Yahoo Groups archive

Doepfer

Index last updated: 2026-04-29 00:15 UTC

Thread

Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-09 by Joachim

Hello there,

there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399

Short summary:

a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard 
housings supports +5V
b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have a separate 
digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board => power 
supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.

Necessary steps:

For a:
1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made Meanwell 
T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with 
5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other 
manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with 
+5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.

For b:
2. Change the specification for the power connection so that one of the 
three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other 
two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
old specification with the downside of more noise which is what happens
at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail without a
separate digital ground.
3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the separate digital 
ground.

While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a big demand
for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections 
for modules which use the specification, force the manufactures who are 
ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to 
connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed connector 
bus boards.

Cheers
Joachim

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by James Husted

As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV converter. Of all the manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and Analog Systems are the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to +5 on the module so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there would use this separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital ground>Analog ground a real problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it is isolated on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the supply. More should convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very few modules that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus - IIRC Scott Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his modules and nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers all convert over to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
-James

**Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for Synthwerks and have to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the +12v supply to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There seems to be a lot of modules that require it.


James Husted
Designer, Synthwerks LLC
www.synthwerks.com
james@synthwerks.com
synthwerks@me.com
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:

> Hello there,
> 
> there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
> the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> 
> Short summary:
> 
> a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard 
> housings supports +5V
> b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have a separate 
> digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board => power 
> supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
> 
> Necessary steps:
> 
> For a:
> 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made Meanwell 
> T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with 
> 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other 
> manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with 
> +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
> 
> For b:
> 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that one of the 
> three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other 
> two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
> old specification with the downside of more noise which is what happens
> at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail without a
> separate digital ground.
> 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
> 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the separate digital 
> ground.
> 
> While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a big demand
> for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections 
> for modules which use the specification, force the manufactures who are 
> ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to 
> connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
> I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed connector 
> bus boards.
> 
> Cheers
> Joachim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
>

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by yahoo@doepfer.de

> As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup
> that requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV
> converter. Of all the manufacturers out there I think that
> Analogue Solutions and Analog Systems are the only companies in
> the eurorack format that require a separate +5v signal - all the
> digital modules I know of convert the +12V to +5 on the module so
> the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not
> just something Doepfer is doing....

That's right. All newer modules with digital elements generate the required
+5V from +12V (e.g. A-112, A-149-1, A-187-1, A-189-1). Only our "ancient"
modules A-190-1 and A-113 still require +5V and this can be obtained by
means of the A-100AD5 adapter. At the next opportunity we redesign these
modules so that no longer +5V is required.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer

(P.S. I'm not in the company from tomorrow/Thursday to Monday).

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by sonicwarrior@gmx.de

Hi,

the chicken/egg problem is discussed at Muffwiggler's, too. I'll just quote daverj from the 'some frustration w/ Zeus and POWER' thread:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649

<quote>
The 5 volt power issue being talked about in a couple of other threads is more about planning for the future, and maybe changing things for the better. The current state of affairs with 5 volts is in a "chicken or the egg" state. 

1 - manufactures who design a module that could use lots of 5 volts, only sometimes use the 5 volt bus because the cases today typically have no 5 volts or a limited amount of it. 

2 - the case manufacturers don't add large 5 volt supplies because the majority of modules don't use the 5 volt bus. 

3 - loop back to #1 

The 5 volt thread is trying to convince people to break the above cycle by making large 5 volt supplies standard so that module designers will start using the bus more.
</quote>

Btw. the ZEUS power supply from Tip Top Audio already has a dedicated +5V power supply, see:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105

The module manufacturers won't change anything until there is a broad on-board supply for +5V which means that Doepfer as the Eurorack grandfather has to step in or nothing will ever change.

I myself will stop buying any housing until there is a +5V supply in there.
I will also not buy any module with an on-board +5V regulator which draws current from the +12V rail without the option of using the +5V rail instead. That concretely means I won't buy the A-187-1 and A-189-1 which are on my want list until then.

Wir sind das Volk!

Greetings
Joachim

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:38:51 -0800
> Von: James Husted <james.husted@mac.com>
> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

> As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that
> requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV converter. Of all the
> manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and Analog Systems are
> the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v
> signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to +5 on the module
> so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just
> something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there would use this
> separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital ground>Analog ground a real
> problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it is isolated
> on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do
> convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the supply. More should
> convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very few modules
> that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus - IIRC Scott
> Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his modules and
> nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers all convert over
> to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the
> non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
> -James
> 
> **Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for Synthwerks and have
> to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the +12v supply
> to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I
> have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There seems to be a
> lot of modules that require it.
> 
> 
> James Husted
> Designer, Synthwerks LLC
> www.synthwerks.com
> james@synthwerks.com
> synthwerks@me.com
> 
> 
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:
> 
> > Hello there,
> > 
> > there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
> > the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
> > http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> > 
> > Short summary:
> > 
> > a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard 
> > housings supports +5V
> > b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have a separate 
> > digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board => power 
> > supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
> > 
> > Necessary steps:
> > 
> > For a:
> > 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made Meanwell 
> > T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with 
> > 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other 
> > manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with 
> > +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
> > 
> > For b:
> > 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that one of the 
> > three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other 
> > two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
> > old specification with the downside of more noise which is what happens
> > at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail without a
> > separate digital ground.
> > 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
> > 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the separate digital 
> > ground.
> > 
> > While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a big demand
> > for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections 
> > for modules which use the specification, force the manufactures who are 
> > ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to 
> > connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
> > I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed connector 
> > bus boards.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Joachim
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!  
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by york luethje

So let me get this straight: The thread you refer to is about a guy who buys a 
Zeus DIY power supply from TipTop Audio which he can't use because he has no 
idea how to DIY (using DIY very loosely here). Instead of acklowdging the limits 
of his abilities and buying a finished ZEUS he goes into a long rant, 
culminating in the gem that 'Dieter doesn't care' - Dieter of course having 
nothing to do whatsoever with TipTop Audio.

Perusing the second thread on Muffwiggler there appears to be indded a problem 
with power drain when using lots of digital modules on the same rail. I think 
it's pretty clear that the solution is not to scrap the original standard, as 
that would wreak havoc with legacy systems but for the people who need it to use 
a power supply with a separate 5V and enough ampage to satisfy their needs. And, 
hey presto! such a thing already exists, namely the above mentioned Zeus.

But noooo, you get all hot and bothered inside and take it upon yourself to 
right this unspeakable evil, starting a crusade against the 'dark force'. To top 
it off you compare your petulant whining to the resistance against a dictatorial 
regime.

'Wir sind das Volk'? Really? As if Dopefer were killing and torturing people who 
don't obey. 


Pathetic. 




________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: "sonicwarrior@gmx.de" <sonicwarrior@gmx.de>
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:45:46
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the 
standard housings

  
Hi,

the chicken/egg problem is discussed at Muffwiggler's, too. I'll just quote 
daverj from the 'some frustration w/ Zeus and POWER' thread:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649

<quote>
The 5 volt power issue being talked about in a couple of other threads is more 
about planning for the future, and maybe changing things for the better. The 
current state of affairs with 5 volts is in a "chicken or the egg" state. 


1 - manufactures who design a module that could use lots of 5 volts, only 
sometimes use the 5 volt bus because the cases today typically have no 5 volts 
or a limited amount of it. 


2 - the case manufacturers don't add large 5 volt supplies because the majority 
of modules don't use the 5 volt bus. 


3 - loop back to #1 

The 5 volt thread is trying to convince people to break the above cycle by 
making large 5 volt supplies standard so that module designers will start using 
the bus more.
</quote>

Btw. the ZEUS power supply from Tip Top Audio already has a dedicated +5V power 
supply, see:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105

The module manufacturers won't change anything until there is a broad on-board 
supply for +5V which means that Doepfer as the Eurorack grandfather has to step 
in or nothing will ever change.

I myself will stop buying any housing until there is a +5V supply in there.
I will also not buy any module with an on-board +5V regulator which draws 
current from the +12V rail without the option of using the +5V rail instead. 
That concretely means I won't buy the A-187-1 and A-189-1 which are on my want 
list until then.

Wir sind das Volk!

Greetings
Joachim

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:38:51 -0800
> Von: James Husted <james.husted@mac.com>
> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the 
>standard housings

> As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that
> requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV converter. Of all the
> manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and Analog Systems are
> the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v
> signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to +5 on the 
module
> so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just
> something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there would use this
> separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital ground>Analog ground a real
> problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it is isolated
> on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do
> convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the supply. More should
> convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very few modules
> that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus - IIRC Scott
> Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his modules and
> nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers all convert over
> to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the
> non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
> -James
> 
> **Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for Synthwerks and have
> to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the +12v supply
> to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I
> have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There seems to be a
> lot of modules that require it.
> 
> 
> James Husted
> Designer, Synthwerks LLC
> www.synthwerks.com
> james@synthwerks.com
> synthwerks@me.com
> 
> 
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:
> 
> > Hello there,
> > 
> > there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
> > the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
> > http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> > 
> > Short summary:
> > 
> > a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard 
> > housings supports +5V
> > b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have a separate 
> > digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board => power 
> > supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
> > 
> > Necessary steps:
> > 
> > For a:
> > 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made Meanwell 
> > T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with 
> > 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other 
> > manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with 
> > +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
> > 
> > For b:
> > 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that one of the 
> > three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other 
> > two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
> > old specification with the downside of more noise which is what happens
> > at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail without a
> > separate digital ground.
> > 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
> > 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the separate digital 
> > ground.
> > 
> > While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a big demand
> > for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections 
> > for modules which use the specification, force the manufactures who are 
> > ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to 
> > connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
> > I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed connector 
> > bus boards.
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Joachim
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! 
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by yahoo@doepfer.de

Though your argumentation is a bit "strange" from my point of view I'll
answer nevertheless:

We had a +5V supply available and you still find it on our website:

www.doepfer.com > PRODUCTS > A-100 > Accessories > A-100NT5

But it is marked "no longer available" as the sales were extremely poor. It
took more than 5 years to sell the first series of these supplies. All A-100
rear panels were equipped with four holes to mount the A-100AD5 (in the
meantime these holes are no longer available in the rear panels) and the
A-100 standard PSU was prepared to connect the A-100NT5.
We could simply "resurrect" the A-100NT5 provided that there are sufficient
inquiries. But apart from this fiendly request nobody was asking for a +5V
supply during the last few months (or even years).
And if you look at our special list (Sonderliste) you will see that we offer
+5V supplies since many months for free to the "Volk" provided that the user
is able to install the supply himself:
www.doepfer.com > SPECIALS > "2-fach-Netzteil, Eingang 230V AC, Ausgang
+5V/2.5A stabilisiert"
(i.e. dual supply, 230 V mains voltage, +5V/2.5A stabilized)

And there is mentioned that it can be used for A-100 too if +5V are
necessary.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von sonicwarrior@gmx.de
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 11:46
> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in
> the standard housings
>
>
> Hi,
>
> the chicken/egg problem is discussed at Muffwiggler's, too. I'll
> just quote daverj from the 'some frustration w/ Zeus and POWER' thread:
> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649
>
> <quote>
> The 5 volt power issue being talked about in a couple of other
> threads is more about planning for the future, and maybe changing
> things for the better. The current state of affairs with 5 volts
> is in a "chicken or the egg" state.
>
> 1 - manufactures who design a module that could use lots of 5
> volts, only sometimes use the 5 volt bus because the cases today
> typically have no 5 volts or a limited amount of it.
>
> 2 - the case manufacturers don't add large 5 volt supplies
> because the majority of modules don't use the 5 volt bus.
>
> 3 - loop back to #1
>
> The 5 volt thread is trying to convince people to break the above
> cycle by making large 5 volt supplies standard so that module
> designers will start using the bus more.
> </quote>
>
> Btw. the ZEUS power supply from Tip Top Audio already has a
> dedicated +5V power supply, see:
> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105
>
> The module manufacturers won't change anything until there is a
> broad on-board supply for +5V which means that Doepfer as the
> Eurorack grandfather has to step in or nothing will ever change.
>
> I myself will stop buying any housing until there is a +5V supply
> in there.
> I will also not buy any module with an on-board +5V regulator
> which draws current from the +12V rail without the option of
> using the +5V rail instead. That concretely means I won't buy the
> A-187-1 and A-189-1 which are on my want list until then.
>
> Wir sind das Volk!
>
> Greetings
> Joachim
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:38:51 -0800
> > Von: James Husted <james.husted@mac.com>
> > An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> > Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power
> supply in the standard housings
>
> > As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that
> > requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV
> converter. Of all the
> > manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and
> Analog Systems are
> > the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v
> > signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to
> +5 on the module
> > so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just
> > something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there
> would use this
> > separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital
> ground>Analog ground a real
> > problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it
> is isolated
> > on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do
> > convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the
> supply. More should
> > convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very
> few modules
> > that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus -
> IIRC Scott
> > Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his
> modules and
> > nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers
> all convert over
> > to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the
> > non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
> > -James
> >
> > **Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for
> Synthwerks and have
> > to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the
> +12v supply
> > to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I
> > have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There
> seems to be a
> > lot of modules that require it.
> >
> >
> > James Husted
> > Designer, Synthwerks LLC
> > www.synthwerks.com
> > james@synthwerks.com
> > synthwerks@me.com
> >
> >
> > On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:
> >
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
> > > the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
> > > http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> > >
> > > Short summary:
> > >
> > > a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard
> > > housings supports +5V
> > > b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have
> a separate
> > > digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board
> => power
> > > supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
> > >
> > > Necessary steps:
> > >
> > > For a:
> > > 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made
> Meanwell
> > > T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with
> > > 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other
> > > manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with
> > > +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
> > >
> > > For b:
> > > 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that
> one of the
> > > three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other
> > > two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
> > > old specification with the downside of more noise which is
> what happens
> > > at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail
> without a
> > > separate digital ground.
> > > 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
> > > 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the
> separate digital
> > > ground.
> > >
> > > While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a
> big demand
> > > for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections
> > > for modules which use the specification, force the
> manufactures who are
> > > ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to
> > > connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
> > > I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed
> connector
> > > bus boards.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Joachim
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
> Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by dancemachine

yes that may have been an odd thread to point to. I find it even odder that
one would create a standard which has been accepted my many other
manufacturers, and then later ditch part if it, leaving the userbase who
have adopted it to fend for themselves.

that said, eurorack is often DIY and now there are many producers of
modules, cases, and accessories, and this maybe the beginning of a true
"standard" that sets itself apart from any one company, and instead is
supported by the global community.  I'm glad I could get a case from a
private craftsman, get some off-the-shelf linear power supplies, power
distro made in my country, and modules from all over the world to create
something far above the sum of it's parts.  (doepfer is a large part of this
system with its excellent a-150 & a-160 series as well as other choice
modules from the a-100 line)

complaints only need to be made towards the eurorack community at large, who
have created the need for this 5vdc supply. I have a hefty 5vdc line in my
system, but there still seems to be a lack of ready-made cases supporting
5vdc.  if doepfer isn't using 5vdc in their modules and doesn't plan to, I
see no reason they should include it in their cases.

if doepfer is drawing power from the 12v rail and regulating it to 5v,
that's another story. one that I can say I do not personally understand.

sent from phone

On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:45 AM, <sonicwarrior@gmx.de>sonicwarrior@gmx.de wrote:



Hi,

the chicken/egg problem is discussed at Muffwiggler's, too. I'll just quote
daverj from the 'some frustration w/ Zeus and POWER' thread:
 <http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649><http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649>
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649

<quote>
The 5 volt power issue being talked about in a couple of other threads is
more about planning for the future, and maybe changing things for the
better. The current state of affairs with 5 volts is in a "chicken or the
egg" state.

1 - manufactures who design a module that could use lots of 5 volts, only
sometimes use the 5 volt bus because the cases today typically have no 5
volts or a limited amount of it.

2 - the case manufacturers don't add large 5 volt supplies because the
majority of modules don't use the 5 volt bus.

3 - loop back to #1

The 5 volt thread is trying to convince people to break the above cycle by
making large 5 volt supplies standard so that module designers will start
using the bus more.
</quote>

Btw. the ZEUS power supply from Tip Top Audio already has a dedicated +5V
power supply, see:
 <http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105><http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105>
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105

The module manufacturers won't change anything until there is a broad
on-board supply for +5V which means that Doepfer as the Eurorack grandfather
has to step in or nothing will ever change.

I myself will stop buying any housing until there is a +5V supply in there.
I will also not buy any module with an on-board +5V regulator which draws
current from the +12V rail without the option of using the +5V rail instead.
That concretely means I won't buy the A-187-1 and A-189-1 which are on my
want list until then.

Wir sind das Volk!

Greetings
Joachim

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:38:51 -0800
> Von: James Husted < <james.husted%40mac.com> <james.husted@mac.com>
james.husted@mac.com>
> An: <Doepfer_a100%40yahoogroups.com> <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com>
Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in
the standard housings

> As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that
> requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV converter. Of all
the
> manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and Analog Systems
are
> the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v
> signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to +5 on the
module
> so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just
> something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there would use this
> separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital ground>Analog ground a
real
> problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it is isolated
> on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do
> convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the supply. More
should
> convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very few modules
> that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus - IIRC Scott
> Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his modules and
> nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers all convert
over
> to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the
> non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
> -James
>
> **Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for Synthwerks and have
> to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the +12v supply
> to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I
> have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There seems to be
a
> lot of modules that require it.
>
>
> James Husted
> Designer, Synthwerks LLC
> <http://www.synthwerks.com> <http://www.synthwerks.com>www.synthwerks.com
> <james%40synthwerks.com> <james@synthwerks.com>james@synthwerks.com
> <synthwerks%40me.com> <synthwerks@me.com>synthwerks@me.com
>
>
> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:
>
> > Hello there,
> >
> > there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
> > the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
> > <http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399><http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399>
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> >
> > Short summary:
> >
> > a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard
> > housings supports +5V
> > b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have a separate
> > digital ground on the whole way (module => cable => bus board => power
> > supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
> >
> > Necessary steps:
> >
> > For a:
> > 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made Meanwell
> > T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with
> > 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other
> > manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with
> > +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
> >
> > For b:
> > 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that one of the
> > three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other
> > two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
> > old specification with the downside of more noise which is what happens
> > at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail without a
> > separate digital ground.
> > 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
> > 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the separate digital
> > ground.
> >
> > While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a big demand
> > for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections
> > for modules which use the specification, force the manufactures who are
> > ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to
> > connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
> > I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed connector
> > bus boards.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Joachim
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

-- 
Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren:
<http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail><http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail>
http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by James Husted

The main Chicken-egg analogy is true. There are really very few modules made that would take advantage of the 5V line if it was there anyway. The only workable solution seems to make beefier +12V supplies to handle the onboard conversion. Or as I mentioned some manufacturers should start converting from the -12v to balance it out. 
Just out of curiosity - What current modules by what makers using the Doepfer-style bus actually require the +5V? 

-James

James Husted
Designer, Synthwerks LLC
www.synthwerks.com
james@synthwerks.com
synthwerks@me.com

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by dancemachine

if I'm not mistaken, the STG sequencing suite in euro runs off only 5V and
GND.  I'm not sure of others...

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Husted <james.husted@mac.com> wrote:

>
>
> The main Chicken-egg analogy is true. There are really very few modules
> made that would take advantage of the 5V line if it was there anyway. The
> only workable solution seems to make beefier +12V supplies to handle the
> onboard conversion. Or as I mentioned some manufacturers should start
> converting from the -12v to balance it out.
> Just out of curiosity - What current modules by what makers using the
> Doepfer-style bus actually require the +5V?
>
> -James
>
>
> James Husted
> Designer, Synthwerks LLC
> www.synthwerks.com
> james@synthwerks.com <james%40synthwerks.com>
> synthwerks@me.com <synthwerks%40me.com>
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-10 by James Husted

Just got off their page on AH and saw that  - interesting. Maybe the trend will change. If we make a module that runs off +5v, I plan on having an onboard regulator plus a jumper/shunt so the user can choose to run it off a bus +5v or +12v converted. It doesn't cost that much for the jumper/shunt.
-James
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On Nov 10, 2010, at 9:24 AM, dancemachine wrote:

> if I'm not mistaken, the STG sequencing suite in euro runs off only 5V and
> GND.  I'm not sure of others...
> 
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:08 PM, James Husted <james.husted@mac.com> wrote:

Re: Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-11 by selfoscillate

> Until the module makers all convert over to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
> -James

this is absolutely true.
i can already hear the "volk" complaining about
the additional costs for such a 5 volts supply,
especially when they don't need it for their
module configuration.

best wishes

ingo

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-11 by Joachim

Hello,

I can tell you why the sales on the +5V supply was poor:

1. Not everyone wants to DIY.
2. Many people are afraid to DIY with power supply stuff.
3. Years ago there were not that many digital modules.
4. DIY people tend to buy from elsewhere anyway.

If you plan to abandon the +5V you should at least act consistent:

1. Change the graphic
http://www.doepfer.de/a100_man/a100t_3.gif
and add an 'obsolete' to the +5V rail.
2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.

Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL 
060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no 
one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.

Cheers
Joachim

Am 10.11.2010 15:43, schrieb yahoo@doepfer.de:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Though your argumentation is a bit "strange" from my point of view I'll
> answer nevertheless:
>
> We had a +5V supply available and you still find it on our website:
>
> www.doepfer.com>  PRODUCTS>  A-100>  Accessories>  A-100NT5
>
> But it is marked "no longer available" as the sales were extremely poor. It
> took more than 5 years to sell the first series of these supplies. All A-100
> rear panels were equipped with four holes to mount the A-100AD5 (in the
> meantime these holes are no longer available in the rear panels) and the
> A-100 standard PSU was prepared to connect the A-100NT5.
> We could simply "resurrect" the A-100NT5 provided that there are sufficient
> inquiries. But apart from this fiendly request nobody was asking for a +5V
> supply during the last few months (or even years).
> And if you look at our special list (Sonderliste) you will see that we offer
> +5V supplies since many months for free to the "Volk" provided that the user
> is able to install the supply himself:
> www.doepfer.com>  SPECIALS>  "2-fach-Netzteil, Eingang 230V AC, Ausgang
> +5V/2.5A stabilisiert"
> (i.e. dual supply, 230 V mains voltage, +5V/2.5A stabilized)
>
> And there is mentioned that it can be used for A-100 too if +5V are
> necessary.
>
> Best wishes
> Dieter Doepfer
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com]Im Auftrag von sonicwarrior@gmx.de
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2010 11:46
>> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in
>> the standard housings
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the chicken/egg problem is discussed at Muffwiggler's, too. I'll
>> just quote daverj from the 'some frustration w/ Zeus and POWER' thread:
>> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=327649#327649
>>
>> <quote>
>> The 5 volt power issue being talked about in a couple of other
>> threads is more about planning for the future, and maybe changing
>> things for the better. The current state of affairs with 5 volts
>> is in a "chicken or the egg" state.
>>
>> 1 - manufactures who design a module that could use lots of 5
>> volts, only sometimes use the 5 volt bus because the cases today
>> typically have no 5 volts or a limited amount of it.
>>
>> 2 - the case manufacturers don't add large 5 volt supplies
>> because the majority of modules don't use the 5 volt bus.
>>
>> 3 - loop back to #1
>>
>> The 5 volt thread is trying to convince people to break the above
>> cycle by making large 5 volt supplies standard so that module
>> designers will start using the bus more.
>> </quote>
>>
>> Btw. the ZEUS power supply from Tip Top Audio already has a
>> dedicated +5V power supply, see:
>> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23105
>>
>> The module manufacturers won't change anything until there is a
>> broad on-board supply for +5V which means that Doepfer as the
>> Eurorack grandfather has to step in or nothing will ever change.
>>
>> I myself will stop buying any housing until there is a +5V supply
>> in there.
>> I will also not buy any module with an on-board +5V regulator
>> which draws current from the +12V rail without the option of
>> using the +5V rail instead. That concretely means I won't buy the
>> A-187-1 and A-189-1 which are on my want list until then.
>>
>> Wir sind das Volk!
>>
>> Greetings
>> Joachim
>>
>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>> Datum: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:38:51 -0800
>>> Von: James Husted<james.husted@mac.com>
>>> An: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
>>> Betreff: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power
>> supply in the standard housings
>>
>>> As far as I know there is only one module in the Doepfer lineup that
>>> requires a separate +5V supply and that is the MIDI>CV
>> converter. Of all the
>>> manufacturers out there I think that Analogue Solutions and
>> Analog Systems are
>>> the only companies in the eurorack format that require a separate +5v
>>> signal - all the digital modules I know of convert the +12V to
>> +5 on the module
>>> so the "not supporting the +5V rail" is a industry trend and not just
>>> something Doepfer is doing. What Digital modules out there
>> would use this
>>> separate +5V line if there was one? Is the Digital
>> ground>Analog ground a real
>>> problem on the modules that do convert it onboard. I assume it
>> is isolated
>>> on them. I think the major problem is that the digital modules that do
>>> convert the +12v make an extra load for that side of the
>> supply. More should
>>> convert from the -12v supply to balance it out. There are very
>> few modules
>>> that even offer an option to choose to use the +5v supply bus -
>> IIRC Scott
>>> Harvestman said he once offered a jumper option on one of his
>> modules and
>>> nobody used it so he discontinued it. Until the module makers
>> all convert over
>>> to using the +5v bus there is no reason to burden the rest of the
>>> non-digital users with the expense of a separate supply.
>>> -James
>>>
>>> **Disclaimer** As you can see from my sig I design for
>> Synthwerks and have
>>> to disclose that we make a module (the PC5V) that converts the
>> +12v supply
>>> to +5v and pipes it to the bus (and front panel with a level control. I
>>> have to admit it is not a big seller for these reasons. There
>> seems to be a
>>> lot of modules that require it.
>>>
>>>
>>> James Husted
>>> Designer, Synthwerks LLC
>>> www.synthwerks.com
>>> james@synthwerks.com
>>> synthwerks@me.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello there,
>>>>
>>>> there is currently a lot of talk going on about Doepfer not supporting
>>>> the +5V rail with the standard housings. Here is the thread:
>>>> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
>>>>
>>>> Short summary:
>>>>
>>>> a. There is definitely a demand that the power supply in the standard
>>>> housings supports +5V
>>>> b. +5V is used for digital modules and therefore should have
>> a separate
>>>> digital ground on the whole way (module =>  cable =>  bus board
>> =>  power
>>>> supply) to avoid digital noise coming over the common ground.
>>>>
>>>> Necessary steps:
>>>>
>>>> For a:
>>>> 1. Using either tri output power supplies like the ready-made
>> Meanwell
>>>> T-60C or an additional 5V power supply, e.g. the Meanwell S-25-5 with
>>>> 5,0A of +5V. Meanwell is just an example, there are several other
>>>> manufacturers like Power One and a current transformer with
>>>> +5V/+12V/-12V outputs could be used, too, of course.
>>>>
>>>> For b:
>>>> 2. Change the specification for the power connection so that
>> one of the
>>>> three ground lines is reserved for the digital ground while the other
>>>> two remain for the analog ground. It would still be compatible to the
>>>> old specification with the downside of more noise which is
>> what happens
>>>> at the moment anyway when the +5V is taken from the +12V rail
>> without a
>>>> separate digital ground.
>>>> 3. Change the bus boards to implement the separate digital ground.
>>>> 4. Change the existing +5V modules to make use of the
>> separate digital
>>>> ground.
>>>>
>>>> While we are at the subject of a bus board change: There is a
>> big demand
>>>> for keyed connectors, too. They would help to avoid wrong connections
>>>> for modules which use the specification, force the
>> manufactures who are
>>>> ignoring the key position specification to support it and help to
>>>> connect the modules which is currently a pain in the a**.
>>>> I myself would gladly pay the slightly higher price for keyed
>> connector
>>>> bus boards.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Joachim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
>> Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-12 by Florian Anwander

Hi Joachim

> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a 
separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of 
thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the 
same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or 
the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws 
of nature ;)

> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL 
> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no 
> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group. 
Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult 
the web-archive of the mail list.

Florian

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-12 by Joachim

Hi Florian,

 > It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
 > separate rail

It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of 
current.

 > The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
 > Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
 > the web-archive of the mail list.

If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P

Joachim

Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hi Joachim
>
>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
> of nature ;)
>
>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
> the web-archive of the mail list.
>
> Florian
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-14 by achtung_999

I find this threat rather strange.
Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
standard.
Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
Typical..

just my 2 cents.





On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim <sonicwarrior@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi Florian,
>
>  > It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>  > separate rail
>
> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
> current.
>
>  > The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>  > Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>  > the web-archive of the mail list.
>
> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
>
> Joachim
>
> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
> > Hi Joachim
> >
> >> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
> > It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
> > separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
> > thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
> > same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
> > the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
> > of nature ;)
> >
> >> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
> >> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
> >> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
> > The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
> > Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
> > the web-archive of the mail list.
> >
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-14 by Joachim

A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!

Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to 
explain it in german:

Es geht darum,
- dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht 
hat und diesen selber zunächst nur halbherzig unterstützt hat 
(Selbstbaulösungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V 
Unterstützung), was dazu führte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V 
Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
- dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie 
ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann, 
schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum 
Versagen von Netzteilen geführt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf 
der Doepfer Netzteile.

Dabei wäre es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V 
Linie zu unterstützen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile 
(switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern + 
Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind günstiger, haben aber gerade im 
Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen 
schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im hörbaren Bereich und können 
einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes 
Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem für seinen guten Sound bekannt.
Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas 
teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben 
+/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
Der Aufpreis dafür ist vernachlässigbar.

Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
interessiert sich für die Störgeräusche, die von digitalen Modulen 
kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module 
benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zunächst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und 
eine digitale Masse einzuführen. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde 
bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In späteren Postings wurde dort aber auf 
Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner für die Flachbandkabel 
und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufstoßen müssten.

Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere 
Möglichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und 
sogar erwähnte die +5V Linie komplett abzusägen, indem zukünftig keine
Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterstützen sollen.

Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare Lösung 
darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent stärker ausgeführt 
wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterstützt werden.

Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem 
Problem nichts, was aber nicht heißt, dass es nicht da ist.
Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr möglich ist, im Bereich
der digitalen Module aber riesige Möglichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als gäbe es kein 
Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.



Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> I find this threat rather strange.
> Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
> standard.
> Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
> Typical..
>
> just my 2 cents.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de>  wrote:
>
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>>   >  It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>   >  separate rail
>>
>> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
>> current.
>>
>>   >  The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>   >  Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>   >  the web-archive of the mail list.
>>
>> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
>>
>> Joachim
>>
>> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>>> Hi Joachim
>>>
>>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
>>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
>>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
>>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
>>> of nature ;)
>>>
>>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
>>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
>>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>
>>> Florian
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-14 by Guy Drieghe D.

Joachim,

I don't understand your reasoning behind the "5V pulling its power
off of the12V rail". Sure it does so, but it's irrelevant because if it
wouldn't have been a 5V module, it would've taken its power just
the same off the 12V rail... probably even more.

As for the switched supplies: we're not in the 70/80-ties anymore.
Today, switched supplies are at least as good, if not better, than
linear supplies, even for audio. Only, they're a fraction of the price,
and a fraction of the weight & bulk. And if one would still have
high-frequencies and/or noise on the rails, then there are at least 
three different (or combined) methods of getting rid of those. 
Easy to do.

Also, there is not really a need to have separate rails for digital
and analog, at least not in our (very simple) kind of electronics.
The only problems one might encounter (interference), are either 
current pullers like LED's, or fast & spikey triggers. This is the reason
why some manuf's use a separate ground rail for LED stuff.
The easiest way to solve that problem (if at all), is simply using
two separate ground rails, which go back to the supply. If there
would be one "dirty" (or digital) module interfering with the regular
rail, then hooking it up to a 2nd ground rail would simply take that
misery back to the supply, which then takes care of the problem.

The whole "problem" <cough> with the missing 5V rail, is very
easily and most elegantly solved by having the regulator on board
of the module's PCB. This is not only the proper way to do this, but
it also allows for having other voltages easily available, something
which is not possible with a fixed 5V rail.

My 1.9 cnts.


_g
Show quoted textHide quoted text
On 14 Nov 2010, at 15:20, Joachim wrote:

> 
> A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!
> 
> Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to 
> explain it in german:
> 
> Es geht darum,
> - dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht 
> hat und diesen selber zunächst nur halbherzig unterstützt hat 
> (Selbstbaulösungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V 
> Unterstützung), was dazu führte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V 
> Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
> - dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie 
> ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann, 
> schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum 
> Versagen von Netzteilen geführt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf 
> der Doepfer Netzteile.
> 
> Dabei wäre es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V 
> Linie zu unterstützen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
> Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile 
> (switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern + 
> Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind günstiger, haben aber gerade im 
> Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen 
> schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im hörbaren Bereich und können 
> einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes 
> Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem für seinen guten Sound bekannt.
> Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas 
> teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben 
> +/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
> Der Aufpreis dafür ist vernachlässigbar.
> 
> Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
> interessiert sich für die Störgeräusche, die von digitalen Modulen 
> kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module 
> benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zunächst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und 
> eine digitale Masse einzuführen. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde 
> bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In späteren Postings wurde dort aber auf 
> Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
> Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner für die Flachbandkabel 
> und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufstoßen müssten.
> 
> Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere 
> Möglichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und 
> sogar erwähnte die +5V Linie komplett abzusägen, indem zukünftig keine
> Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterstützen sollen.
> 
> Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare Lösung 
> darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent stärker ausgeführt 
> wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterstützt werden.
> 
> Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem 
> Problem nichts, was aber nicht heißt, dass es nicht da ist.
> Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr möglich ist, im Bereich
> der digitalen Module aber riesige Möglichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
> in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
> Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als gäbe es kein 
> Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.
> 
> Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
> > I find this threat rather strange.
> > Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
> > standard.
> > Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
> > Typical..
> >
> > just my 2 cents.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Florian,
> >>
> >> > It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
> >> > separate rail
> >>
> >> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
> >> current.
> >>
> >> > The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
> >> > Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
> >> > the web-archive of the mail list.
> >>
> >> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
> >>
> >> Joachim
> >>
> >> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
> >>> Hi Joachim
> >>>
> >>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
> >>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
> >>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
> >>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
> >>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
> >>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
> >>> of nature ;)
> >>>
> >>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
> >>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
> >>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
> >>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
> >>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
> >>> the web-archive of the mail list.
> >>>
> >>> Florian
> >>>
> >>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-14 by Joachim

> I don't understand your reasoning behind the "5V pulling its power
 > off of the12V rail". Sure it does so, but it's irrelevant because if it
 > wouldn't have been a 5V module, it would've taken its power just
 > the same off the 12V rail... probably even more.

Digital modules tend to pull more than analog ones especially when using 
a display: Doepfer A-187-1 => 200 mA

Imagine it this way:

You have still mineral water (+12V) and sparkling mineral water (+5V).
At first no one wanted the sparkling water so you put it deep into the
basement. Then someone wants sparkling water and instead of getting the
the stock out of the basement you use a machine to make
sparkling from still mineral water (5V regulator pulling from 12V).
Of course then your stock of still mineral water gets consumed earlier
as if you had taken the stock of sparkling water from the basement.
I am just the one telling you it would be smarter to use the stock
sparkling water and by now everyone here is telling me that no one is 
willing to take the few steps down to get it. And I don't have and don't
get the key for the basement.


Am 14.11.2010 15:45, schrieb Guy Drieghe D.:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Joachim,
>
> I don't understand your reasoning behind the "5V pulling its power
> off of the12V rail". Sure it does so, but it's irrelevant because if it
> wouldn't have been a 5V module, it would've taken its power just
> the same off the 12V rail... probably even more.
>
> As for the switched supplies: we're not in the 70/80-ties anymore.
> Today, switched supplies are at least as good, if not better, than
> linear supplies, even for audio. Only, they're a fraction of the price,
> and a fraction of the weight&  bulk. And if one would still have
> high-frequencies and/or noise on the rails, then there are at least
> three different (or combined) methods of getting rid of those.
> Easy to do.
>
> Also, there is not really a need to have separate rails for digital
> and analog, at least not in our (very simple) kind of electronics.
> The only problems one might encounter (interference), are either
> current pullers like LED's, or fast&  spikey triggers. This is the reason
> why some manuf's use a separate ground rail for LED stuff.
> The easiest way to solve that problem (if at all), is simply using
> two separate ground rails, which go back to the supply. If there
> would be one "dirty" (or digital) module interfering with the regular
> rail, then hooking it up to a 2nd ground rail would simply take that
> misery back to the supply, which then takes care of the problem.
>
> The whole "problem"<cough>  with the missing 5V rail, is very
> easily and most elegantly solved by having the regulator on board
> of the module's PCB. This is not only the proper way to do this, but
> it also allows for having other voltages easily available, something
> which is not possible with a fixed 5V rail.
>
> My 1.9 cnts.
>
>
> _g
>
>
> On 14 Nov 2010, at 15:20, Joachim wrote:
>
>>
>> A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!
>>
>> Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to
>> explain it in german:
>>
>> Es geht darum,
>> - dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht
>> hat und diesen selber zunächst nur halbherzig unterstützt hat
>> (Selbstbaulösungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V
>> Unterstützung), was dazu führte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V
>> Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
>> - dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie
>> ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann,
>> schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum
>> Versagen von Netzteilen geführt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf
>> der Doepfer Netzteile.
>>
>> Dabei wäre es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V
>> Linie zu unterstützen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
>> Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile
>> (switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern +
>> Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind günstiger, haben aber gerade im
>> Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen
>> schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im hörbaren Bereich und können
>> einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes
>> Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem für seinen guten Sound bekannt.
>> Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas
>> teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben
>> +/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
>> Der Aufpreis dafür ist vernachlässigbar.
>>
>> Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
>> interessiert sich für die Störgeräusche, die von digitalen Modulen
>> kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module
>> benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zunächst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und
>> eine digitale Masse einzuführen. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde
>> bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In späteren Postings wurde dort aber auf
>> Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
>> Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner für die Flachbandkabel
>> und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufstoßen müssten.
>>
>> Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere
>> Möglichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und
>> sogar erwähnte die +5V Linie komplett abzusägen, indem zukünftig keine
>> Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterstützen sollen.
>>
>> Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare Lösung
>> darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent stärker ausgeführt
>> wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterstützt werden.
>>
>> Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem
>> Problem nichts, was aber nicht heißt, dass es nicht da ist.
>> Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr möglich ist, im Bereich
>> der digitalen Module aber riesige Möglichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
>> in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
>> Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als gäbe es kein
>> Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.
>>
>> Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
>>> I find this threat rather strange.
>>> Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
>>> standard.
>>> Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
>>> Typical..
>>>
>>> just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Florian,
>>>>
>>>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>>> separate rail
>>>>
>>>> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
>>>> current.
>>>>
>>>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>>
>>>> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
>>>>
>>>> Joachim
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>>>>> Hi Joachim
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
>>>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
>>>>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
>>>>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
>>>>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
>>>>> of nature ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
>>>>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
>>>>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
>>>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Just a bit of synth fun.

2010-11-14 by James G Watt

Just messing around with doepfer theremin controllers and a pong machine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTpl2e2XLmQ
sorry if it's off topic but I thought some may find it entertaining.

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-14 by Florian Anwander

Hello Joachim,

if you think there is a that big necessity and a that big possibilty to 
do a successful business with it, then GET ON AND DO IT. But don't blame 
others to do so.


Florian

Joachim wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!
>
> Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to
> explain it in german:
>
> Es geht darum,
> - dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht
> hat und diesen selber zunächst nur halbherzig unterstützt hat
> (Selbstbaulösungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V
> Unterstützung), was dazu führte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V
> Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
> - dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie
> ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann,
> schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum
> Versagen von Netzteilen geführt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf
> der Doepfer Netzteile.
>
> Dabei wäre es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V
> Linie zu unterstützen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
> Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile
> (switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern +
> Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind günstiger, haben aber gerade im
> Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen
> schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im hörbaren Bereich und können
> einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes
> Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem für seinen guten Sound bekannt.
> Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas
> teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben
> +/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
> Der Aufpreis dafür ist vernachlässigbar.
>
> Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
> interessiert sich für die Störgeräusche, die von digitalen Modulen
> kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module
> benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zunächst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und
> eine digitale Masse einzuführen. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde
> bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In späteren Postings wurde dort aber auf
> Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
> Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner für die Flachbandkabel
> und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufstoßen müssten.
>
> Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere
> Möglichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und
> sogar erwähnte die +5V Linie komplett abzusägen, indem zukünftig keine
> Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterstützen sollen.
>
> Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare Lösung
> darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent stärker ausgeführt
> wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterstützt werden.
>
> Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem
> Problem nichts, was aber nicht heißt, dass es nicht da ist.
> Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr möglich ist, im Bereich
> der digitalen Module aber riesige Möglichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
> in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
> Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als gäbe es kein
> Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.
>
>
>
> Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
>> I find this threat rather strange.
>> Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
>> standard.
>> Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
>> Typical..
>>
>> just my 2 cents.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de>   wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Florian,
>>>
>>>    >   It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>    >   separate rail
>>>
>>> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
>>> current.
>>>
>>>    >   The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>    >   Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>    >   the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>
>>> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
>>>
>>> Joachim
>>>
>>> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>>>> Hi Joachim
>>>>
>>>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
>>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
>>>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
>>>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
>>>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
>>>> of nature ;)
>>>>
>>>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
>>>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
>>>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
>>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>>
>>>> Florian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

AW: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-15 by yahoo@doepfer.de

You find my comments written inline.

Dieter Doepfer


> Hello,
>
> I can tell you why the sales on the +5V supply was poor:
>
> 1. Not everyone wants to DIY.
> 2. Many people are afraid to DIY with power supply stuff.
> 3. Years ago there were not that many digital modules.
> 4. DIY people tend to buy from elsewhere anyway.

The +5V supply A-100NT5 was not DIY but a regular product. All A-100 cases
could be ordered with or without the +5V supply. Only for the belated
installation of the A-100NT5 some electronic experience was recommended
because of the mains wiring (no soldering was necessary, only installation
of some connections and mechanical mounting).

> If you plan to abandon the +5V you should at least act consistent:
>
> 1. Change the graphic
> http://www.doepfer.de/a100_man/a100t_3.gif
> and add an 'obsolete' to the +5V rail.

We will not change the A-100 bus layout because it's possible to add +5V,
e.g. by means the A-100AD5 or the (obsolete) A-100NT5 or any other +5V
supply. The +5V rail is an option as well as the CV and Gate rails which
have not be used unconditionally.

> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
>
> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.

We tried to change the supply to switching supplies because it would be much
easier for us not to distinguish between 230V and 115% cases. We did not
find one that was sufficient quality. The main problems were interferences
and unsufficient voltage stability while the load changes (e.g. if many LEDs
turn on/off simultaneously). You find some of these switching supplies on
our special list because we decided not to use them in the A-100 cases.

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by Joachim

Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your 
mother tongue)

There is no sense in an optional +5V rail as nobody will use it. Which
is what is happening at the moment. There are only two options in the 
long term: Abandoning or supporting. How hard is it to get that?

Anyway I think I posted the wrong Muffwiggler thread, the right one
is this:
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
(Eurorack Power Problems: What's it gunna take?)

I also started a poll at Muffs as I only got contrary wind on this list 
(maybe because I'm no sales person and tried a totally wrong sale strategy):
http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24935
(Eurorack and the neglected +5V rail)

Joachim

Am 14.11.2010 22:03, schrieb Florian Anwander:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Hello Joachim,
>
> if you think there is a that big necessity and a that big possibilty to
> do a successful business with it, then GET ON AND DO IT. But don't blame
> others to do so.
>
>
> Florian
>
> Joachim wrote:
>>
>> A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!
>>
>> Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to
>> explain it in german:
>>
>> Es geht darum,
>> - dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht
>> hat und diesen selber zunächst nur halbherzig unterstützt hat
>> (Selbstbaulösungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V
>> Unterstützung), was dazu führte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V
>> Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
>> - dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie
>> ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann,
>> schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum
>> Versagen von Netzteilen geführt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf
>> der Doepfer Netzteile.
>>
>> Dabei wäre es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V
>> Linie zu unterstützen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
>> Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile
>> (switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern +
>> Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind günstiger, haben aber gerade im
>> Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen
>> schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im hörbaren Bereich und können
>> einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes
>> Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem für seinen guten Sound bekannt.
>> Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas
>> teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben
>> +/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
>> Der Aufpreis dafür ist vernachlässigbar.
>>
>> Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
>> interessiert sich für die Störgeräusche, die von digitalen Modulen
>> kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module
>> benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zunächst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und
>> eine digitale Masse einzuführen. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde
>> bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In späteren Postings wurde dort aber auf
>> Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
>> Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner für die Flachbandkabel
>> und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufstoßen müssten.
>>
>> Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere
>> Möglichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und
>> sogar erwähnte die +5V Linie komplett abzusägen, indem zukünftig keine
>> Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterstützen sollen.
>>
>> Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare Lösung
>> darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent stärker ausgeführt
>> wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterstützt werden.
>>
>> Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem
>> Problem nichts, was aber nicht heißt, dass es nicht da ist.
>> Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr möglich ist, im Bereich
>> der digitalen Module aber riesige Möglichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
>> in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
>> Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als gäbe es kein
>> Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
>>> I find this threat rather strange.
>>> Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
>>> standard.
>>> Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
>>> Typical..
>>>
>>> just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de>    wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Florian,
>>>>
>>>>     >    It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>>     >    separate rail
>>>>
>>>> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level of
>>>> current.
>>>>
>>>>     >    The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>>     >    Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>>     >    the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>>
>>>> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course! :P
>>>>
>>>> Joachim
>>>>
>>>> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>>>>> Hi Joachim
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
>>>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power via a
>>>>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
>>>>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
>>>>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
>>>>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the laws
>>>>> of nature ;)
>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco TXL
>>>>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper. Then no
>>>>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
>>>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this group.
>>>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please consult
>>>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by dancemachine

i think muffs represents a better section of eurorack users at large, who
might be willing to use and support the 5V line.  this list is kinda closed
off to everything except doepfer systems (hence the name) which at this
point is only 1 (large) portion of what has become the modular format in
this era.

2010/11/18 Joachim <sonicwarrior@gmx.de>

>
>
>
> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your
> mother tongue)
>
> There is no sense in an optional +5V rail as nobody will use it. Which
> is what is happening at the moment. There are only two options in the
> long term: Abandoning or supporting. How hard is it to get that?
>
> Anyway I think I posted the wrong Muffwiggler thread, the right one
> is this:
>
> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24399
> (Eurorack Power Problems: What's it gunna take?)
>
> I also started a poll at Muffs as I only got contrary wind on this list
> (maybe because I'm no sales person and tried a totally wrong sale
> strategy):
> http://www.muffwiggler.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24935
> (Eurorack and the neglected +5V rail)
>
> Joachim
>
> Am 14.11.2010 22:03, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>
> > Hello Joachim,
> >
> > if you think there is a that big necessity and a that big possibilty to
> > do a successful business with it, then GET ON AND DO IT. But don't blame
> > others to do so.
> >
> >
> > Florian
> >
> > Joachim wrote:
> >>
> >> A reminder: Doepfer himself designed the +5V rail he is abandoning now!
> >>
> >> Anyway you don't seem to understand the reasons behind it. I'll try to
> >> explain it in german:
> >>
> >> Es geht darum,
> >> - dass Doepfer einen Standard mit +5V Linie auf Flachkabel/Bus erdacht
> >> hat und diesen selber zun�chst nur halbherzig unterst�tzt hat
> >> (Selbstbaul�sungen, +5V Konverter zum aufstecken, keine direkte +5V
> >> Unterst�tzung), was dazu f�hrte, dass dann letztlich Module mit +5V
> >> Konverter auf der Platine heraus kamen, statt die +5V Linie zu benutzen.
> >> - dass +5V Konverter auf der Platine selber den Strom aus der +12V Linie
> >> ziehen, dadurch sind die 1200 ma, welche die +12V Linie liefern kann,
> >> schneller verbraucht. Bei Muffwigglers berichteten einige, dass dies zum
> >> Versagen von Netzteilen gef�hrt hat und damit zu einem schlechten Ruf
> >> der Doepfer Netzteile.
> >>
> >> Dabei w�re es mit Dreifach-Ausgangs-Netzteilen sehr einfach die +5V
> >> Linie zu unterst�tzen, Beispiele hatte ich geliefert.
> >> Es gibt Netzteile mit Dreifach-Ausgang sowohl als Schaltnetzteile
> >> (switching power supplies), als auch mit linearen Spannungsreglern +
> >> Trafo. Schaltnetzteile sind g�nstiger, haben aber gerade im
> >> Audio-Bereich wegen der Artefakte (Noise) durch die Taktung einen
> >> schlechten Ruf. Dabei liegen die nicht im h�rbaren Bereich und k�nnen
> >> einfach ausgefiltert werden. Der Spectralis hat auch ein eingebautes
> >> Schaltnetzteil und ist trotzdem f�r seinen guten Sound bekannt.
> >> Darum geht aber auch gar nicht, es gibt die Teile ja auch in etwas
> >> teurer im Linear-Format oder man nimmt einfach einen Trafo, der neben
> >> +/- 12V auch +5V liefert und setzt noch einen 7805 auf die Platine.
> >> Der Aufpreis daf�r ist vernachl�ssigbar.
> >>
> >> Sehr witzig finde ich den Aufschrei gegen Schaltnetzteile, aber keiner
> >> interessiert sich f�r die St�rger�usche, die von digitalen Modulen
> >> kommen, weil Sie aktuell dieselbe Masse wie die analogen Module
> >> benutzen. Dazu hatte ich zun�chst den Vorschlag gemacht eine analoge und
> >> eine digitale Masse einzuf�hren. Das stammt nicht von mir, sonder wurde
> >> bei Muffwigglers vorgeschlagen. In sp�teren Postings wurde dort aber auf
> >> Probleme hingewiesen, falls ein Modul analoge und digitale Teile hat.
> >> Mal abgesehen davon interessiert sich auch keiner f�r die Flachbandkabel
> >> und andere Dingen, die Audiophilen dann eigentlich auch aufsto�en
> m�ssten.
> >>
> >> Der Boykottaufruf kam mir nur in den Sinn, da ich keine andere
> >> M�glichkeit sehe, nachdem Doepfer ja kein Interesse gezeigt hat und
> >> sogar erw�hnte die +5V Linie komplett abzus�gen, indem zuk�nftig keine
> >> Doepfer-Module diese mehr unterst�tzen sollen.
> >>
> >> Es geht also darum, dass der aktuelle Zustand eine halbgare L�sung
> >> darstellt und entweder die +12V Linie dann konsequent st�rker ausgef�hrt
> >> wird oder eben die +5V endlich mal richtig unterst�tzt werden.
> >>
> >> Wenn man keine oder nur wenige digitale Module hat, merkt man von dem
> >> Problem nichts, was aber nicht hei�t, dass es nicht da ist.
> >> Und da im Analogbereich nicht viel Neues mehr m�glich ist, im Bereich
> >> der digitalen Module aber riesige M�glichkeiten liegen, wird das Problem
> >> in Zukunft deutlich relevanter werden.
> >> Entweder man bereitet sich darauf vor oder tut so als g�be es kein
> >> Problem und steckt den Kopf in den Sand.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 14.11.2010 14:01, schrieb achtung_999:
> >>> I find this threat rather strange.
> >>> Doepfer started building the Eurorack system, other people adopted the
> >>> standard.
> >>> Now there is money in there they start bitchin..
> >>> Typical..
> >>>
> >>> just my 2 cents.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de<sonicwarrior%40gmx.de>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Florian,
> >>>>
> >>>> > It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power
> via a
> >>>> > separate rail
> >>>>
> >>>> It matters because every power supply can handle only a maximum level
> of
> >>>> current.
> >>>>
> >>>> > The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this
> group.
> >>>> > Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please
> consult
> >>>> > the web-archive of the mail list.
> >>>>
> >>>> If there has been a final result it cannot be questioned, of course!
> :P
> >>>>
> >>>> Joachim
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 12.11.2010 10:33, schrieb Florian Anwander:
> >>>>> Hi Joachim
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. Pump up the +12V to handle the additional current.
> >>>>> It does not matter whether the 5V supply eats from the total power
> via a
> >>>>> separate rail or from the +12V rail. 2nd main sentence of
> >>>>> thermodynamcis: "the sum of all energy in a systems stays always the
> >>>>> same". You may be able to change capitalism or the catholic church or
> >>>>> the behaviour of a small synth producer - but you cannot change the
> laws
> >>>>> of nature ;)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Btw. if you would use something like the Meanwell T60B or the Taco
> TXL
> >>>>>> 060-0522TI you could have +5V AND make the power supply cheaper.
> Then no
> >>>>>> one would complain to pay more for the +5V supply.
> >>>>> The usage of switching power supplies was often discussed in this
> group.
> >>>>> Final result: it cannot be recommended. For more details please
> consult
> >>>>> the web-archive of the mail list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Florian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by Florian Anwander

Joachim wrote:
>
> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your
> mother tongue)
You are not talking, chinese, but you are talking too much. As you were 
not able to read between my lines, now read it in plain ascii and in 
your tounge: "Wenn Du rumquengeln willst, dann geh in den Kindergarten, 
aber verschone uns hier." Ou plus court mais trop clair: "ta geule!"

Florian

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by Joachim

You should learn to ignore people if you find them annoying.

... and sometimes you should get off your high horse.
You're making mistakes and talking bullshit, too, sometimes.


Am 18.11.2010 22:45, schrieb Florian Anwander:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your
>> mother tongue)
> You are not talking, chinese, but you are talking too much. As you were
> not able to read between my lines, now read it in plain ascii and in
> your tounge: "Wenn Du rumquengeln willst, dann geh in den Kindergarten,
> aber verschone uns hier." Ou plus court mais trop clair: "ta geule!"
>
> Florian
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by york luethje

Yeah, but Florian doesn't throw a temper tantrum if he doesn't immediately gets 
what he wants.

On muff you complain that people on this list didn't get behind your suggestion 
but that wasn't surprising in the least. In your second post on this subject you 
started accusing Dopefer of some nefarious plot to deprive the community of the 
magic 5V rail, urging boycotts and revolution. What on earth did you expect?

Ultimately, it's something the market will decide. If manufacturers see a 
business opening, they will try to fill it. If Doepfer don't feel it's worth 
their while - great. Let others do it. Untold riches await them. 






________________________________
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: Joachim <sonicwarrior@gmx.de>
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 17:02:02
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the 
standard housings

  
You should learn to ignore people if you find them annoying.

... and sometimes you should get off your high horse.
You're making mistakes and talking bullshit, too, sometimes.

Am 18.11.2010 22:45, schrieb Florian Anwander:
> Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your
>> mother tongue)
> You are not talking, chinese, but you are talking too much. As you were
> not able to read between my lines, now read it in plain ascii and in
> your tounge: "Wenn Du rumquengeln willst, dann geh in den Kindergarten,
> aber verschone uns hier." Ou plus court mais trop clair: "ta geule!"
>
> Florian
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings

2010-11-18 by Bakis Sirros

ok, now i think we had enough of that subject.
let's talk about something else which would be more useful to the Doepfer users community... ok?

thanks,
Bakis.

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds / Interconnected / Memory Geist

[Doepfer_a100] group owner

www. parallel - worlds - music. com

www. myspace. com/ parallelworldsmusic

www. myspace. com/ interconnectedmusic

www. myspace. com/ memorygeist

www. DiN. org. uk

www. musicamaximamagnetica. com

www. vu-us. com

--- On Fri, 11/19/10, york luethje <ybl@yahoo.com> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: york luethje <ybl@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the standard housings
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 19, 2010, 12:34 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      Yeah, but Florian doesn't throw a temper tantrum if he doesn't immediately gets 

what he wants.



On muff you complain that people on this list didn't get behind your suggestion 

but that wasn't surprising in the least. In your second post on this subject you 

started accusing Dopefer of some nefarious plot to deprive the community of the 

magic 5V rail, urging boycotts and revolution. What on earth did you expect?



Ultimately, it's something the market will decide. If manufacturers see a 

business opening, they will try to fill it. If Doepfer don't feel it's worth 

their while - great. Let others do it. Untold riches await them. 



________________________________

From: Joachim <sonicwarrior@gmx.de>

To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 17:02:02

Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the 

standard housings



You should learn to ignore people if you find them annoying.



... and sometimes you should get off your high horse.

You're making mistakes and talking bullshit, too, sometimes.



Am 18.11.2010 22:45, schrieb Florian Anwander:

> Joachim wrote:

>>

>> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your

>> mother tongue)

> You are not talking, chinese, but you are talking too much. As you were

> not able to read between my lines, now read it in plain ascii and in

> your tounge: "Wenn Du rumquengeln willst, dann geh in den Kindergarten,

> aber verschone uns hier." Ou plus court mais trop clair: "ta geule!"

>

> Florian

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> Yahoo! Groups Links

>

>

>

>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





    
     

    
    


 



  






      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Doepfer_a100] Humor on this list and personal dislikes vs. subjects

2010-11-19 by Joachim

> What on earth did you expect?

I definitely didn't expect that everyone takes my post that serious.
Is there no sense of humor in this list?

I also expected that people here are able to differ between personal 
dislikes and subjects. It's not exactly clever to dislike my style and 
dismiss my suggestions because of that and not because of the subject 
itself.
You can always say 'I got your point but I don't like your style' if you
fear that someone thinks you'll approve my bad bad style if you don't 
make that clear.
In my view that is what grown-ups should do instead of pointing at the 
other one. The latter effectively means that you dumb down.

Doepfer himself showed you how you are able to react without returning 
the offense. That is how you really show superiority!

Now I'll go to the church and confess my sins.

Joachim


Am 18.11.2010 23:34, schrieb york luethje:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> Yeah, but Florian doesn't throw a temper tantrum if he doesn't immediately gets
> what he wants.
>
> On muff you complain that people on this list didn't get behind your suggestion
> but that wasn't surprising in the least. In your second post on this subject you
> started accusing Dopefer of some nefarious plot to deprive the community of the
> magic 5V rail, urging boycotts and revolution. What on earth did you expect?
>
> Ultimately, it's something the market will decide. If manufacturers see a
> business opening, they will try to fill it. If Doepfer don't feel it's worth
> their while - great. Let others do it. Untold riches await them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joachim<sonicwarrior@gmx.de>
> To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 17:02:02
> Subject: Re: [Doepfer_a100] Request for a +5V/+12V/-12V power supply in the
> standard housings
>
>
> You should learn to ignore people if you find them annoying.
>
> ... and sometimes you should get off your high horse.
> You're making mistakes and talking bullshit, too, sometimes.
>
> Am 18.11.2010 22:45, schrieb Florian Anwander:
>> Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> Am I talking chinese? (And I have already translated it to my and your
>>> mother tongue)
>> You are not talking, chinese, but you are talking too much. As you were
>> not able to read between my lines, now read it in plain ascii and in
>> your tounge: "Wenn Du rumquengeln willst, dann geh in den Kindergarten,
>> aber verschone uns hier." Ou plus court mais trop clair: "ta geule!"
>>
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.