> Hello readers, > > I've read about the technical differences between a II and IIx. But > what does this mean in a studio? Does a II have limitations in > sequencing or in the sample/soundlength. Does the operating system work > for both machines? Is a series II upgradable to IIx? Do both machine > have same stability? > I'm asking because I bought the II(x) on Ebay yesterday and know tere > are doubts if this one is a IIx. > My second question is, does anybody have a technical schedule of a > lightpen or foto's of the inside electronics, maybe the original > company who manufactured these pens? As far as I can see a MIDI option was only offered for the IIx, not for the II. So even if this is a pre-production MIDI kit I would assume that this machine is actually a IIx. Even if it was just a II there would not be much of a difference between them; the stability is probably about the same. Something that I don't exactly know (somebody correct me please): I seem to recall that with the IIx the floppy format was slightly changed. About the lightpen: I could borrow (!) you a non-working and partially disassembled one if I manage to find it. No, I won't sell it. -- Malte Rogacki gacki@gacki.sax.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Don't forget to TURN ON THE SYNTHESIZER. Often this is the reason why you get no sound out of it." (ARP 2600 Owner's Manual) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [Fairlight-CMI] II against IIx
2007-01-22 by Malte Rogacki
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.