Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

2005-09-19 by Steve Kale

I am thinking about buying some framing equipment.  Any views re FrameCo equipment?  For 
example, the 1060B mat cutter vs, say, the Logan Simplex Plus 750 which is much more 
expensive.  What about joiners and saws.

Thanks

Steve

RE: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

2005-09-20 by Ken Carney

Steve, 

I have in the past bought some of this gear to do my own framing.  It's all
gone now.  My 2c would be to hire it out, which is what I do now.  I finally
found an artist, a painter, who does framing to supplement her income.  She
knows my framing formula, so all I have to do is give her prints.  The other
day she framed 15 prints (16x20 gallery frames, museum rag board with a
floating window beautifully cut) for $525 including materials.  There is no
way I would do that myself when I could use that time to take more photos.
Absent that alternative, all I can tell you is to spend about twice as much
or more than you think you need on a mat cutter, to keep your sanity.  I
really suggest trying the Logan and then trying a professional cutter such
as the C&H - about $1,200 with accessories.  

  --Ken
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Kale
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:28 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?
> 
> I am thinking about buying some framing equipment.  Any views 
> re FrameCo equipment?  For example, the 1060B mat cutter vs, 
> say, the Logan Simplex Plus 750 which is much more expensive. 
>  What about joiners and saws.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Steve

Re: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

2005-09-20 by Steve Kale

If I could get 15 prints archival framed for $525 I doubt I would be looking
into this.  In the UK that would cost me at least $3,200 !!  Even if I order
from Frame Destination in the US it would cost around $2,000.   It seems
most moulding suppliers offer a chop service which probably sounds like it's
worth paying for - no saws and perfect mitres.  I am not up for a C&H mat
cutter - amortising $1,200 (assuming I pay US prices) would take a while. I
am wondering if the Logan or Frameco cutter is for all practical purposes
just as good albeit not necessarily as "built to last".  (Not even many
frame shops use a computerised cutter.)  I would want to cut 8 ply mats
comfortably.  As for the joining equipment this seems fairly straight
forward.  I don't need a pneumatic machine as I am comfortable my volumes
aren't going to exhaust my arm and it seems even the Logan/FrameCo options
will comfortably drive into even hard woods.

Steve
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> From: Ken Carney <kcarney1@...>
> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 20:12:24 -0500
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?
> 
> Steve, 
> 
> I have in the past bought some of this gear to do my own framing.  It's all
> gone now.  My 2c would be to hire it out, which is what I do now.  I finally
> found an artist, a painter, who does framing to supplement her income.  She
> knows my framing formula, so all I have to do is give her prints.  The other
> day she framed 15 prints (16x20 gallery frames, museum rag board with a
> floating window beautifully cut) for $525 including materials.  There is no
> way I would do that myself when I could use that time to take more photos.
> Absent that alternative, all I can tell you is to spend about twice as much
> or more than you think you need on a mat cutter, to keep your sanity.  I
> really suggest trying the Logan and then trying a professional cutter such
> as the C&H - about $1,200 with accessories.
> 
>   --Ken

RE: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

2005-09-20 by John Moody

Steve,
It sounds like you are asking "is this D/A good enough".   You know the
drill..

In the states, there are do it yourself frame shops that let you make frames
with sub-standard tools, i.e. hammer and entry-level corner vise.  If you
have access to the same, it might be worth trying one out to see if you are
satisfied.
I use a Logan, and get good results with slow methodical practice and fresh
blades.  If I try to hurry it, there is a tendency to get cuts that are not
perfectly straight.  I don't use 8-ply so I don't know if that would be any
different other than just harder on the arms.

Best regards,
John Moody
Show quoted textHide quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Steve Kale
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 4:41 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Framing - Any views on FrameCo products?

If I could get 15 prints archival framed for $525 I doubt I would be looking
into this.  In the UK that would cost me at least $3,200 !!  Even if I order
from Frame Destination in the US it would cost around $2,000.   It seems
most moulding suppliers offer a chop service which probably sounds like it's
worth paying for - no saws and perfect mitres.  I am not up for a C&H mat
cutter - amortising $1,200 (assuming I pay US prices) would take a while. I
am wondering if the Logan or Frameco cutter is for all practical purposes
just as good albeit not necessarily as "built to last".  (Not even many
frame shops use a computerised cutter.)  I would want to cut 8 ply mats
comfortably.  As for the joining equipment this seems fairly straight
forward.  I don't need a pneumatic machine as I am comfortable my volumes
aren't going to exhaust my arm and it seems even the Logan/FrameCo options
will comfortably drive into even hard woods.

Steve





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.