Yahoo Groups archive
Thread
2007-11-18 by kolwicz@minetfiber.com
I've just tested the new LaSal matte versus my old Kayenta and it is very close: making comparisons with my Epson V750 scanner I find that LaSal is slightly less bright and has slightly less overall range from paper white to d-Max. Anybody have any hard numbers? IT-8 test files look reasonably alike so that I might not need a new profile (my work is not that critical). Frank
2007-11-18 by Paul Roark
Lasal Lab L, A, B paper white = 95.7, 2.62, -4.12; 100% Eboni R260 QTR black = 16.8, 0.72, 0.44. Kayenta Lab L, A, B paper white = 95.5, 2.28, -3.81; 100% Eboni R1800 QTR black = 17.4, 0.73, 0.18 Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> _____
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kolwicz@... Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 4:51 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] LaSal and Kayenta matte papers I've just tested the new LaSal matte versus my old Kayenta and it is very close: making comparisons with my Epson V750 scanner I find that LaSal is slightly less bright and has slightly less overall range from paper white to d-Max. Anybody have any hard numbers? IT-8 test files look reasonably alike so that I might not need a new profile (my work is not that critical). Frank [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]