Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

7900 Review???

7900 Review???

2009-04-30 by photog0946

HELLO GROUPIES!

As you may have noticed, I've been rather preoccupied with a very sick printer for the past week. With all of the cleaning and TLC, along with some intensive communications with tech reps and service personnel, we have all come to the conclusion that one of my 7600 printers(MK) needs a new print head. This is what I have suspected all along and it has now been confirmed. So, I have a decision to make. And of course as always it all comes down to MONEY. It's going to cost about $900 to have a new head properly installed and warranted. I've been looking, with green eyes of envy, at a 7900, and that $900 I believe would be better spent on newer technology. I would then probably set up the remaining 7600 for B&W printing exclusively, with the sick one as a "spare part" repository. 

So here's my request. As quickly as possible, I would like to get some feedback concerning the 7900. Pros and cons, likes and dislikes, headaches and cheers of joy. All of the above and more if possible. From the research I've done so far it would seem to be the best thing to come down the line the from Epson to date. So hit me. Go the whole nine yards. Give it your best shots and hold nothing back. PLEASE!!!

My decision has almost been made, but I would love to hear from those of you with "hands on" experience.

Re: [Digital BW] 7900 Review???

2009-04-30 by Mark Savoia

It is all about the speed. Prints that took 2 hours on my 9600 now  
take 28 minutes on my 9900.

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:02 PM, photog0946 wrote:

> HELLO GROUPIES!
>
> As you may have noticed, I've been rather preoccupied with a very  
> sick printer for the past week. With all of the cleaning and TLC,  
> along with some intensive communications with tech reps and service  
> personnel, we have all come to the conclusion that one of my 7600  
> printers(MK) needs a new print head. This is what I have suspected  
> all along and it has now been confirmed. So, I have a decision to  
> make. And of course as always it all comes down to MONEY. It's going  
> to cost about $900 to have a new head properly installed and  
> warranted. I've been looking, with green eyes of envy, at a 7900,  
> and that $900 I believe would be better spent on newer technology. I  
> would then probably set up the remaining 7600 for B&W printing  
> exclusively, with the sick one as a "spare part" repository.
>
> So here's my request. As quickly as possible, I would like to get  
> some feedback concerning the 7900. Pros and cons, likes and  
> dislikes, headaches and cheers of joy. All of the above and more if  
> possible. From the research I've done so far it would seem to be the  
> best thing to come down the line the from Epson to date. So hit me.  
> Go the whole nine yards. Give it your best shots and hold nothing  
> back. PLEASE!!!
>
> My decision has almost been made, but I would love to hear from  
> those of you with "hands on" experience.
>

Re: [Digital BW] 7900 Review???

2009-05-01 by Tyler Boley

but no QTR support or the possibility to put any other ink in it, so only Almost Black and White...
right?

for color though, wouldn't turn one away...
Tyler

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia <mark@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> It is all about the speed. Prints that took 2 hours on my 9600 now  
> take 28 minutes on my 9900.
> 
> Mark
> http://www.stillrivereditions.com
> 
> On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:02 PM, photog0946 wrote:
> 
> > HELLO GROUPIES!
> >
> > As you may have noticed, I've been rather preoccupied with a very  
> > sick printer for the past week. With all of the cleaning and TLC,  
> > along with some intensive communications with tech reps and service  
> > personnel, we have all come to the conclusion that one of my 7600  
> > printers(MK) needs a new print head. This is what I have suspected  
> > all along and it has now been confirmed. So, I have a decision to  
> > make. And of course as always it all comes down to MONEY. It's going  
> > to cost about $900 to have a new head properly installed and  
> > warranted. I've been looking, with green eyes of envy, at a 7900,  
> > and that $900 I believe would be better spent on newer technology. I  
> > would then probably set up the remaining 7600 for B&W printing  
> > exclusively, with the sick one as a "spare part" repository.
> >
> > So here's my request. As quickly as possible, I would like to get  
> > some feedback concerning the 7900. Pros and cons, likes and  
> > dislikes, headaches and cheers of joy. All of the above and more if  
> > possible. From the research I've done so far it would seem to be the  
> > best thing to come down the line the from Epson to date. So hit me.  
> > Go the whole nine yards. Give it your best shots and hold nothing  
> > back. PLEASE!!!
> >
> > My decision has almost been made, but I would love to hear from  
> > those of you with "hands on" experience.
> >
>

Re: [Digital BW] 7900 Review???

2009-05-01 by photog0946

Hello Tyler,

This is one of the issues I was hoping to cover in this thread. As we all know, there have been various problems achieving a good quality B&W inkjet print. Of course the technology has been improving in this area, but I'd like to get some first hand feedback if possible. I've read several posts that indicate some very good results with the 7900/9900 printers. I use QTR as well and find it to be very efficient and repeatable, so one would hope that it could become 7900/9900 friendly. I haven't visited Roys site recently, so I don't know what the word is concerning that issue. I suspect he is working on it if it's a possibility at all. I'll take a peek in the QTR forum.

Gary


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> but no QTR support or the possibility to put any other ink in it, so only Almost Black and White...
> right?
> 
> for color though, wouldn't turn one away...
> Tyler
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia <mark@> wrote:
> >
> > It is all about the speed. Prints that took 2 hours on my 9600 now  
> > take 28 minutes on my 9900.
> > 
> > Mark
> > http://www.stillrivereditions.com
> > 
> > On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:02 PM, photog0946 wrote:
> > 
> > > HELLO GROUPIES!
> > >
> > > As you may have noticed, I've been rather preoccupied with a very  
> > > sick printer for the past week. With all of the cleaning and TLC,  
> > > along with some intensive communications with tech reps and service  
> > > personnel, we have all come to the conclusion that one of my 7600  
> > > printers(MK) needs a new print head. This is what I have suspected  
> > > all along and it has now been confirmed. So, I have a decision to  
> > > make. And of course as always it all comes down to MONEY. It's going  
> > > to cost about $900 to have a new head properly installed and  
> > > warranted. I've been looking, with green eyes of envy, at a 7900,  
> > > and that $900 I believe would be better spent on newer technology. I  
> > > would then probably set up the remaining 7600 for B&W printing  
> > > exclusively, with the sick one as a "spare part" repository.
> > >
> > > So here's my request. As quickly as possible, I would like to get  
> > > some feedback concerning the 7900. Pros and cons, likes and  
> > > dislikes, headaches and cheers of joy. All of the above and more if  
> > > possible. From the research I've done so far it would seem to be the  
> > > best thing to come down the line the from Epson to date. So hit me.  
> > > Go the whole nine yards. Give it your best shots and hold nothing  
> > > back. PLEASE!!!
> > >
> > > My decision has almost been made, but I would love to hear from  
> > > those of you with "hands on" experience.
> > >
> >
>

Re: [Digital BW] 7900 Review???

2009-05-01 by Gerald Davey

It is interesting that Epson supplies in it's promo literature a  
thumbs up from Chris Rainer (siic?) speaking about it's linearity.  
He's certainly an outstanding B&W artist, but it would be GREAT to  
get a fuller statement directly from him! Anybody got an idea?

Remember: It really does seem that Epson is locking you in completely  
with this new line. It seems to me - strongly - that what is  
beautiful and fulfilling - does depend on really seeing the end  
product - and over and over.


G. Davey




On May 1, 2009, at 8:45 AM, photog0946 wrote:

>
>
> Hello Tyler,
>
> This is one of the issues I was hoping to cover in this thread. As  
> we all know, there have been various problems achieving a good  
> quality B&W inkjet print. Of course the technology has been  
> improving in this area, but I'd like to get some first hand  
> feedback if possible. I've read several posts that indicate some  
> very good results with the 7900/9900 printers. I use QTR as well  
> and find it to be very efficient and repeatable, so one would hope  
> that it could become 7900/9900 friendly. I haven't visited Roys  
> site recently, so I don't know what the word is concerning that  
> issue. I suspect he is working on it if it's a possibility at all.  
> I'll take a peek in the QTR forum.
>
> Gary
>
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley"  
> <tyler@...> wrote:
> >
> > but no QTR support or the possibility to put any other ink in it,  
> so only Almost Black and White...
> > right?
> >
> > for color though, wouldn't turn one away...
> > Tyler
> >
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Mark Savoia  
> <mark@> wrote:
> > >
> > > It is all about the speed. Prints that took 2 hours on my 9600 now
> > > take 28 minutes on my 9900.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > > http://www.stillrivereditions.com
> > >
> > > On Apr 30, 2009, at 5:02 PM, photog0946 wrote:
> > >
> > > > HELLO GROUPIES!
> > > >
> > > > As you may have noticed, I've been rather preoccupied with a  
> very
> > > > sick printer for the past week. With all of the cleaning and  
> TLC,
> > > > along with some intensive communications with tech reps and  
> service
> > > > personnel, we have all come to the conclusion that one of my  
> 7600
> > > > printers(MK) needs a new print head. This is what I have  
> suspected
> > > > all along and it has now been confirmed. So, I have a  
> decision to
> > > > make. And of course as always it all comes down to MONEY.  
> It's going
> > > > to cost about $900 to have a new head properly installed and
> > > > warranted. I've been looking, with green eyes of envy, at a  
> 7900,
> > > > and that $900 I believe would be better spent on newer  
> technology. I
> > > > would then probably set up the remaining 7600 for B&W printing
> > > > exclusively, with the sick one as a "spare part" repository.
> > > >
> > > > So here's my request. As quickly as possible, I would like to  
> get
> > > > some feedback concerning the 7900. Pros and cons, likes and
> > > > dislikes, headaches and cheers of joy. All of the above and  
> more if
> > > > possible. From the research I've done so far it would seem to  
> be the
> > > > best thing to come down the line the from Epson to date. So  
> hit me.
> > > > Go the whole nine yards. Give it your best shots and hold  
> nothing
> > > > back. PLEASE!!!
> > > >
> > > > My decision has almost been made, but I would love to hear from
> > > > those of you with "hands on" experience.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.