Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

RE: [Digital BW] Anyone using digital negatives to make Platinum prints?

RE: [Digital BW] Anyone using digital negatives to make Platinum prints?

2006-04-09 by Ken Carney

I went the imagesetter/inkjet negative route for a while.  My take on it is
that as expensive and time-consuming as platinum prints are, I thought an
in-camera negative developed for the process was quite a bit better.  You
can buy an 8x10 field camera pretty reasonably now, and for contact prints
the lens doesn't have to be a super star.  BTW you might start off with a
less costly process like palladium (pure palladium prints are beautiful),
Zia, Van Dyke brown or similar, until you get the hang of it.  For myself, I
finally went all the way to the dark side and all the prints are digital
now.

Ken 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On 
> Behalf Of G Guhan Gunaratnam
> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 3:41 PM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Anyone using digital negatives to make 
> Platinum prints?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I know this is a little OT, but not completely, so I was 
> hoping someone might want to chime in if they have experience 
> making digital negs with an inkjet/imagesetter and then 
> making platinum prints with them.
> 
> Please let me know on/off the board.  I'm reading Dan's book 
> now, but I'm a youngun and don't have a traditional darkroom. 
>  That could change though with prices as low as they are.
> 
> Any insights, annoyances, wishes, etc with the process are 
> appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Guhan

Re: [Digital BW] Anyone using digital negatives to make Platinum prints?

2006-04-10 by Jordan Wosnick

I've been experimenting with Van Dyke Brown using digital negatives. I 
am not using Mark Nelson or Dan Burkholder's systems, but am "winging 
it" and so far the (limited) results are very promising.

I am currently using the MIS-EZ inks in an Epson C86 and printing on 
Pictorico OHP. The digital negatives look awful when printed with 
canned settings, but when I dial down "brightness" the ink density is 
much improved.

Jordan

G Guhan Gunaratnam wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I know this is a little OT, but not completely, so I was hoping someone
> might want to chime in if they have experience making digital negs with an
> inkjet/imagesetter and then making platinum prints with them.
> 
> Please let me know on/off the board.  I'm reading Dan's book now, but I'm a
> youngun and don't have a traditional darkroom.  That could change though
> with prices as low as they are.
> 
> Any insights, annoyances, wishes, etc with the process are appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Guhan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
> - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
> - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> 
> BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 

-- 


Jordan Wosnick
jwosnick@...

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.