone knows us as ink merchants, but really I am a printmaker first...and I keep a meticulous print studio which I founded in 1980. It's separate from InkjetMall. It's called Cone Editions Press. All of my printers are "named" so that we can track their maintenance and behaviors when we move them from one part of the studio to another. We have many many LF printers and many many MF printers that have the same model numbers, so this naming is important. It's actually a holdover from when I ran seven IRIS 3047 printers here - each with a mind of its own. My Hell scanner is called "Helga" because she weighs (literally) one ton and one half. 
> > 
> > But our central temperature and humidity gauge is named, in big block letters..."GOD". For it is this great big beautiful mystery of air that circulates and changes daily that is responsible for all that happens in our studio from a day to day perspective. Humidity is critical to printer happiness... This is not to say that someone printing at 6% humidity suddenly experiences meltdown...
> > 
> > But, the key to consistency in everything is to maintain a studio's environment. I may be a little retensive about it because of a photogravure background in which breaking the humidity/temp rules destroyed any resemblance of actually getting the process to work... a half degree of temperature or humidity made huge changes when trying to bite extremely delicate tone.
> > 
> > In inkjet - you do not just have a printer to deal with, you also have paper. The printer's head is prone to drying out (slightly) as is the capping station when its excessively dry. The paper itself will absorb less or more ink (whether it's coated or not...) depending upon how much moisture is present, and whether its been subjected to swings or extremes...
> > 
> > We use two rather large humidifiers that have removable filters. The models are "Honeywell HCM-6011i QuietCare 11-Gallon Console Humidifier with Air Washing Technology" and we paid $109 each with free shipping from Amazon. We are not on city water and we do have minerals in our water, but the filters seem so far, to keep them off of everything. 
> > 
> > My main print studio is 24' x 36' with 10' ceilings. It is post and beam and has solid foam stress skin panels for the walls which means it is very, very air-tight. I use an air to air heat exchanger for ventilation and baseboard hot water heat. However, with so many printers and computers running and such efficient structure - we do not actually have to heat it in the winter (or very rarely...).
> > 
> > These humidifiers can keep us at 35% when the air is 15-20% - and it can achieve it within just a few hours. The 2 x 11 gallons can run out overnight. I wish I had bought the larger models.
> > 
> > If repeatability is critical to your work (for instance if you print for clients who re-order, or you need to match prints you've previously made that are very sensitive) you should maintain environment. It is bad enough that you have to deal with paper from all of the manufacturers that are subject to so much variation.
> > 
> > When I find a paper I like (for the studio) - I tend to buy alot at once and try to buy the same lot#s if the manufacturer uses it. Because I make ink I have more control over that type of consistency - but we note changes in draw-downs on OEM just as one would nearly any company in the ink business. We only use Epson inks for testing - rather than production - but the inks that I do buy for production from other manufacturers (like Roland), I tend to buy in quantities that will last me through the year.
> > 
> > We do everything we can to maintain consistency because we print professionally. For my own personal studio, I am much more lax about things. I tend not to edition my own work, and when I do I often revisit the photo from living with it. So, I deal with issues as they arise, and print a little like a mad-man (and a messy madman at that). When I print for others, I treat the process much more like a religious ceremony filled with rituals that I follow (for consistency in case I am asked to repeat my efforts.)
> > 
> > A really bad day is humidity in the 65% range or 15% range. We will see some sort of issue whether its more frequent cleaning between prints or micro-banding. Not always...but prolonged over a period - then we do... These are usually at the tail end of weather patterns that are conducive to printing without cooling, heating, or humidifying.
> > 
> > Within the main print studio, we have two air-conditioners which tend to run from June through September to help bring the humidity down to our sweet spot of about 35%. In my private studio I keep an a/c as well.
> > 
> > I hope my attention to humidity will help others who have not particularly given this much thought. We do not have very much technical support for Piezography and ConeColor inks. But, more than half of the support we do give is environmental, and the victims of it never even knew what hit them. We often ask environmental questions right up front with frequent head cleanings or banding that is not obvious (due to incorrect cartridge setup and installations). 
> > 
> > Unfortunately, humidity and temperature are sometimes impossible for my customers to control.
> > 
> > By the way - dried out capping stations can introduce all kinds of issues such as clogging and banding...check our video at InkjetMall.com for what we believe is the best way to maintain desktop printers - we will post the large format version shortly...Also for those that do email into techsupport - you can meet the video version of Dana. 
> > 
> > http://tinyurl.com/epson-desktop-printer-cleaning
> > 
> > Jon Cone
> > Piezography
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "R.Ternbach" <RT@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
> > > dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
> > > following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
> > > If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
> > > dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
> > > dust spread by your humidifier?
> > > 
> > > > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> > > > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> > > > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
> > > > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
> > > > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
> > > > (37C), with 8% humidity.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > >
> > > > baffin@
> > > > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by Dave

On May 20, 2010, at 9:46 PM, piezobw wrote:

>  I had to build a plastic coated room to contain the environment and  
> ran a humidifier in conjunction with a dehumidifier.


C'mon Jon - we all know that's an old Steven Wright line...  ;-)
"For my birthday I got a humidifier and a dehumidifier. I put them in  
the same room and let them fight it out."


Dave
http://www.davereichertphoto.com/

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by Rudy Ternbach

Jon,

Thanks for the info about coated papers and chemical fumes but I was thinking of a fume hood design only because it is a smaller volume of air to control . e.g. http://www.longolabs.com/moreFumeHoodImages.php  and
http://tocatchme.com/wastepics/fumehood.jpg  are what I had in mind. Finding one that's affordable could prove difficult so I may kluge something together instead.  

Regards.

Rudy

 
Rudy,
> 
> 
> When I moved to Vermont from NYC 21 years ago, I brought my entire photogravure setup including my steel facing equipment for the copper plates. I had to build a plastic coated room to contain the environment and ran a humidifier in conjunction with a dehumidifier. It was a nightmare. My Port Chester, NY studio was much easier to control for some reason.
> 
> I will caution you that most if not all of the modern inkjet paper coatings are very sensitive to fumes. I'm not certain if you mean by having a ventilation hood that you also envision having to exhaust some fumes that you deem harmful to yourself.
> 
> The caution is the paper will yellow if subjected to many chemical fumes. So in planning - digital and analog processes should be separated.
> 
> You're welcome to call in and let us know when you want to drop by. Lots to see here. Also, we give one on one two day trainings if it behooves you. Dana even shows how to maintain the printers. It's very comprehensive.
> 
> Jon Cone
> Piezography 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Rudy Ternbach <RT@...> wrote:
> >
> > Jon,
> > 
> > I'm in the planning phase of setting up a small studio at home for photopolymer gravure and digital printing. I understand the importance of keeping temperature and humidity within tight limits when doing copperplate gravure but that is only one of the Top Ten Reasons I won't be setting up to do traditional gravure in my own studio. In a studio with just two or three small to medium format printers a closet or fume hood type cabinet might be easier, and cheaper, to control and this is something I am currently considering. In any case, It sounds like a visit to Cone Editions Press would prove a valuable learning experience for me at this juncture. 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Rudy
> > 
> > 
> > On May 20, 2010, at 2:06 PM, piezobw wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi rudy,
> > > 
> > > Everyone knows us as ink merchants, but really I am a printmaker first...and I keep a meticulous print studio which I founded in 1980. It's separate from InkjetMall. It's called Cone Editions Press. All of my printers are "named" so that we can track their maintenance and behaviors when we move them from one part of the studio to another. We have many many LF printers and many many MF printers that have the same model numbers, so this naming is important. It's actually a holdover from when I ran seven IRIS 3047 printers here - each with a mind of its own. My Hell scanner is called "Helga" because she weighs (literally) one ton and one half. 
> > > 
> > > But our central temperature and humidity gauge is named, in big block letters..."GOD". For it is this great big beautiful mystery of air that circulates and changes daily that is responsible for all that happens in our studio from a day to day perspective. Humidity is critical to printer happiness... This is not to say that someone printing at 6% humidity suddenly experiences meltdown...
> > > 
> > > But, the key to consistency in everything is to maintain a studio's environment. I may be a little retensive about it because of a photogravure background in which breaking the humidity/temp rules destroyed any resemblance of actually getting the process to work... a half degree of temperature or humidity made huge changes when trying to bite extremely delicate tone.
> > > 
> > > In inkjet - you do not just have a printer to deal with, you also have paper. The printer's head is prone to drying out (slightly) as is the capping station when its excessively dry. The paper itself will absorb less or more ink (whether it's coated or not...) depending upon how much moisture is present, and whether its been subjected to swings or extremes...
> > > 
> > > We use two rather large humidifiers that have removable filters. The models are "Honeywell HCM-6011i QuietCare 11-Gallon Console Humidifier with Air Washing Technology" and we paid $109 each with free shipping from Amazon. We are not on city water and we do have minerals in our water, but the filters seem so far, to keep them off of everything. 
> > > 
> > > My main print studio is 24' x 36' with 10' ceilings. It is post and beam and has solid foam stress skin panels for the walls which means it is very, very air-tight. I use an air to air heat exchanger for ventilation and baseboard hot water heat. However, with so many printers and computers running and such efficient structure - we do not actually have to heat it in the winter (or very rarely...).
> > > 
> > > These humidifiers can keep us at 35% when the air is 15-20% - and it can achieve it within just a few hours. The 2 x 11 gallons can run out overnight. I wish I had bought the larger models.
> > > 
> > > If repeatability is critical to your work (for instance if you print for clients who re-order, or you need to match prints you've previously made that are very sensitive) you should maintain environment. It is bad enough that you have to deal with paper from all of the manufacturers that are subject to so much variation.
> > > 
> > > When I find a paper I like (for the studio) - I tend to buy alot at once and try to buy the same lot#s if the manufacturer uses it. Because I make ink I have more control over that type of consistency - but we note changes in draw-downs on OEM just as one would nearly any company in the ink business. We only use Epson inks for testing - rather than production - but the inks that I do buy for production from other manufacturers (like Roland), I tend to buy in quantities that will last me through the year.
> > > 
> > > We do everything we can to maintain consistency because we print professionally. For my own personal studio, I am much more lax about things. I tend not to edition my own work, and when I do I often revisit the photo from living with it. So, I deal with issues as they arise, and print a little like a mad-man (and a messy madman at that). When I print for others, I treat the process much more like a religious ceremony filled with rituals that I follow (for consistency in case I am asked to repeat my efforts.)
> > > 
> > > A really bad day is humidity in the 65% range or 15% range. We will see some sort of issue whether its more frequent cleaning between prints or micro-banding. Not always...but prolonged over a period - then we do... These are usually at the tail end of weather patterns that are conducive to printing without cooling, heating, or humidifying.
> > > 
> > > Within the main print studio, we have two air-conditioners which tend to run from June through September to help bring the humidity down to our sweet spot of about 35%. In my private studio I keep an a/c as well.
> > > 
> > > I hope my attention to humidity will help others who have not particularly given this much thought. We do not have very much technical support for Piezography and ConeColor inks. But, more than half of the support we do give is environmental, and the victims of it never even knew what hit them. We often ask environmental questions right up front with frequent head cleanings or banding that is not obvious (due to incorrect cartridge setup and installations). 
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, humidity and temperature are sometimes impossible for my customers to control.
> > > 
> > > By the way - dried out capping stations can introduce all kinds of issues such as clogging and banding...check our video at InkjetMall.com for what we believe is the best way to maintain desktop printers - we will post the large format version shortly...Also for those that do email into techsupport - you can meet the video version of Dana. 
> > > 
> > > http://tinyurl.com/epson-desktop-printer-cleaning
> > > 
> > > Jon Cone
> > > Piezography
> > > 
> > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "R.Ternbach" <RT@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I live in ern Massachusetts where we need to humidify in winter and
> > > > dehumidify in summer. So I'm interested in learning from you the
> > > > following: --What do you do about the low humidity when you want to print?
> > > > If you humidify--What kind of humidifier do you use? Do you use
> > > > dimineralized water in you humidifier? Do you have a problem with mineral
> > > > dust spread by your humidifier?
> > > > 
> > > > > <I would not think that excessive or inadequate humidity is a problem
> > > > > anywhere in the USA at this month - but check your environment to make
> > > > > sure that you're not below 20% humidity which will dry <out the heads. We
> > > > > like to stay above 30% and below 55%. Also, clean your capping station. If
> > > > > it can not seal properly, it can introduce air into your print heads...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That is, unless you live in Phoenix (Arizona). Today's projected high 99
> > > > > (37C), with 8% humidity.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > > > > baffin@
> > > > > www.garyallenbrownphoto.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by piezobw

Did you ever stop to think that Steven Wright may not have been born a comedian... He may have been driven mad by trying to perfect the aquatint photogravure method...

And now as he tries in vain to explain his life to audiences who sit there and laugh at him about it, he must feel tremendous remorse for giving up his photography.

Jon Cone
Piezography


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Dave <cowcreekroad@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> On May 20, 2010, at 9:46 PM, piezobw wrote:
> 
> >  I had to build a plastic coated room to contain the environment and  
> > ran a humidifier in conjunction with a dehumidifier.
> 
> 
> C'mon Jon - we all know that's an old Steven Wright line...  ;-)
> "For my birthday I got a humidifier and a dehumidifier. I put them in  
> the same room and let them fight it out."
> 
> 
> Dave
> http://www.davereichertphoto.com/
>

Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Clayton Price

Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same  
printer, and it seems to be working for me.

Our Epson 4880's were clogging almost every time they weren't used  
for two or three days. He recommended
covering the printer with plastic sheeting, tucking it in around the  
bottom. On top of the paper feed
cover (in the front) I put an old 5X7 darkroom tray, holding a sponge  
and about half filled with water.
We were recently away for about 20 days, and when I got back, the  
first nozzle check was perfect. No clogs
now, in several months.

On the other hand, right next to the 4880 is a 5 year old 2400, which  
I beta tested for Epson. It has never clogged,
even once, and I do not have a cover over it. Not only that, there  
have been multiple periods of a month or more
when the printer hasn't been used at all, and yet like a very good  
friend, it's always there and ready.

So this business of printing is a real crap shoot!

BTW, this is controversial, but I leave both printers on, all the  
time. Not sure if that helps or not.

Clay

  Clayton Price Photographer
  www.claytonpricephotographer.com
  clay@...

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Mark Savoia

Isn't it more about if the capping station seals correctly or not?  
Kind of a crap shoot. Keeping it clean sure does help. If it seals  
correctly it should not matter what the humidity is around it, the dry  
or moist air can not get at the head.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On May 21, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Clayton Price wrote:

> Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same
> printer, and it seems to be working for me.
>
> Our Epson 4880's were clogging almost every time they weren't used
> for two or three days. He recommended
> covering the printer with plastic sheeting, tucking it in around the
> bottom. On top of the paper feed
> cover (in the front) I put an old 5X7 darkroom tray, holding a sponge
> and about half filled with water.
> We were recently away for about 20 days, and when I got back, the
> first nozzle check was perfect. No clogs
> now, in several months.
>
> On the other hand, right next to the 4880 is a 5 year old 2400, which
> I beta tested for Epson. It has never clogged,
> even once, and I do not have a cover over it. Not only that, there
> have been multiple periods of a month or more
> when the printer hasn't been used at all, and yet like a very good
> friend, it's always there and ready.
>
> So this business of printing is a real crap shoot!
>
> BTW, this is controversial, but I leave both printers on, all the
> time. Not sure if that helps or not.
>
> Clay
>
>  Clayton Price Photographer
>  www.claytonpricephotographer.com
>  clay@...
>
> [rint/join
>    (Yahoo! ID required)
>
>
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Tina Manley

Everybody should just move to South Carolina ;-)  We never have a problem
with low humidity here.  Right now it's 87%.  My printers never, ever clog.

Tina

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Clayton Price <clay@...> wrote:

>
>
> Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same
> printer, and it seems to be working for me.
>
> Clay
>
> --
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

low humidity

2010-05-21 by rternbach

Clay,
I also prefer the low-tech approach whenever possible. My 4800 sat for six months wrapped, as you describe, with a plastic sheet. It did have the advantage of cart's filled with flush fluid however. Once I started it up and did a couple of nozzle checks it was ready for fresh inks. No need to go overboard with technology unless of course you absolutely feel the need to do so>

http://www.egc.com/prod_controlled_rooms.php

Rudy


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Clayton Price <clay@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same  
> printer, and it seems to be working for me.
> 
> Our Epson 4880's were clogging almost every time they weren't used  
> for two or three days. He recommended
> covering the printer with plastic sheeting, tucking it in around the  
> bottom. On top of the paper feed
> cover (in the front) I put an old 5X7 darkroom tray, holding a sponge  
> and about half filled with water.
> We were recently away for about 20 days, and when I got back, the  
> first nozzle check was perfect. No clogs
> now, in several months.
> 
> On the other hand, right next to the 4880 is a 5 year old 2400, which  
> I beta tested for Epson. It has never clogged,
> even once, and I do not have a cover over it. Not only that, there  
> have been multiple periods of a month or more
> when the printer hasn't been used at all, and yet like a very good  
> friend, it's always there and ready.
> 
> So this business of printing is a real crap shoot!
> 
> BTW, this is controversial, but I leave both printers on, all the  
> time. Not sure if that helps or not.
> 
> Clay
> 
>   Clayton Price Photographer
>   www.claytonpricephotographer.com
>   clay@...
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by mrjimbo

I don't think so Mark.. Even a brand new printer that sits for a few days plugs up.. Not to start a flame war here but it seems to be more about specific inks as in K3 also.. At least in my experience. When the humidity gets down around 12% or less you can't even tell your sweating as it evaporates into the air so quickly.. The pads under the print head dry out and in turn wick and moisture out of whatever it can in the print head I figure.. I sort of have a routine that works most of the time.. But if I miss a few days because I'm gone I'm in trouble.. I've never taken a print head apart but their must be ink on the back side of the nozzles to some degree I figure it just dries pretty much the same as if it were on paper. Your right to some degree however for sure.. If the capping stations aren't sealed well that just has to make it really worse.

jimbo
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Mark Savoia 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 7:16 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity


    
  Isn't it more about if the capping station seals correctly or not? 
  Kind of a crap shoot. Keeping it clean sure does help. If it seals 
  correctly it should not matter what the humidity is around it, the dry 
  or moist air can not get at the head.

  Mark
  http://www.stillrivereditions.com

  On May 21, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Clayton Price wrote:

  > Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same
  > printer, and it seems to be working for me.
  >
  > Our Epson 4880's were clogging almost every time they weren't used
  > for two or three days. He recommended
  > covering the printer with plastic sheeting, tucking it in around the
  > bottom. On top of the paper feed
  > cover (in the front) I put an old 5X7 darkroom tray, holding a sponge
  > and about half filled with water.
  > We were recently away for about 20 days, and when I got back, the
  > first nozzle check was perfect. No clogs
  > now, in several months.
  >
  > On the other hand, right next to the 4880 is a 5 year old 2400, which
  > I beta tested for Epson. It has never clogged,
  > even once, and I do not have a cover over it. Not only that, there
  > have been multiple periods of a month or more
  > when the printer hasn't been used at all, and yet like a very good
  > friend, it's always there and ready.
  >
  > So this business of printing is a real crap shoot!
  >
  > BTW, this is controversial, but I leave both printers on, all the
  > time. Not sure if that helps or not.
  >
  > Clay
  >
  > Clayton Price Photographer
  > www.claytonpricephotographer.com
  > clay@...
  >
  > [rint/join
  > (Yahoo! ID required)
  >
  >
  >



  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by slcphoto73

Hi, Gary. I live in Santa Fe at 7000 feet and desert and print with a 3800. Santa Fe is not as dry as Phoenix but in the winter with the heat on it rarely gets above 20% humidity. 

This last winter while we were on our winter driveabout the housesitters forgot to turn on/off the printer every week. We came back after 3 months and I ran a nozzle check and a print - to my great surprise A was OK! What a vast improvement over my previous 2400. So I think you are not just lucky - the printer is good.

  - susan

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Brown" <baffin@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> I print with a 3800 and really don't do anything different because of the low humidity. I keep the printer covered except when I'm printing and blow off the printer (with compressed air) before I print. Living in a desert environment, dust can be more of an issue. A few months a year, known as the "Monsoon Season" the humidity is higher, also after a rain storm. We average about 7" of rain a year and compared to what most people associate with monsoon, I'm not sure why they call it that. I print fairly often. I do occasional head cleanings, nothing really extraordinary.
> 
> I wish I could be more help. Maybe I'm just lucky.
> 
> Gary
> 
> baffin@...
> 
> http://wwwgaryallenbrownphoto.com
>

[Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by rternbach

Tina,
87% is less problematic than 10% but it may be too high for optimal printing. I think Jon wrote he prefers to print at 35% RH. 
Rudy

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tina Manley <images@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Everybody should just move to South Carolina ;-)  We never have a problem
> with low humidity here.  Right now it's 87%.  My printers never, ever clog.
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Clayton Price <clay@...> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Well, here's a low tech solution, learned from a friend with the same
> > printer, and it seems to be working for me.
> >
> > Clay
> >
> > --
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Bob Frost

> Isn't it more about if the capping station seals correctly or not?

I agree, but would say it depends if the capping station seals 'perfectly' 
or not. It may have sealed correctly in the right position, but if a hair, 
fibre, dust, bit of dried ink, etc come between the two sealing surfaces, 
you won't get a perfect seal. In addition, I would imagine that as the 
rubber seals age, they become less flexible and less likely to maintain a 
perfect seal.

I've left a R2400 for 6 months, and it only required one cleaning run to 
have all the nozzles firing correctly. Must have a good seal!

Bob F.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mark Savoia" <mark@...>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Bob Frost

> Everybody should just move to South Carolina ;-)  We never have a problem
> with low humidity here.  Right now it's 87%.  My printers never, ever 
> clog.

Nor do mine; but again it is 19 degrees and 77% humidity outside. Llyn 
Peninsula, N. Wales, UK. Sea all around!

bob F.

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Tina Manley" <images@...>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Bob Frost

> 87% is less problematic than 10% but it may be too high for optimal 
> printing.

I think Epson specify 20 - 80% without any condensation.

Bob F.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "rternbach" <RT@...>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: low humidity

2010-05-21 by Bob Frost

> I don't think so Mark.. Even a brand new printer that sits for a few days 
> plugs up.. Not to start a flame war here but it seems to be more about 
> specific inks as in K3 also.. At least in my experience. When the humidity 
> gets down around 12% or less you can't even tell your sweating as it 
> evaporates into the air so quickly.. The pads under the print head dry out 
> and in turn wick and moisture out of whatever it can in the print head I 
> figure..


If the capping station seals perfectly to the head, there is only one way 
out for the ink vapour and that is through the plastic tube from the capping 
station to the waste pads - via the pump. Not sure how much the ink solvent 
would penetrate the plastic tubing, but there is no other way out - is 
there?

I would expect that if you are printing on dusty, fibrous, arty papers, the 
head is going to get covered in the dust and fibres which will prevent a 
perfect seal, even if the head does get its bottom wiped frequently. I would 
bet it is much less of a problem if you print on Premium Glossy!

As I said in another post, my old R2400 (with Epson inks) can sit for 6 
months without use, and only need one cleaning cycle for a perfect nozzle 
check. My 3800 usually prints perfectly after a week or two without use. I 
rarely bother to do nozzle checks unless I'm doing an important print. But I 
do live in a humid area, don't print on matte papers very often, and don't 
use 3rdparty inks.

bob F.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "mrjimbo" <mrjimbo@...>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Controlling a Studio Environment-- was, "low humidity"

2010-05-21 by Dave

On May 21, 2010, at 6:40 AM, piezobw wrote:

> Did you ever stop to think that Steven Wright may not have been born  
> a comedian... He may have been driven mad by trying to perfect the  
> aquatint photogravure method...
>

I get the feeling he would be a brilliant photographer; somewhere  
along the lines of Elliot Erwitt.

Re: low humidity

2010-05-22 by Barrett Benton

Meanwhile, here in "temperate" New York City, I've been using an HP  
Photosmart Pro 8750 for close to five years, and in all that time,  
can recall having two clogs, one of which was due to installing a  
used cartridge someone handed me. Part of this might be explained by  
the use of dyes instead of pigs, but that doesn't explain the holy  
Hades I endured while using several dye-ink-based Epsons over the  
years. (And the Vivera dyes are a lot more stable.)

*One* likely explanation might lie in subtle bit of automata built  
into the 8750: if I haven't used it in over a week (on occasion, I've  
gone for upwards of a month without touching it), it will  
automatically fire up for about fifteen seconds and go though a quick  
self-test cycle. It does this rather quietly, so not only do you have  
to be near the thing when it switches on, but also have a keen ear.

It's about the least amount of babysitting I've had to give *any*  
printer. That's why I went to the trouble of sourcing a second,  
barely-touched 8750 to mothball as a spare.


- Barrett

Your experience of heavy paper on smaller 8.5", 13" and 17" printers

2010-05-26 by Phil

Have anyone tried any kind of very heavy paper, like Epson Somerset 
Velvet, and Epson Smooth Fine Art paper, about 500gsm, 36mil, on a 
smaller printer, like Epson R1800/R1900/R2400/R2880? Or even letter 
(8.5") sized printer?

I assume they are Ok for Epson 3800/3880/4000/4800/4880 17" printer and 
above.

Thanks for sharing your experience, successful or not.

- Phil

Re: Your experience of heavy paper on smaller 8.5", 13" and 17" printers

2010-05-26 by dlruckus

I've used the Somerset Velvet in uncoated and enhanced varieties  in both a 1200 and the old 3000 without problems.
You may have to help them get started but they worked.

Regards, 
Duane




--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Phil <panmedia@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Have anyone tried any kind of very heavy paper, like Epson Somerset 
> Velvet, and Epson Smooth Fine Art paper, about 500gsm, 36mil, on a 
> smaller printer, like Epson R1800/R1900/R2400/R2880? Or even letter 
> (8.5") sized printer?
> 
> I assume they are Ok for Epson 3800/3880/4000/4800/4880 17" printer and 
> above.
> 
> Thanks for sharing your experience, successful or not.
> 
> - Phil
>

Epson 2200 questions

2010-06-10 by Globe Trotteur

I am ready to buy an Epson 2200 from a friend to upgrade from my 220. Does anybody has instructions on how to pull the waste tube to have the ink drain outside the printer and not inside? I did it with my 220 and it was easy. I do not think the 2200 has a little trap door like the 220.

 

Now, i know that I can find CIS for the 2200 on the internet but would like to get riffillable cartridge instead. Does anybody make some for this printer?

 

Thanks for any advice.

Pierre
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

2200 Question

2010-06-13 by Globe Trotteur

So i just got a 2200 that has been sitting in a garage on its side for 1 year. I was able to do one test print before I ran out of magenta. I just ordered a few cartridges. This printer had very low usage. Am i wasting my $$ buying new cartridges or would i be able to have a clean test print? Right now, on the first head test, only 3 heads gave me a nozzle print.

Thanks.

Pierre

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] 2200 Question

2010-06-13 by John K Stacy

As with any inkjet printer, you may have to do several head cleanings (uses ink so have some on hand) before you get a good print.  On particularly difficult heads, you may need to purchase cleaning carts and run them thru a few times.  Sometimes it just takes patience (and ink) to revive them.

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Globe Trotteur 
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 3:01 PM
To: Digital Blackandwhite 
Subject: [Digital BW] 2200 Question


  

So i just got a 2200 that has been sitting in a garage on its side for 1 year. I was able to do one test print before I ran out of magenta. I just ordered a few cartridges. This printer had very low usage. Am i wasting my $$ buying new cartridges or would i be able to have a clean test print? Right now, on the first head test, only 3 heads gave me a nozzle print.

Thanks.

Pierre


__________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-13 by Paul

Globe Trotteur <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
>
> 
> So i just got a 2200 that has been sitting in a garage on its side for 1 year. I was able to do one test print before I ran out of magenta. I just ordered a few cartridges. This printer had very low usage. Am i wasting my $$ buying new cartridges or would i be able to have a clean test print? Right now, on the first head test, only 3 heads gave me a nozzle print.

I was given a 2200 some years ago that had been in a warehouse for a couple of years.  It took about a day for carts with Windex (a window cleaner with ammonia in it) in them to chew their way through the clogs.  So, I'd recommend getting empty carts and using some Windex.  Or, buy some cleaning carts.  I use the generic ink base described at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Inkset-list.html, with some Windex in it, as a cleaning fluid.  Epson's cleaning fluid used more glycol relative to glycerol.  You can accomplish this by using more Photo Flo, which is about 30% glycol.

Also, one of the main things I do short of the carts with windex or cleaning fluid is just to soak the parking pad in Windex and let the head sit in it over night.  Ammonia appears to dissolve the binder used in most inks.  If it's too strong, however, it apparently can damage the heads.

I'm told isopropyl alcohol will also dissolve the binder, but I've never used it for that purpose.

Good luck with the printer.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-15 by Un Globe Trotteur

Thanks Paul...Here's an update. The first time I did a nozzle check, I got 4 heads that gave me some lines with holes. I put some windex on a paper towel and ran the head over. I did put some windex too on the parking pad. Then I did a couple of purges. I let it rest all night. Now I am getting 5 out of 7 heads with perfect lines. The yellow still has holes but the cyan gives me nothing. What is strange is that the cyan was one of the head that printed the first day. How can it just stop? The weird thing is that when I print a 7 purge test pattern image, the cyan prints fine. 

I just ordered some more cartridges as a cleaning cycle takes 3% of ink,
Would it be a good idea if tomorrow I still not get anything with the cyan to inject some windex directly where the cartridge fits with a syringe?
Right now I ran the head again on top of a paper towel with windex and did a clean cycle. I will check tomorrow night.

Does it do anything to shake the cartridge?

Thanks for any advice. I am hopeful to have it working. It looks like a good printer.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Paul 
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 4:56 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Globe Trotteur <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
>
> 
> So i just got a 2200 that has been sitting in a garage on its side for 1 year. I was able to do one test print before I ran out of magenta. I just ordered a few cartridges. This printer had very low usage. Am i wasting my $$ buying new cartridges or would i be able to have a clean test print? Right now, on the first head test, only 3 heads gave me a nozzle print.

I was given a 2200 some years ago that had been in a warehouse for a couple of years. It took about a day for carts with Windex (a window cleaner with ammonia in it) in them to chew their way through the clogs. So, I'd recommend getting empty carts and using some Windex. Or, buy some cleaning carts. I use the generic ink base described at http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Inkset-list.html, with some Windex in it, as a cleaning fluid. Epson's cleaning fluid used more glycol relative to glycerol. You can accomplish this by using more Photo Flo, which is about 30% glycol.

Also, one of the main things I do short of the carts with windex or cleaning fluid is just to soak the parking pad in Windex and let the head sit in it over night. Ammonia appears to dissolve the binder used in most inks. If it's too strong, however, it apparently can damage the heads.

I'm told isopropyl alcohol will also dissolve the binder, but I've never used it for that purpose.

Good luck with the printer.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-16 by Paul

"Un Globe Trotteur" <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
>
>...
> Would it be a good idea if tomorrow I still not get anything with the cyan to inject some windex directly where the cartridge fits with a syringe?

I once saw an Epson repair person squirt cleaning fluid through a head that way.  I imagine too much pressure could damage a head.  However, I tried that with a head with quite a bit of pressure and it didn't hurt the head.  I suppose if you can get some Windex into the head it'll help break up the clumps of pigments, if that is the problem

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-17 by Un Globe Trotteur

Paul, thanks for the advice. The cartridges inside are dye, not pigment. There's nothing on the box that says pigment so I assume that they are epson dye. I got 3 unopened cartridges with the printer and an expiration date of 2007. So the cartridges inside may be 3 years old at least.
I did inject some windex with a syringe into the cyan and it cleared the head.
What I am confused is that I had to remove the adjacent cartridges to access the hole. Now where I used to get a perfect nozzle check, I do not anymore. Does that mean that air entered the system? How can I get a perfect nozzle check on a head one time and not the other?

Right now I am going to let it stand a few hours before I check it again. It is looking better than when I got the printer but it is not perfect.

Some companies sell cleaning liquid. Is that worth buying or doing the nozzle cleaning routine will fix it after a while?

Thanks for any advice.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Paul 
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:26 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
"Un Globe Trotteur" <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
>
>...
> Would it be a good idea if tomorrow I still not get anything with the cyan to inject some windex directly where the cartridge fits with a syringe?

I once saw an Epson repair person squirt cleaning fluid through a head that way. I imagine too much pressure could damage a head. However, I tried that with a head with quite a bit of pressure and it didn't hurt the head. I suppose if you can get some Windex into the head it'll help break up the clumps of pigments, if that is the problem

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-17 by njfranknj

Taking the carts out and replacing them is likely to cause some temporary air to get into the system but normal cleaning cycles should remove it with or without letting the printer stand for a few hours or a day.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that I was the first person to post info on the syringe cleaning method back in the late '90s and I have used it since on several different Epson printer models as well as the 2 2200s which I still use exclusively with a continuous inking system and MIS Pro pigment inks. Sometimes after injecting cleaning solution (I use isopropyl alcohol, but any of the others should be just as good) it helps really stubborn clogs to let the solvent sit for a while then reapply the syringe but gently, always gently!, pull the plunger back to create suction on the jet that's blocked. The one time I had a totally unresponsive clog, this method dislodged a clump of cyan from the head and it resumed working perfectly.

It also helps to clean the underside of the head occasionally, if you start to get streaks or blobs on prints, especially on the edges. The method there is to release the head from the parked position, raise it as if for thick paper, put a piece of folded paper towel moistened with cleaning solvent, or better yet, lint-free "baby wipes", into the trough below the head and then slide the head over the paper and lower it to the thin paper printing position. Let it sit that way for a few minutes and repeat as needed. It is *messy* and the ink can be permanent on fabric, so be careful. You can slide the head back and forth over the paper to clean more thoroughly. This procedure can wick the ink out of the head, so don't leave it for too long, a few minutes should do.

Good luck,

Frank

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-17 by Un Globe Trotteur

Thank you for the feedback. I just got some refillable cartridges so I can do more cleaning cycles. Right now, 6 out of 7 heads have perfect nozzle check. The cyan has and always had one small hole. It looks like cleaning cycle and inject windex in the head has not fix that. Could the head be bad or should I keep trying? Frustration...Frustration...
Thanks.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: njfranknj 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:58 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Taking the carts out and replacing them is likely to cause some temporary air to get into the system but normal cleaning cycles should remove it with or without letting the printer stand for a few hours or a day.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that I was the first person to post info on the syringe cleaning method back in the late '90s and I have used it since on several different Epson printer models as well as the 2 2200s which I still use exclusively with a continuous inking system and MIS Pro pigment inks. Sometimes after injecting cleaning solution (I use isopropyl alcohol, but any of the others should be just as good) it helps really stubborn clogs to let the solvent sit for a while then reapply the syringe but gently, always gently!, pull the plunger back to create suction on the jet that's blocked. The one time I had a totally unresponsive clog, this method dislodged a clump of cyan from the head and it resumed working perfectly.

It also helps to clean the underside of the head occasionally, if you start to get streaks or blobs on prints, especially on the edges. The method there is to release the head from the parked position, raise it as if for thick paper, put a piece of folded paper towel moistened with cleaning solvent, or better yet, lint-free "baby wipes", into the trough below the head and then slide the head over the paper and lower it to the thin paper printing position. Let it sit that way for a few minutes and repeat as needed. It is *messy* and the ink can be permanent on fabric, so be careful. You can slide the head back and forth over the paper to clean more thoroughly. This procedure can wick the ink out of the head, so don't leave it for too long, a few minutes should do.

Good luck,

Frank





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by John K Stacy

Keep trying, especially if you have cleaning carts...I've spent a week or more on a 1270 before I gor a "clean" nozzle check.

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Un Globe Trotteur 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:39 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Thank you for the feedback. I just got some refillable cartridges so I can do more cleaning cycles. Right now, 6 out of 7 heads have perfect nozzle check. The cyan has and always had one small hole. It looks like cleaning cycle and inject windex in the head has not fix that. Could the head be bad or should I keep trying? Frustration...Frustration...
Thanks.
Pierre

From: njfranknj 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:58 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Taking the carts out and replacing them is likely to cause some temporary air to get into the system but normal cleaning cycles should remove it with or without letting the printer stand for a few hours or a day.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that I was the first person to post info on the syringe cleaning method back in the late '90s and I have used it since on several different Epson printer models as well as the 2 2200s which I still use exclusively with a continuous inking system and MIS Pro pigment inks. Sometimes after injecting cleaning solution (I use isopropyl alcohol, but any of the others should be just as good) it helps really stubborn clogs to let the solvent sit for a while then reapply the syringe but gently, always gently!, pull the plunger back to create suction on the jet that's blocked. The one time I had a totally unresponsive clog, this method dislodged a clump of cyan from the head and it resumed working perfectly.

It also helps to clean the underside of the head occasionally, if you start to get streaks or blobs on prints, especially on the edges. The method there is to release the head from the parked position, raise it as if for thick paper, put a piece of folded paper towel moistened with cleaning solvent, or better yet, lint-free "baby wipes", into the trough below the head and then slide the head over the paper and lower it to the thin paper printing position. Let it sit that way for a few minutes and repeat as needed. It is *messy* and the ink can be permanent on fabric, so be careful. You can slide the head back and forth over the paper to clean more thoroughly. This procedure can wick the ink out of the head, so don't leave it for too long, a few minutes should do.

Good luck,

Frank

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by Un Globe Trotteur

Thanks I'll keep trying. No I do not have cleaning carts. I have refillable cart with dye ink. I will keep alternating between nozzle checks, cleaning cycle and resting period. Would a cleaning cart do better than squirting small amount of windex in the head?
Appreciate the advice.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: John K Stacy 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:27 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Keep trying, especially if you have cleaning carts...I've spent a week or more on a 1270 before I gor a "clean" nozzle check.

John

From: Un Globe Trotteur 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:39 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Thank you for the feedback. I just got some refillable cartridges so I can do more cleaning cycles. Right now, 6 out of 7 heads have perfect nozzle check. The cyan has and always had one small hole. It looks like cleaning cycle and inject windex in the head has not fix that. Could the head be bad or should I keep trying? Frustration...Frustration...
Thanks.
Pierre

From: njfranknj 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:58 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Taking the carts out and replacing them is likely to cause some temporary air to get into the system but normal cleaning cycles should remove it with or without letting the printer stand for a few hours or a day.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that I was the first person to post info on the syringe cleaning method back in the late '90s and I have used it since on several different Epson printer models as well as the 2 2200s which I still use exclusively with a continuous inking system and MIS Pro pigment inks. Sometimes after injecting cleaning solution (I use isopropyl alcohol, but any of the others should be just as good) it helps really stubborn clogs to let the solvent sit for a while then reapply the syringe but gently, always gently!, pull the plunger back to create suction on the jet that's blocked. The one time I had a totally unresponsive clog, this method dislodged a clump of cyan from the head and it resumed working perfectly.

It also helps to clean the underside of the head occasionally, if you start to get streaks or blobs on prints, especially on the edges. The method there is to release the head from the parked position, raise it as if for thick paper, put a piece of folded paper towel moistened with cleaning solvent, or better yet, lint-free "baby wipes", into the trough below the head and then slide the head over the paper and lower it to the thin paper printing position. Let it sit that way for a few minutes and repeat as needed. It is *messy* and the ink can be permanent on fabric, so be careful. You can slide the head back and forth over the paper to clean more thoroughly. This procedure can wick the ink out of the head, so don't leave it for too long, a few minutes should do.

Good luck,

Frank

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by Dave

Pierre -

Are you sure you've got dye ink? That would be highly unusual.
The 2200 as it comes from Epson, is a pigment printer.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Un Globe Trotteur wrote:

> Thanks I'll keep trying. No I do not have cleaning carts. I have  
> refillable cart with dye ink. I will keep alternating between nozzle  
> checks, cleaning cycle and resting period. Would a cleaning cart do  
> better than squirting small amount of windex in the head?
> Appreciate the advice.

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by Un Globe Trotteur

yep. I purchased refillable cart with dye. I use the printer to make digital negative so longevity is not an issue. and also is a brighter ink I think. it may be less prone to clog but right now, I still have a small hole that creates a thin line when I have magenta color in a print. I am going to do a nozzle cleaning and let it rest all night.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Dave 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 9:05 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Pierre -

Are you sure you've got dye ink? That would be highly unusual.
The 2200 as it comes from Epson, is a pigment printer.

On Jun 17, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Un Globe Trotteur wrote:

> Thanks I'll keep trying. No I do not have cleaning carts. I have 
> refillable cart with dye ink. I will keep alternating between nozzle 
> checks, cleaning cycle and resting period. Would a cleaning cart do 
> better than squirting small amount of windex in the head?
> Appreciate the advice.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by John K Stacy

Well, cleaning carts would be cheaper than ink, you might Google cleaning fluids and see what's recommended that works without damaging the heads, I've heard that alcohol works well...

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Un Globe Trotteur 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:45 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
Thanks I'll keep trying. No I do not have cleaning carts. I have refillable cart with dye ink. I will keep alternating between nozzle checks, cleaning cycle and resting period. Would a cleaning cart do better than squirting small amount of windex in the head?
Appreciate the advice.
Pierre

From: John K Stacy 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:27 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Keep trying, especially if you have cleaning carts...I've spent a week or more on a 1270 before I gor a "clean" nozzle check.

John

From: Un Globe Trotteur 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 5:39 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Thank you for the feedback. I just got some refillable cartridges so I can do more cleaning cycles. Right now, 6 out of 7 heads have perfect nozzle check. The cyan has and always had one small hole. It looks like cleaning cycle and inject windex in the head has not fix that. Could the head be bad or should I keep trying? Frustration...Frustration...
Thanks.
Pierre

From: njfranknj 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:58 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

Taking the carts out and replacing them is likely to cause some temporary air to get into the system but normal cleaning cycles should remove it with or without letting the printer stand for a few hours or a day.

By the way, I'm pretty sure that I was the first person to post info on the syringe cleaning method back in the late '90s and I have used it since on several different Epson printer models as well as the 2 2200s which I still use exclusively with a continuous inking system and MIS Pro pigment inks. Sometimes after injecting cleaning solution (I use isopropyl alcohol, but any of the others should be just as good) it helps really stubborn clogs to let the solvent sit for a while then reapply the syringe but gently, always gently!, pull the plunger back to create suction on the jet that's blocked. The one time I had a totally unresponsive clog, this method dislodged a clump of cyan from the head and it resumed working perfectly.

It also helps to clean the underside of the head occasionally, if you start to get streaks or blobs on prints, especially on the edges. The method there is to release the head from the parked position, raise it as if for thick paper, put a piece of folded paper towel moistened with cleaning solvent, or better yet, lint-free "baby wipes", into the trough below the head and then slide the head over the paper and lower it to the thin paper printing position. Let it sit that way for a few minutes and repeat as needed. It is *messy* and the ink can be permanent on fabric, so be careful. You can slide the head back and forth over the paper to clean more thoroughly. This procedure can wick the ink out of the head, so don't leave it for too long, a few minutes should do.

Good luck,

Frank

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by dlruckus

John,Paul and Frank have all been correct in their recommendations.
I've also learned that you can use a 50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O in a syringe to gently clear the heads. The mixture will warm up as you make it and, if you allow it to set in the head for a few minutes, it will remove virtually any of the normal inks. If that doesn't do it you probably have a physical obstruction such as paper fibers blocking the nozzle.

Regards
Duane
 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John K Stacy" <John_K_Stacy@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Well, cleaning carts would be cheaper than ink, you might Google cleaning fluids and see what's recommended that works without damaging the heads, I've heard that alcohol works well...
> 
> John
>

Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-18 by John K Stacy

A different question:

If you store your printer unused for some period of time, say a few days/weeks, is it better to leave the power on, or turn the printer off??

John





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-18 by Tom Maugham

By store it do you mean packed in a box and put away? What is 'some period
of time'? I would say that it depends very much upon the printer. What does
the manufacturer say?

 

I have two printers in storage, that is packed in boxes and in a closet.
Both are turned off, have nearly full carts in them with the carriage taped
in place over the nozzle cap as it was when received from the factory. One
of them has been in storage for about a year and the other about 3 months.
The one I am using now was similarly stored for about a year and started
right up with only a couple of head cleanings necessary.

 

HTH,

tom

A different question:

If you store your printer unused for some period of time, say a few
days/weeks, is it better to leave the power on, or turn the printer off??

John






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-18 by Mark Savoia

I think this has been debated, some say yes some say no. I am not sure  
what the printer does when left on, it seems to go into standby, doing  
absolutely nothing, and I assume not delivering any voltage to the  
head and even if it did, so what. If the capping station seals the  
head well and it can not dry out then it has done its job, totally a  
mechanical thing.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 18, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Tom Maugham wrote:

> tom
>
> A different question:
>
> If you store your printer unused for some period of time, say a few
> days/weeks, is it better to leave the power on, or turn the printer  
> off??
>
> John

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by bwinkjet

That means 100 proof vodka would work as well. 
Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" <dlruckus@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> John,Paul and Frank have all been correct in their recommendations.
> I've also learned that you can use a 50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O in a syringe to gently clear the heads. The mixture will warm up as you make it and, if you allow it to set in the head for a few minutes, it will remove virtually any of the normal inks. If that doesn't do it you probably have a physical obstruction such as paper fibers blocking the nozzle.
> 
> Regards
> Duane
>  
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John K Stacy" <John_K_Stacy@> wrote:
> >
> > Well, cleaning carts would be cheaper than ink, you might Google cleaning fluids and see what's recommended that works without damaging the heads, I've heard that alcohol works well...
> > 
> > John
> >
>

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-18 by John K Stacy

AND be more enjoyable to work with!!! 

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: bwinkjet 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:51 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
That means 100 proof vodka would work as well. 
Paul

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "dlruckus" <dlruckus@...> wrote:
>
> John,Paul and Frank have all been correct in their recommendations.
> I've also learned that you can use a 50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O in a syringe to gently clear the heads. The mixture will warm up as you make it and, if you allow it to set in the head for a few minutes, it will remove virtually any of the normal inks. If that doesn't do it you probably have a physical obstruction such as paper fibers blocking the nozzle.
> 
> Regards
> Duane
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John K Stacy" <John_K_Stacy@> wrote:
> >
> > Well, cleaning carts would be cheaper than ink, you might Google cleaning fluids and see what's recommended that works without damaging the heads, I've heard that alcohol works well...
> > 
> > John
> >
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by CorrPro96@aol.com

>If you store your printer unused for some period of time, say a few  
days/weeks, is it better to leave the power on, or turn the printer  off??

John

You haven't mentioned which printer. It makes a big difference.
 
Rich
 
_www.rmassiephotography.com_ (http://www.rmassiephotography.com) 
 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by John K Stacy

That's interesting!!  I have 3 Epsons:  1100, 1400 and an older 2000P

Do different printers, or brands handle power on/off differently??

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: CorrPro96@... 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:03 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??


  
>If you store your printer unused for some period of time, say a few 
days/weeks, is it better to leave the power on, or turn the printer off??

John

You haven't mentioned which printer. It makes a big difference.

Rich

_www.rmassiephotography.com_ (http://www.rmassiephotography.com) 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by Dave

Yes. My HP 9180 requires that the power be on, 24/7. It runs a short  
head check and maintenance routine daily.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:27 PM, John K Stacy wrote:

> That's interesting!!  I have 3 Epsons:  1100, 1400 and an older 2000P
>
> Do different printers, or brands handle power on/off differently??
>
> John

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by John K Stacy

Interesting, I have an HP 6200 and it goes thru some sort of cycle every now and then, but the Epson's don't.

I leave everything on anyway, so....

John
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Dave 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:46 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??


  
Yes. My HP 9180 requires that the power be on, 24/7. It runs a short 
head check and maintenance routine daily.

On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:27 PM, John K Stacy wrote:

> That's interesting!! I have 3 Epsons: 1100, 1400 and an older 2000P
>
> Do different printers, or brands handle power on/off differently??
>
> John



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by Un Globe Trotteur

I read that it is not wise to leave Epson printers on as the head may heat up and create issues. I remember reading that a few years back. It could be wrong. Does the parking pad stick to the head when it's on or is there a gap in between.
Pierre


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Printer ON/OFF??

2010-06-19 by CorrPro96@aol.com

Decidedly.
Canon and Hp wide format printers should be left on. Epson wides are best  
turned off if they are going to lay up for more than a few days, but they 
should  have the printhead in the 'parked' position before power is cut off. 
Desktop  users should consult the manual.
 
Rich
 
_www.rmassiephotography.com_ (http://www.rmassiephotography.com) 
 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-20 by Un Globe Trotteur

I tried a few things but I still have a little hole when I do a nozzle check. I am ready to buy the I-remove kit from ink republic. They have one for pigment. I wonder if I am wasting my money. Duane suggested that I may have paper fibers blocking. Could that be.
On the other hand, when I do a print in 2880 on glossy paper, it prints fine. No small hair line. I guess the head passes a few times in the same spot and cover the small blank line.
So, should I be patient and keep printing ...hoping that the dye ink will eventually unclog the pigment or the fiber?
Should I try the I-remove kit from ink republic?
Should I empty my refillable magenta cartridge and fill it with Windex and run nozzle checks?
Should I give up?
Would the  50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O do a better job than Windex for pigment ink?

Thanks for any input. I really would like to have this printer working. It looks like a very good printer.
Pierre
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: dlruckus 
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 3:18 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question


  
John,Paul and Frank have all been correct in their recommendations.
I've also learned that you can use a 50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O in a syringe to gently clear the heads. The mixture will warm up as you make it and, if you allow it to set in the head for a few minutes, it will remove virtually any of the normal inks. If that doesn't do it you probably have a physical obstruction such as paper fibers blocking the nozzle.

Regards
Duane


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "John K Stacy" <John_K_Stacy@...> wrote:
>
> Well, cleaning carts would be cheaper than ink, you might Google cleaning fluids and see what's recommended that works without damaging the heads, I've heard that alcohol works well...
> 
> John
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-21 by dlruckus

I can only say that I have used Windex W/ammonia, 10%clear ammonia, a mixture of ethyl alc and propelene glycol, as well as the 50:50 denatured alc/H20. All have worked, dependent on the severity of the clog and the time left in the head. The last mix(denatured ethyl/H2O) removed traces of inks even after the others came through clear.
It was the final solution to clearing a totally clogged set of EP7500 heads that had been left for dead as unusable and had been setting open to the air for many months before I acquired the machine. It's also the only thing that I have ever used that completely removed all color from the long tubing between the cart station and heads on the large format machines I have.It does not seem to have caused any problems with the heads and they are now working very well.

Having said that, I wouldn't recommend using a syringe on the heads with any of these mixtures except as a last resort. One could use any of the above mixtures in an old cartridge, even one with ink residues in it, and let the full cart set awhile in the machine and run a few cleaning cycles over a period of time etc. Only if nothing else worked and there was nothing to lose would I force fluid through with a syringe.

If I had to give an opinion of effectiveness for all these my personal ranking would be consistent with the order I listed above.

Hope this helps and is useful.
Regards,
Duane



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Un Globe Trotteur" <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>

> Would the  50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled H2O do a better job than Windex for pigment ink?
> 
> Thanks for any input. I really would like to have this printer working. It looks like a very good printer.
> Pierre
>

Waste ink tube diameter

2010-06-22 by Globe Trotteur

Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.

Thanks.

Pierre

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2010-06-22 by Mark Savoia

If it is anything like all the other waste tubes in other Epson  
printers, using standard fish tank air line fits over the OD of that  
tube.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:

>
> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in  
> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get  
> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Pierre
>

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2010-06-22 by Un Globe Trotteur

Thanks Mark. I really wanted to use a barbed fitting that would slide into the end of both tubes. That is the reason, I wanted to know the inside diameter of the ink tube.
Appreciate your input...May use your solution if I cannot find out.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Mark Savoia 
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:57 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter


  
If it is anything like all the other waste tubes in other Epson 
printers, using standard fish tank air line fits over the OD of that 
tube.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com

On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:

>
> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in 
> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get 
> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Pierre
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2010-06-23 by C D Tobie

On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:

> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in  
> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get  
> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.

A longer tube of the same diameter could make for increased back  
pressure. I'd suggest getting a larger tube, and inserting the  
existing tube inside it, taping the joint, and then running the larger  
tube out.

C. David Tobie
Global Product Technology Manager
Digital Imaging & Home Theater
CDTobie@...


  ----------



Datacolor
www.datacolor.com/Spyder3





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2010-06-23 by Ernst Dinkla

C D Tobie schreef:
> On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:
> 
>> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in  
>> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get  
>> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.
> 
> A longer tube of the same diameter could make for increased back  
> pressure. I'd suggest getting a larger tube, and inserting the  
> existing tube inside it, taping the joint, and then running the larger  
> tube out.
> 
> C. David Tobie

And make sure that there will be no siphon effect that pulls out all the 
carts inks in one night.

-- 
Met vriendelijke groeten,   Ernst

Try: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Wide_Inkjet_Printers/

|      Dinkla Grafische Techniek      |
|         www.pigment-print.com        |
|                 ( unvollendet )                 |

RE: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-24 by Tom Mallonee

The chemistry sounds great to me, too. My carpet guy uses a foaming alcohol
mix to remove my many ink boo-boos. I couldn't find the post quickly, but I
believe someone mentioned using paper or paper towel soaked in Windex and
then dragging the head over it. I have ruined two 7000 heads and one 7800
head by doing this. In all cases, the same one or two nozzles would simply
never fire, even after trying every other method for a couple weeks,  and I
had to replace the heads. I'm pretty certain that I jammed paper towel
fibers or something into a couple of nozzles. Whenever I've been compelled
to do it, I do it gently with a lint-less PecPad. I would consider this a
last resort as I do the syringe. In more than one case, the little hose from
the syringe came loose and I sprayed the head circuit board, once blowing up
the head circuit board, and another time blowing the head and the machine's
main board. Over the years I've blown up at least 5 main boards and other
expensive components by being a bit too aggressive and curious. I like
blowing things up, but after a while one must grow up. Sigh.
 
Tom
 
 
  
I can only say that I have used Windex W/ammonia, 10%clear ammonia, a
mixture of ethyl alc and propelene glycol, as well as the 50:50 denatured
alc/H20. All have worked, dependent on the severity of the clog and the time
left in the head. The last mix(denatured ethyl/H2O) removed traces of inks
even after the others came through clear.
It was the final solution to clearing a totally clogged set of EP7500 heads
that had been left for dead as unusable and had been setting open to the air
for many months before I acquired the machine. It's also the only thing that
I have ever used that completely removed all color from the long tubing
between the cart station and heads on the large format machines I have.It
does not seem to have caused any problems with the heads and they are now
working very well.

Having said that, I wouldn't recommend using a syringe on the heads with any
of these mixtures except as a last resort. One could use any of the above
mixtures in an old cartridge, even one with ink residues in it, and let the
full cart set awhile in the machine and run a few cleaning cycles over a
period of time etc. Only if nothing else worked and there was nothing to
lose would I force fluid through with a syringe.

If I had to give an opinion of effectiveness for all these my personal
ranking would be consistent with the order I listed above.

Hope this helps and is useful.
Regards,
Duane

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> , "Un Globe
Trotteur" <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
>

> Would the 50:50 mix of straight denatured alcohol(ie:ethyl) with distilled
H2O do a better job than Windex for pigment ink?
> 
> Thanks for any input. I really would like to have this printer working. It
looks like a very good printer.
> Pierre
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-24 by dlruckus

Yes. I had similar experiences with an old EP1200. It had a single nozzle I could never clear after using paper towel in that way. I finally removed the head from the machine, put a plungerless syringe full of flushing fluid on that chamber and applied a very strong vacuum to the nozzle side. That cleared it and after replacing it in the machine I got all nozzles firing. Unfortunately,I must not have gotten the ribbon cable securely back into the head because about half way through the first good print the machine crashed. Yep.....You got it, the main board blew. I replaced it and the head with components from an old EP750 I came across and it now works well. I still have the board and head and I may sometime repair the board and put it and the head into the old 750 to check them both.

I'm never dismayed by failed experiments but I do, at times, regret the time lost that might have been used more productively.

Regards,
Duane


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Mallonee" <tom@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
>  
> The chemistry sounds great to me, too. My carpet guy uses a foaming alcohol
> mix to remove my many ink boo-boos. I couldn't find the post quickly, but I
> believe someone mentioned using paper or paper towel soaked in Windex and
> then dragging the head over it. I have ruined two 7000 heads and one 7800
> head by doing this. In all cases, the same one or two nozzles would simply
> never fire, even after trying every other method for a couple weeks,  and I
> had to replace the heads. I'm pretty certain that I jammed paper towel
> fibers or something into a couple of nozzles. Whenever I've been compelled
> to do it, I do it gently with a lint-less PecPad. I would consider this a
> last resort as I do the syringe. In more than one case, the little hose from
> the syringe came loose and I sprayed the head circuit board, once blowing up
> the head circuit board, and another time blowing the head and the machine's
> main board. Over the years I've blown up at least 5 main boards and other
> expensive components by being a bit too aggressive and curious. I like
> blowing things up, but after a while one must grow up. Sigh.
>  
> Tom
>

RE: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2010-06-24 by Globe Trotteur

Thanks guys..I am waiting to get some pigment cleaning fluid. I have stopped messing with the windex and inserting it directly into the head. I do put a paper towel under to catch all the spill. So far, it looks like nothing has been damaged so I am stopping to mess with it. I do not think the heads in a 2200 are removable. Anyway, not sure i'll be good enough to remove them.

Right now, it's only a small hole (1 bar) in the nozzle test. It will only show a thin white line when i print high speed on regular paper. If i use 2880dpi and photo paper, then the line does not show up.

Maybe by using the printer a lot, after a while, the dried ink will start melting !!! it also could be some hardware issues but I doubt it. I found out that the printer has been sitting on its side for 3 years in a garage...

I like the printer a lot..

Pierre
 


To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@...m
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: dlruckus@...
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 14:04:37 +0000
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

  



Yes. I had similar experiences with an old EP1200. It had a single nozzle I could never clear after using paper towel in that way. I finally removed the head from the machine, put a plungerless syringe full of flushing fluid on that chamber and applied a very strong vacuum to the nozzle side. That cleared it and after replacing it in the machine I got all nozzles firing. Unfortunately,I must not have gotten the ribbon cable securely back into the head because about half way through the first good print the machine crashed. Yep.....You got it, the main board blew. I replaced it and the head with components from an old EP750 I came across and it now works well. I still have the board and head and I may sometime repair the board and put it and the head into the old 750 to check them both.

I'm never dismayed by failed experiments but I do, at times, regret the time lost that might have been used more productively.

Regards,
Duane

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Mallonee" <tom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> The chemistry sounds great to me, too. My carpet guy uses a foaming alcohol
> mix to remove my many ink boo-boos. I couldn't find the post quickly, but I
> believe someone mentioned using paper or paper towel soaked in Windex and
> then dragging the head over it. I have ruined two 7000 heads and one 7800
> head by doing this. In all cases, the same one or two nozzles would simply
> never fire, even after trying every other method for a couple weeks, and I
> had to replace the heads. I'm pretty certain that I jammed paper towel
> fibers or something into a couple of nozzles. Whenever I've been compelled
> to do it, I do it gently with a lint-less PecPad. I would consider this a
> last resort as I do the syringe. In more than one case, the little hose from
> the syringe came loose and I sprayed the head circuit board, once blowing up
> the head circuit board, and another time blowing the head and the machine's
> main board. Over the years I've blown up at least 5 main boards and other
> expensive components by being a bit too aggressive and curious. I like
> blowing things up, but after a while one must grow up. Sigh.
> 
> Tom
> 




 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail. 
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Epson R220 + CIS for sale

2010-07-14 by Globe Trotteur

Now that I have a 2200, i am not going to use my 220 anymore.

It is a little bit more than 3 years old. It has the waste ink tube pulled out so the pad has always been clean. No ink ever dropped inside the printer.

It comes with a CIS. Look at the image for my setup.

http://www.pierreoliviertavernier.com/podnc/220.jpg

 

The cartridges still have dye ink inside. The bottle have been emptied for transport. I have flushed the heads with some unclog cleaning solution to avoid the ink to dry because there are no cartridges installed. I still have the orginal cartridge that came with the printer. There were used one time for priming. They have been stored in a ziplock bag. Do not know if i should re install them for transport. I am also including them.

I have 6 empty syringe, the CD for the CIS and the mounting clips.


It is still in its original box with the CD plastic thingy to write on CD.

Asking $50 + s/h...email off list unglobetrotteur at hotmail dot com

 

Pierre
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2012-02-28 by SGK

I also live in an area of low humidity (New England in winter) and sufferred a clogged yellow nozzle. Cleaning cycles didnt help. Cleaning solution from inksupply.com did not help. I ran the print head over some paper towels with windex/water solution (1:1) but i was sloppy. The paper towels bunched up and it was hard getting them out from under the "paper jam". Now I went from a clogged yellow nozzle (with about half the jets missing) to an absolutely blank nozzle check print out. NOTHING SHOWS! 

I turned the printer off, disconnected usb, reattached power but left usb disconnected. I tried printing a nozzle check the 'hardware way' by holding the button with the 'page icon' and turning the printer on. Whereas before i would get an almost complete nozzle check pattern, now i get an absolutely blank page.

Is it possible to damage the print head from a paper jam? Obviously, something is dreadfully wrong. Did I clog all the nozzles with paper towel shreds? I removed the cartridges and the nipples all flush easily with cleaning solution from ink supply. No mechanical blockage. Still no nozzle check pattern even after several cleaning cycles. I really goofed. Is there anything to do to save this printer before throwing it out?

[Digital BW] Re: 2200 Question

2012-02-29 by Paul

"SGK" <topjetboy@...> wrote:
>
> 
> ... I ran the print head over some paper towels with windex/water solution (1:1) but i was sloppy. The paper towels bunched up ...


I use cloth "bias tape"  (I think it's called).  It's readily available at places that sell sewing supplies, including Walmart.  Luckily it's been a long time since I had to do this to a printer.  You might get some and see if it might remove possible paper stuck under the head.

Good luck with the printer.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Printer Resolution question

2012-03-02 by Globe Trotteur

I assume not everybody is using Epson printers in this forum.360 ppi is the preferred resolution for Epson. What about HP or Canon? is it 300 ppi? Thanks for the feedback.Pierre







   		 	   		  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

For harry Lockwood-Printer Resolution

2012-03-07 by Globe Trotteur

harry, I have been trying to reply to your message you sent me but your address keeps bouncing.The message you sent about printer resolution was sent to me and not to the board. That is why it never showed up. I am copying the message you sent me below.Thanks. Well, Pierre, I believe you're opening a can of worms.  But let's go fishing!
What I "know" is what I've gleaned from multiple sources, some reliable, others less so.  And all my remarks are based upon Epson printers but can easily be transcribed to other brands.
Firstly, the native resolution of  (all?) Epson printers is 1440 dpi, not 360 dpi.  The choice of printing resolution then depends upon the final print size and the question of resampling, up or down, and as we'll see, viewing distance.
It is recommended, for instance, that the chosen resolution be an integer divisor of the native resolution that results in a rational fraction.  That is: 1440/2 (720); 1440/3 (480); 1440/4 (360); 1440/5 (288); 1440/6 (240); 1440/8 (180), etc.  Note that 1440/7 = 205.57, and is, therefore, not recommended.  The rationale seems to be that these choices will, as a first step, avoid resampling by an unknown algorithm in the Epson driver.
Furthermore, the conventional wisdom is that one should choose one of the above resolutions that avoids up-sampling in favor of down-sampling for the given print size.
For instance, suppose one has a scan of a 35mm negative at 4000 ppi (not dpi!) for a pixel count of ~5670 in the long dimension, and the intention is to make an 18"x12" print.  Then 5670/18 = 315 dpi (approximately).  So, printing at a resolution of 360 dpi would require up-sampling, and the conventional wisdom cited above would suggest, instead, printing at 288 dpi.
I have personally done this test, and I was able to see a small, but real, difference in quality between 360 dpi and 288 dpi for such a print.  However this difference was visible when I viewed the print a from a distance of a few inches.  From a normal viewing distance I would not have been able to see what I saw up close.  So, viewing distance is a vital ingredient in the mix as well.
The print driver subtracts pixels in down-sampling and adds pixels in up-sampling.  How the Epson algorithm accomplishes this is not in the public domain.  But I'm aware of third-party software that purports to use algorithms that optimizes the processes.  This would seem to support the contention that re-sampling is an issue not to be ignored.
There, that is the extent of my knowledge and practice.  I'm hoping that the true experts on this forum will set the record straight.
Harry
 









   		 	   		  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2012-03-08 by sethrus

Not only that, but using a barb fitting to splice them could create the same flow restriction or allow a clog.  A little silicon around the "tubing over tubing" should seal it.

AS to siphoning ink, I cannot see where that would happen if it is not happening now.

One thought though: make sure your receptacle is vented.  This is a gravity flow system--not a pump.

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <edinkla@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> C D Tobie schreef:
> > On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:
> > 
> >> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in  
> >> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get  
> >> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.
> > 
> > A longer tube of the same diameter could make for increased back  
> > pressure. I'd suggest getting a larger tube, and inserting the  
> > existing tube inside it, taping the joint, and then running the larger  
> > tube out.
> > 
> > C. David Tobie
>

Re: 2200 Question--update

2012-03-08 by sethrus

Having just gone through similar issues witth a 2400, I found a solution. My LLK just would not check.  Power on and nozzle cleanings wouldn't clear.  A WIndex (Ammonia--NOT vinegar!!) filled cart was used twice also.
Finally, using SSC, Power Clean didn't solve it. I went to the "Initial Charge" setting (a LOT of ink though) and the next nozzle check was perfect.

Seth

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Globe Trotteur <unglobetrotteur@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> 
> Thanks guys..I am waiting to get some pigment cleaning fluid. I have stopped messing with the windex and inserting it directly into the head. I do put a paper towel under to catch all the spill. So far, it looks like nothing has been damaged so I am stopping to mess with it. I do not think the heads in a 2200 are removable. Anyway, not sure i'll be good enough to remove them.
> 
> Right now, it's only a small hole (1 bar) in the nozzle test. It will only show a thin white line when i print high speed on regular paper. If i use 2880dpi and photo paper, then the line does not show up.
> 
> Maybe by using the printer a lot, after a while, the dried ink will start melting !!! it also could be some hardware issues but I doubt it. I found out that the printer has been sitting on its side for 3 years in a garage...

RE: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2012-03-08 by Globe Trotteur

For my 2200, i bought a kit from octojet.co.uk. I highly recommend it. Very professional design. It came with a plastic fitting to go from the printer to the waste tank.I have been using it for more than a year now and it works flawessly.Pierre
 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: seth@...
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:08:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter


















 



  


    
      
      
      Not only that, but using a barb fitting to splice them could create the same flow restriction or allow a clog.  A little silicon around the "tubing over tubing" should seal it.



AS to siphoning ink, I cannot see where that would happen if it is not happening now.



One thought though: make sure your receptacle is vented.  This is a gravity flow system--not a pump.



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Ernst Dinkla <edinkla@...> wrote:

>

> C D Tobie schreef:

> > On Jun 22, 2010, at 4:48 PM, Globe Trotteur wrote:

> > 

> >> Does anyone know what is the diameter size of the waste ink tube in  

> >> a 2200? I am trying to see if i can go to my hardware store and get  

> >> a coupling device to extend it and re route it outside the printer.

> > 

> > A longer tube of the same diameter could make for increased back  

> > pressure. I'd suggest getting a larger tube, and inserting the  

> > existing tube inside it, taping the joint, and then running the larger  

> > tube out.

> > 

> > C. David Tobie

> 





    
     

    
    






   		 	   		  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2012-03-08 by Mark Savoia

Link don't work.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com

On Mar 8, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Globe Trotteur wrote:

>  i bought a kit from octojet.co.uk. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter

2012-03-08 by Globe Trotteur

Sorry..www.octoink.co.uk Pierre
 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: mark@...
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:37:58 -0500
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Waste ink tube diameter


















 



  


    
      
      
      Link don't work.



Mark

http://www.stillrivereditions.com



On Mar 8, 2012, at 8:33 AM, Globe Trotteur wrote:



>  i bought a kit from octojet.co.uk. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





    
     

    
    






   		 	   		  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.