Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!

Jerry

Imagine the cost!



Roger L Sopher wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> I found this on Tom's hardware Guide...
> 
> Looks like Canon is going to release the camera back many have been waiting for - an 11.1 mp full frame digital.
> 
> http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> 
> Roger
> 
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
>   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
>   If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
>   Please follow these basic guidelines:
>   - Include your full name with your message.
>   - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>   - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
>   - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
>   - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
>   - Complete your Yahoo profile.
>   - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Anyone see the ad for the new epson 965 printer?  It has 5760x720 DPI
resolution.  Sounds like hype in a $350 printer!

Jerry

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they can correct
the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in resolution vs
sharpness is...

;-)
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
>
> Jerry
>
> >
> > http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> >
> > Roger

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor? 
What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
still can't read that article.

Jerry


Austin Franklin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they can correct
> the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in resolution vs
> sharpness is...
> 
> ;-)
> 
> >  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > >
> > > http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> > >
> > > Roger
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

Yes, Jerry, of course I can read it...from 18-20 inches away ;-)  I have a
Hitachi 801HR, it's a 21" and it's set for 1600 x 1200.

Austin
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> still can't read that article.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> > A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they
> can correct
> > the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in
> resolution vs
> > sharpness is...
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > >  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > >
> > > > http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> > > >
> > > > Roger
>

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Truman Prevatt

For what it is worth, I had no trouble reading it. A bit small but very 
readable.  I'm using a Trinitron (18 inch across the diagonal) and 
Netscape 7.

Truman

Jerry Olson wrote:

> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> still can't read that article.
>
> Jerry
>
>
> Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> > A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they can 
> correct
> > the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in 
> resolution vs
> > sharpness is...
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > >  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > >
> > > > http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> > > >
> > > > Roger
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
> to keep them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> "flames."
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=233351.2287381.3722242.2225242/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1212975/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/grp/300_mapG/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl> 
>
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
> and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
> to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
> this same page.
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
> keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Andrew Biggs

Also looks good over here. I am running a Sony G520P 21" at 1600x1200,
and a Sony 17SE1 17" as my palette monitor. All is good over here,
although the text is pretty small.
Show quoted textHide quoted text
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@...] 
	Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 11:44 AM
	To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
	Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS
	
	
	
	Yes, Jerry, of course I can read it...from 18-20 inches away ;-)
I have a
	Hitachi 801HR, it's a 21" and it's set for 1600 x 1200.
	
	Austin
	
	> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your
monitor?
	> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.
My eyes are
	> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.
But I
	> still can't read that article.
	>
	> Jerry
	>
	>
	> Austin Franklin wrote:
	> >
	> > A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if
they
	> can correct
	> > the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference
in
	> resolution vs
	> > sharpness is...
	> >
	> > ;-)
	> >
	> > >  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1
point type!
	> > >
	> > > Jerry
	> > >
	> > > >
	> > > >
http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
	> > > >
	> > > > Roger
	>
	
	
	
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor	
ADVERTISEMENT
 
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=233351.2287381.3722242.2225242/D=egroupweb/S=1705
019182:HM/A=1212975/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/grp/300_mapG/g2
2lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl> 	
 
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=233351.2287381.3722242.2225242/D=egrou
pmail/S=:HM/A=1212975/rand=905220947> 	

	Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is
at:
	
	http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
	
	If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting
this same page.
	
	Please follow these basic guidelines:
	- Include your full name with your message.
	- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
	- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
messages to keep them short.
	- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the
subject header.
	- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
	- Complete your Yahoo profile.
	- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the
various resources on the homepage. 
	
	
	
	
	Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . 
	



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Roger L Sopher

It was a squeeze but was readable with my "computer glasses." 

Roger
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Jerry Olson [mailto:jerryolson@...]
  Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:47 AM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS


  Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!

  Jerry

  Imagine the cost!



        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       

  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Forgive me Austin, But I feel you spin fables. I have a 22 inch monitor 
set for 600x800 and it is totally
illegible. It's a very sharp monitor!

Jerry

Austin Franklin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Yes, Jerry, of course I can read it...from 18-20 inches away ;-)  I have a
> Hitachi 801HR, it's a 21" and it's set for 1600 x 1200.
> 
> Austin
> 
> 
>>Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
>>What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
>>excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
>>still can't read that article.
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>
>>Austin Franklin wrote:
>>
>>>A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they
>>
>>can correct
>>
>>>the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in
>>
>>resolution vs
>>
>>>sharpness is...
>>>
>>>;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
>>>>
>>>>Jerry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>Roger
>>>>
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

No, Jerry, I spin you no fables.  Many others have said they also had no
problems reading it...in fact, no one else said they couldn't read it.  I
think your vision might simply be degraded.

If your monitor is set to 800x600, and it's 22", you really should have your
eyes checked...or perhaps your monitor...I know you believe it's sharp, but
if you can't read that at 800x600, it's either your eyes or your monitor
that is causing the problem.

Either that, or you're simply pulling our collective legs ;-)

Regards,

Austin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry Olson [mailto:jerryolson@...]
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 3:04 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS
>
>
> Forgive me Austin, But I feel you spin fables. I have a 22 inch monitor
> set for 600x800 and it is totally
> illegible. It's a very sharp monitor!
>
> Jerry
>
> Austin Franklin wrote:
> > Yes, Jerry, of course I can read it...from 18-20 inches away
> ;-)  I have a
> > Hitachi 801HR, it's a 21" and it's set for 1600 x 1200.
> >
> > Austin
> >
> >
> >>Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> >>What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> >>excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> >>still can't read that article.
> >>
> >>Jerry
> >>
> >>
> >>Austin Franklin wrote:
> >>
> >>>A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they
> >>
> >>can correct
> >>
> >>>the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in
> >>
> >>resolution vs
> >>
> >>>sharpness is...
> >>>
> >>>;-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
> >>>>
> >>>>Jerry
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Roger
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks,
> Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> >
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by
> visiting this same page.
> >
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - Include your full name with your message.
> > - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier
> messages to keep them short.
> > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the
> subject header.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
> &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> > - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and
> the various resources on the homepage.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

Please follow these basic guidelines:
- Include your full name with your message.
- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
- Complete your Yahoo profile.
- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Fables! Fabrications! Veracity Challenged! :) .  Nobody has that great 
eyesight except
my pet bald eagle! Your monitor must be set for 240x320 DPI
Resolution to get it big enough to read. My next post will be in the 
same font
size that it is on my monitor. Can you really read it?
J.

Truman Prevatt wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> For what it is worth, I had no trouble reading it. A bit small but very 
> readable.  I'm using a Trinitron (18 inch across the diagonal) and 
> Netscape 7.
> 
> Truman
> 
> Jerry Olson wrote:
> 
> 
>>Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
>>What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
>>excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
>>still can't read that article.
>>
>>Jerry
>>
>>
>>Austin Franklin wrote:
>>
>>>A-ha!  Jerry, perhaps you ought get your eyes checked...if they can 
>>
>>correct
>>
>>>the problem, then you'd be able to see what the difference in 
>>
>>resolution vs
>>
>>>sharpness is...
>>>
>>>;-)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Roger, surely you couldn't actually read that? It has 1 point type!
>>>>
>>>>Jerry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>Roger
>>>>
>>>
>>>Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
>>
>>and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>>
>>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>>
>>>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
>>
>>to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>>this same page.
>>
>>>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>>>- Include your full name with your message.
>>>- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>>>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
>>
>>to keep them short.
>>
>>>- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
>>
>>header.
>>
>>>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>>
>>&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
>>
>>>- Complete your Yahoo profile.
>>>- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
>>
>>various resources on the homepage.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
>>
>>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>ADVERTISEMENT
>><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=233351.2287381.3722242.2225242/D=egroupweb/S=1705019182:HM/A=1212975/R=0/*http://www.gotomypc.com/u/tr/yh/grp/300_mapG/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls 
>>and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>>
>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>>
>>If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish 
>>to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting 
>>this same page.
>>
>>Please follow these basic guidelines:
>>- Include your full name with your message.
>>- Include the address of your website, if you have one.
>>- As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to 
>>keep them short.
>>- As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
>>- Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or 
>>&amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
>>- Complete your Yahoo profile.
>>- Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
>>various resources on the homepage.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service 
>><http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Joel Kurtz

> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> still can't read that article.
>
> > > > http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm


Jerry:

I can read it (though it'd be easier if the text were black instead of gray)
even if you add in my myopia and astigmatism.  I'n running IE5.5 on a Nanao
17" running at 1280x1024.


joel
jdkurtz@...
joel_kurtz@...

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

> My next post will be in the
> same font
> size that it is on my monitor. Can you really read it?
> J.

Er, Jerry...all posts (are supposed to) come though in text mode...no
embedded fonts...

Austin

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Stan McQueen

I also have a 21 inch monitor (Gateway VX1100--I have no idea who actually 
made it) set to 1600x1200 and have no trouble reading it.

Stan

At 01:04 PM 9/12/2002, Jerry Olson wrote:
>Forgive me Austin, But I feel you spin fables. I have a 22 inch monitor
>set for 600x800 and it is totally
>illegible. It's a very sharp monitor!
>
>Jerry
>
>Austin Franklin wrote:
> > Yes, Jerry, of course I can read it...from 18-20 inches away ;-)  I have a
> > Hitachi 801HR, it's a 21" and it's set for 1600 x 1200.
> >
> > Austin

================================
Photography by Stan McQueen
http://www.smcqueen.com

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Tim Atherton

Jerry,

I looked at at home this morning and on two different PC's at work this 
pm - all fine - smallish print but no smaller than on many other sites.

Certainly easy to read. I think you must have an odd browser setting...

tim


----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Kurtz" <jdkurtz@...>
Date: Thursday, September 12, 2002 1:16 pm
Show quoted textHide quoted text
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

> 
> > Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your 
> monitor?> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set 
> for.  My eyes are
> > excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  
> But I
> > still can't read that article.
> >
> > > > > 
> http://www.digitalfocus.net/sections/views/1DsRumour/1DsRelease.htm
> 
> Jerry:
> 
> I can read it (though it'd be easier if the text were black 
> instead of gray)
> even if you add in my myopia and astigmatism.  I'n running IE5.5 
> on a Nanao
> 17" running at 1280x1024.
> 
> 
> joel
> jdkurtz@...
> joel_kurtz@...
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------
> -~-->
> Plan to Sell a Home?
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/J2SnNA/y.lEAA/MVfIAA/ucIolB/TM
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --~->
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, 
> Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The 
> page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you 
> wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by 
> visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages 
> to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject 
> header.- Good manners are required at all time. No personal 
> attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the 
> various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Austin, I just tried Netscape 7 Which I downloaded yesterday. I can't 
believe it,
pages are now in 18 point type, and I can see everything! I was a bit 
weary of trying
it, because I thought it might screw up my older address books and such, 
but it didn't.
But when typing, I no longer have 72 character lines of type. I have to 
press return
at approximately that line length to get my lines of type to wrap.  I DO 
have it set
in Preferences for 72 characters, but it isn't working. I also have my 
color choices set
and they don't work either.

Jerry

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

It wasn't embedded, it was chosen in the preferences of netscape... It 
was 8 points, MUCH
larger than the canon website's text...

Jerry

Austin Franklin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>>My next post will be in the
>>same font
>>size that it is on my monitor. Can you really read it?
>>J.
> 
> 
> Er, Jerry...all posts (are supposed to) come though in text mode...no
> embedded fonts...
> 
> Austin
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> 
> 
>

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

Jerry,

In order for anyone else to see these emails in anything but their own
native font/size, it must have embedded information in it, which HTML does.
What I was trying to say, is all these emails are TEXT only, and do not have
anything embedded...so no matter what you set YOUR font to, it will NOT show
the same on anyone else's computer (unless you two happen to select the same
font/size), simply because ALL email list posts are in text only...which has
NO font/size information, simply text...characters...only.

Austin
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> It wasn't embedded, it was chosen in the preferences of netscape... It
> was 8 points, MUCH
> larger than the canon website's text...
>
> Jerry
>
> Austin Franklin wrote:
> >>My next post will be in the
> >>same font
> >>size that it is on my monitor. Can you really read it?
> >>J.
> >
> >
> > Er, Jerry...all posts (are supposed to) come though in text mode...no
> > embedded fonts...
> >
> > Austin

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Bob Frost

Jerry,

I can read it on my 21" Diamond Pro at 1600x1200, so if you can't read it at
800x600 there must be something wrong with your eyesight! I suggested that
to you a year ago when you were arguing about sharpness, but you said your
eyesight was perfect. Maybe it was then, but I think a trip to the optician
is in order, and then you might be able to realise how sharp Nikon lenses
are!!

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message -----
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "Jerry Olson" <jerryolson@...>


> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> still can't read that article.

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

So Solly Kemo Sab\ufffd, I forgot about that! :)

Jerry
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> In order for anyone else to see these emails in anything but their own
> native font/size, it must have embedded information in it, which HTML does.
> What I was trying to say, is all these emails are TEXT only, and do not have
> anything embedded...so no matter what you set YOUR font to,

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Moreno Polloni

> Austin, you are telling me you can actually read this on your monitor?
> What monitor do you have and what resolution is it set for.  My eyes are
> excellent on close up things, not so hot at medium distances.  But I
> still can't read that article.

I'm running a 17" monitor at 1280 x 1024 (which makes for tiny text). My
eyesight is only average, yet I can read the article from 4 ft. away.

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Austin Franklin

> ...Kemo Sab\ufffd...

Hey, doesn't that mean "back end of horse" in Apache?

;-)

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Bob, I just explained all of that in a long post a few minutes ago to 
Austin. It's just
fine when I adjust my glasses accordingly. 20/20 at exactly 5 inches 
away from the monitor
without glasses. At 4 and 6 inches, it's a total blur. I have to change 
my glasses
for every distance I see at by pulling them out or pushing them in. I 
have 5 different
pairs of glasses for different distances, and when the appropriate pair is
worn, everything is sharp AT THE DISTANCE Focused on. It's like looking 
through
an F 1.0 lens at 1.0. ONLY the object I focus on is sharp, but it IS 
sharp. I know of
nobody else who has this eye defect, or has even heard of it. Not even 
my optometrist
has ever seen another person with this eyesight conditon.

The old netscape program was presenting the canon site at much smaller 
type than
5 points, as I CAN read 5 point type.

I get my eyes checked every 6 months, and have for 20 years. My color 
vision is 100
percent perfect, I got every sample of the dots correct in my last test.

Jerry

Whoever said Nikon lenses weren't sharp? I Owned Nikon equipment for 20 
years.
I Only had one lens that was a real dog.   (I'm a cat person, of course). :)
and then you might be able to realise how sharp Nikon lenses
> are!!
>

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Moreno you have FAR better vision than 20/20 if you could read the text on
the canon site that was coming up on my monitor from 4 feet. I will say 
it again.

I CAN READ 5 POINT TYPE! NO PROBLEM!

THis type was more than twice as small as that!!

Jerry

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

No, it's Who Knows? in Spanish.

Jerry

Austin Franklin wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>>...Kemo Sab\ufffd...
> 
> 
> Hey, doesn't that mean "back end of horse" in Apache?
>

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Tim Atherton

Now - even more OT than how big the font size is.... :-)


> No, it's Who Knows? in Spanish.
> 
> Jerry
> 
> Austin Franklin wrote:
> >>...Kemo Sabé...
> > 
> > 
> > Hey, doesn't that mean "back end of horse" in Apache?

The origin and meaning of the words "kemo sabe", often heard in in Lone 
Ranger stories, are often debated. The first use of the words 
apparently occurred in an episode in which Tonto is helping a severely 
wounded Texas Ranger recover from injuries inflicted by The Cavendish 
Gang. Tonto and the Ranger recognize each other as childhood friends, 
when they called each other "kemo sabe" (faithful friend). 
Fran Striker (senior) was a well-renowned writer of several OTR 
favorites, including The Lone Ranger, Covered Wagon Days, The Green 
Hornet, and Ned Jordan, Secret Agent. His son, Fran Striker, Jr. 
relates the story of the origin of the words "kemo sabe". 



Now,  About Kemo Sabay (Sabe)-- (It was first introduced as ‘sabay,’
but soon became ‘sabe.’)    WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN?

It is a most interesting question... one that has been pondered and
investigated frequently throughout the decades.  In the past there
have been scholars who have conducted extensive research and studies
on the phrase... trying to develop the premise that in Kemo Sabay (as
with the name Tonto) there was a subtle discriminatory nuance
intended.  Logic usually seemed to dictate that those researchers look
the dialects native to the southwest for support.

The investigator, student or scholar, must realize that when this land
was discovered there were already some 220 mutually unintelligible
languages native the America north of the Rio Grande alone.  While it
may be logical to make geographical associations with the southwest
and the Spanish language, then put forth suppositions -- when dealing
in non-scientific areas (such as the creation of fiction) logic can be
quite misleading and the conclusions drawn quite incorrect.

In addition to writing the scripts, books, cartoon strips, and
personal appearance scenarios; my father was also charged with
answering fan letters to the Lone Ranger.  He always started his
replies with... "Ta-i ke-mo sah-bee (Greetings trusty scout)"  AND
this was Dad's only intended meaning of the term.   But still, there
have been many interesting, but incorrect, conclusions drawn (with no
negative implications intended) about the derivation of the phrase.

Many years ago, a Dr. Goddard, of the Smithsonian Institution, was
reported as believing that Kemo Sabe was from the Tewa dialect.  He
supported his contention by calling on the "Ethnogeography of the Tewa
Indians" which appeared in the 29th Annual Report of the Bureau of
American Ethnology (1916).  It seems that in Tewa, "Apache" equates to
Sabe and "friend" to Kema.

A scholar from the University of California at Berkley hypothesized
that Kemo Sabe came from the Yavapai, a dialect spoken in Arizona.  He
suggested that my Dad could have asked a source in Arizonia for the
Indian term for "one who is white," or shown a picture of the Ranger
(in the white shirt and trousers he wore in the earliest publicity
photos) and asked for a descriptive name. A Yavapai would respond
(correctly) kinmasaba or kinmasabeh.

So what's the truth?  One must look at practicality rather than logic.
An article in an old Saturday Evening Post magazine claims that Tonto
was supposed to be a Potawatomi Indian, from the great lakes area.
(Now that's practical... at the time Dad had never been west of
Buffalo, New York and the program was launched from WXYZ in Detroit,
Michigan.)  In research for my book, I came across another old
reference-- a photograph of a children's camp in the northern part of
Michigan.  The photo was from the early 1930s and showed the camp
entrance.  It was named camp "Ke Mo Sah Bee."  The accompanying
caption pointed out that the name stood for "trusty friend" or "trusty
scout."  These two tidbits from history dovetail nicely and are in
keeping with the meaning of the term as officially stated for the last
sixty some years.

It has been written that Jim Jewell, the radio programs dramatic
director in the early years and a native of Michigan, originally
suggested the phrase to my dad.  In light of everything else, I find
that to be a credible claim.

Most recently, I became aware of yet another (humorous) meaning of the
phrase.  In his book of humor and observation, noted columnist James
Smart observes that the New York Public Library defines Kemo Sabe as
Soggy Shrub. His entertaining collection is appropriately titled
"Soggy Shrub Rides Again and other improbabilities."

Allow me just one final note on Kemo Sabe... an interesting side
light.  It is usually assumed that Kemo Sabe is how the Ranger refers
to Tonto. However, in many of the early radio broadcasts, the Ranger
calls Tonto Kemo Sabe AND Tonto also calls the Ranger Kemo Sabe.

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by bigheadbloggs

Jerry,

I too am using Netscape Comm. 4.79 on a Mac, and that page came up with 
miniscule totally unreadable text on my screen as well (ViewSonic 17" 
1024x768).

My solution was to go to Edit->Prefs->Appearance->Fonts and set both 
Fixed and Variable font settings in "Use My Fonts" to Arial 18 pt.  
Then I checked the radio button for "use my fonts, over riding page 
specific fonts".

However, this did not work the first time. Had to then check "disable 
dynamic fonts", reload page, then went back to prefs and selected "use 
my fonts". Dont know why, but then it worked and i got nice big fonts.

There are several ways a web designer can set font sizes in a page. Not 
all browser/platform combinations interpret these different font "tags"  
the same way. That is probably why most people, using PC's or IE, did 
not have the same problem you and I ran into.

Did you ever use NS6? I am reluctant to move to NS7, because NS6 was 
such a nightmarish travesty for both my computer and web designing!!! 
And, does NS7 have the "Messenger" email component that Communicator 
has? Probably not, so now we are forced to use a separate email client 
program.

AOL, which bought Netscape, seems to have turned it into complete 
garbage and now, like Microsoft, will force mediocrity (at best!) down 
all our throats! Oh oh, now I am in big trouble. Should have kept my 
damn mouth shut. Time to go back into hiding.

dan s.

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Austin, You are amazing. a detailed answer for everything.  
I asked our barber who is mexican what it meant, and he said colloquial
for "who knows"?  I'm Norwegian, so what do I know?

It may be a local dialect. "who knows" wouldn't make a lot of sense...

Now for the big question. What, EXACTLY does Speedy Gonzales mean when
he says ARRrrriba! Ondale !??

Jerry

Tim Atherton wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> Now - even more OT than how big the font size is.... :-)
> 
> > No, it's Who Knows? in Spanish.
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > Austin Franklin wrote:
> > >>...Kemo Sab\ufffd...
> > >
> > >
> > > Hey, doesn't that mean "back end of horse" in Apache?
> 
> The origin and meaning of the words "kemo sabe", often heard in in Lone
> Ranger stories, are often debated. The first use of the words
> apparently occurred in an episode in which Tonto is helping a severely
> wounded Texas Ranger recover from injuries inflicted by The Cavendish
> Gang. Tonto and the Ranger recognize each other as childhood friends,
> when they called each other "kemo sabe" (faithful friend).
> Fran Striker (senior) was a well-renowned writer of several OTR
> favorites, including The Lone Ranger, Covered Wagon Days, The Green
> Hornet, and Ned Jordan, Secret Agent. His son, Fran Striker, Jr.
> relates the story of the origin of the words "kemo sabe".
> 
> Now,  About Kemo Sabay (Sabe)-- (It was first introduced as \ufffdsabay,\ufffd
> but soon became \ufffdsabe.\ufffd)    WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN?
> 
> It is a most interesting question... one that has been pondered and
> investigated frequently throughout the decades.  In the past there
> have been scholars who have conducted extensive research and studies
> on the phrase... trying to develop the premise that in Kemo Sabay (as
> with the name Tonto) there was a subtle discriminatory nuance
> intended.  Logic usually seemed to dictate that those researchers look
> the dialects native to the southwest for support.
> 
> The investigator, student or scholar, must realize that when this land
> was discovered there were already some 220 mutually unintelligible
> languages native the America north of the Rio Grande alone.  While it
> may be logical to make geographical associations with the southwest
> and the Spanish language, then put forth suppositions -- when dealing
> in non-scientific areas (such as the creation of fiction) logic can be
> quite misleading and the conclusions drawn quite incorrect.
> 
> In addition to writing the scripts, books, cartoon strips, and
> personal appearance scenarios; my father was also charged with
> answering fan letters to the Lone Ranger.  He always started his
> replies with... "Ta-i ke-mo sah-bee (Greetings trusty scout)"  AND
> this was Dad's only intended meaning of the term.   But still, there
> have been many interesting, but incorrect, conclusions drawn (with no
> negative implications intended) about the derivation of the phrase.
> 
> Many years ago, a Dr. Goddard, of the Smithsonian Institution, was
> reported as believing that Kemo Sabe was from the Tewa dialect.  He
> supported his contention by calling on the "Ethnogeography of the Tewa
> Indians" which appeared in the 29th Annual Report of the Bureau of
> American Ethnology (1916).  It seems that in Tewa, "Apache" equates to
> Sabe and "friend" to Kema.
> 
> A scholar from the University of California at Berkley hypothesized
> that Kemo Sabe came from the Yavapai, a dialect spoken in Arizona.  He
> suggested that my Dad could have asked a source in Arizonia for the
> Indian term for "one who is white," or shown a picture of the Ranger
> (in the white shirt and trousers he wore in the earliest publicity
> photos) and asked for a descriptive name. A Yavapai would respond
> (correctly) kinmasaba or kinmasabeh.
> 
> So what's the truth?  One must look at practicality rather than logic.
> An article in an old Saturday Evening Post magazine claims that Tonto
> was supposed to be a Potawatomi Indian, from the great lakes area.
> (Now that's practical... at the time Dad had never been west of
> Buffalo, New York and the program was launched from WXYZ in Detroit,
> Michigan.)  In research for my book, I came across another old
> reference-- a photograph of a children's camp in the northern part of
> Michigan.  The photo was from the early 1930s and showed the camp
> entrance.  It was named camp "Ke Mo Sah Bee."  The accompanying
> caption pointed out that the name stood for "trusty friend" or "trusty
> scout."  These two tidbits from history dovetail nicely and are in
> keeping with the meaning of the term as officially stated for the last
> sixty some years.
> 
> It has been written that Jim Jewell, the radio programs dramatic
> director in the early years and a native of Michigan, originally
> suggested the phrase to my dad.  In light of everything else, I find
> that to be a credible claim.
> 
> Most recently, I became aware of yet another (humorous) meaning of the
> phrase.  In his book of humor and observation, noted columnist James
> Smart observes that the New York Public Library defines Kemo Sabe as
> Soggy Shrub. His entertaining collection is appropriately titled
> "Soggy Shrub Rides Again and other improbabilities."
> 
> Allow me just one final note on Kemo Sabe... an interesting side
> light.  It is usually assumed that Kemo Sabe is how the Ranger refers
> to Tonto. However, in many of the early radio broadcasts, the Ranger
> calls Tonto Kemo Sabe AND Tonto also calls the Ranger Kemo Sabe.
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;amp;quot;flames.&amp;amp;quot;
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-12 by Jerry Olson

Hi Dan,

Thank God someone else can confirm this! I KNEW it was smaller than small!!!

I think Netscape 7 has messenger, but there are changes, you have to get new
messages from the top left of the screen now, not click on an icon. I
just started
using it, so don't know much about it.


> I too am using Netscape Comm. 4.79 on a Mac, and that page came up with
> miniscule totally unreadable text on my screen as well (ViewSonic 17"
> 1024x768).
>
> There are several ways a web designer can set font sizes in a page. Not
> all browser/platform combinations interpret these different font "tags"
> the same way. That is probably why most people, using PC's or IE, did
> not have the same problem you and I ran into.
> 
> Did you ever use NS6? 
No, I was warned it was totally unusable and I'd have nothing but
headaches, so never did use it.

I am reluctant to move to NS7, because NS6 was
> such a nightmarish travesty for both my computer and web designing!!!
> And, does NS7 have the "Messenger" email component that Communicator
> has? Probably not, so now we are forced to use a separate email client
> program.

I'm not using any separate e mail client, so suspect it is messenger.

Jerry

RE: [Digital BW] Canon OOPS

2002-09-13 by Austin Franklin

Jerry,

That detailed answer wasn't mine, it came from Tim Atherton, as noted below.
My comment was about "back end of horse", which is from a Gary Larson
comic...which, I thought, was quite funny ;-)

Regards,

Austin
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Austin, You are amazing. a detailed answer for everything.
> I asked our barber who is mexican what it meant, and he said colloquial
> for "who knows"?  I'm Norwegian, so what do I know?
>
> It may be a local dialect. "who knows" wouldn't make a lot of sense...
>
> Now for the big question. What, EXACTLY does Speedy Gonzales mean when
> he says ARRrrriba! Ondale !??
>
> Jerry
>
> Tim Atherton wrote:
> >
> > Now - even more OT than how big the font size is.... :-)
> >
> > > No, it's Who Knows? in Spanish.
> > >
> > > Jerry
> > >
> > > Austin Franklin wrote:
> > > >>...Kemo Sab\ufffd...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey, doesn't that mean "back end of horse" in Apache?
> >
> > The origin and meaning of the words "kemo sabe", often heard in in Lone
> > Ranger stories, are often debated. The first use of the words
> > apparently occurred in an episode in which Tonto is helping a severely
> > wounded Texas Ranger recover from injuries inflicted by The Cavendish
> > Gang. Tonto and the Ranger recognize each other as childhood friends,
> > when they called each other "kemo sabe" (faithful friend).
> > Fran Striker (senior) was a well-renowned writer of several OTR
> > favorites, including The Lone Ranger, Covered Wagon Days, The Green
> > Hornet, and Ned Jordan, Secret Agent. His son, Fran Striker, Jr.
> > relates the story of the origin of the words "kemo sabe".
> >
> > Now,  About Kemo Sabay (Sabe)-- (It was first introduced as \ufffdsabay,\ufffd
> > but soon became \ufffdsabe.\ufffd)    WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN?
> >
> > It is a most interesting question... one that has been pondered and
> > investigated frequently throughout the decades.  In the past there
> > have been scholars who have conducted extensive research and studies
> > on the phrase... trying to develop the premise that in Kemo Sabay (as
> > with the name Tonto) there was a subtle discriminatory nuance
> > intended.  Logic usually seemed to dictate that those researchers look
> > the dialects native to the southwest for support.
> >
> > The investigator, student or scholar, must realize that when this land
> > was discovered there were already some 220 mutually unintelligible
> > languages native the America north of the Rio Grande alone.  While it
> > may be logical to make geographical associations with the southwest
> > and the Spanish language, then put forth suppositions -- when dealing
> > in non-scientific areas (such as the creation of fiction) logic can be
> > quite misleading and the conclusions drawn quite incorrect.
> >
> > In addition to writing the scripts, books, cartoon strips, and
> > personal appearance scenarios; my father was also charged with
> > answering fan letters to the Lone Ranger.  He always started his
> > replies with... "Ta-i ke-mo sah-bee (Greetings trusty scout)"  AND
> > this was Dad's only intended meaning of the term.   But still, there
> > have been many interesting, but incorrect, conclusions drawn (with no
> > negative implications intended) about the derivation of the phrase.
> >
> > Many years ago, a Dr. Goddard, of the Smithsonian Institution, was
> > reported as believing that Kemo Sabe was from the Tewa dialect.  He
> > supported his contention by calling on the "Ethnogeography of the Tewa
> > Indians" which appeared in the 29th Annual Report of the Bureau of
> > American Ethnology (1916).  It seems that in Tewa, "Apache" equates to
> > Sabe and "friend" to Kema.
> >
> > A scholar from the University of California at Berkley hypothesized
> > that Kemo Sabe came from the Yavapai, a dialect spoken in Arizona.  He
> > suggested that my Dad could have asked a source in Arizonia for the
> > Indian term for "one who is white," or shown a picture of the Ranger
> > (in the white shirt and trousers he wore in the earliest publicity
> > photos) and asked for a descriptive name. A Yavapai would respond
> > (correctly) kinmasaba or kinmasabeh.
> >
> > So what's the truth?  One must look at practicality rather than logic.
> > An article in an old Saturday Evening Post magazine claims that Tonto
> > was supposed to be a Potawatomi Indian, from the great lakes area.
> > (Now that's practical... at the time Dad had never been west of
> > Buffalo, New York and the program was launched from WXYZ in Detroit,
> > Michigan.)  In research for my book, I came across another old
> > reference-- a photograph of a children's camp in the northern part of
> > Michigan.  The photo was from the early 1930s and showed the camp
> > entrance.  It was named camp "Ke Mo Sah Bee."  The accompanying
> > caption pointed out that the name stood for "trusty friend" or "trusty
> > scout."  These two tidbits from history dovetail nicely and are in
> > keeping with the meaning of the term as officially stated for the last
> > sixty some years.
> >
> > It has been written that Jim Jewell, the radio programs dramatic
> > director in the early years and a native of Michigan, originally
> > suggested the phrase to my dad.  In light of everything else, I find
> > that to be a credible claim.
> >
> > Most recently, I became aware of yet another (humorous) meaning of the
> > phrase.  In his book of humor and observation, noted columnist James
> > Smart observes that the New York Public Library defines Kemo Sabe as
> > Soggy Shrub. His entertaining collection is appropriately titled
> > "Soggy Shrub Rides Again and other improbabilities."
> >
> > Allow me just one final note on Kemo Sabe... an interesting side
> > light.  It is usually assumed that Kemo Sabe is how the Ranger refers
> > to Tonto. However, in many of the early radio broadcasts, the Ranger
> > calls Tonto Kemo Sabe AND Tonto also calls the Ranger Kemo Sabe.
> >

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.