Yahoo Groups archive
Messages
Page 55 of 56 · 2770 messages matched
2004-10-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
Well, it could, but there is a problem with this idea one must consider: In order to pan audio, to avoid clicks and dead spots one needs the transistion to be gradual, even if ever-so-slightly. This is fine for an audio signal. For a control voltge however, this dramatically chan
2004-10-05 by not known
fair enough Peter... after all, I wouldn't want to request anything that would discourage another modular manufacturer from coming into existence ;-) I guess the next question would then be this: would you be willing to sell just the circuit boards without your faceplates at a lo
2004-10-05 by selfoscillate
hello peter, i'd love that vc quad panner too, but it should be able to handle dc voltages and not only audio. best wishes ingo p.s. nice idea to start a dedicated plan b group :-) --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "(i think you can figure that out)" wrote: > > VC Quad p
2004-10-05 by Michael Truman
> But while sound swirling is definately a function of quad panning, > a dedicated panner would be capable of much more than > circular patterns. In the mid-70s Wavemakers produced a quad > panner which had a host of preset patterns including a clock and > anti-clock wise swirl,
2004-10-05 by (i think you can figure that out)
Are we talkin' a quad panner or a four channel sound swirler? If it's the latter, this can be done using the Deopfer A-144 Morphing Controller and two A-132's - and this may prove to be the best and least expensive way of going about this. But while sound swirling is definately a
2004-10-05 by Michael Truman
Hi Peter, The Balanced Stereo Output Processor sounds like a great idea. I've been hoping that someone would come out with one of these for quite some time and now my wishes may become a reality. I'll take one of these for certain. Ditto for the Quad VC Panner. I'm setting up my
2004-10-04 by David W. Skinner
I agree, it would be incredible. That's why I arranged with Cynthia to Modcanize mine before I placed my order with Peter. If you ask nice she might do yours also. :-) David W. Skinner .--- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "supisuzoi" wrote: > > here, here..! > > a cyndustr
2004-10-04 by the finger
> VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea, > actually. Let me give that some serious thought. Again, if > enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody. yeah!
2004-10-04 by Robert Hoffman
Maybe there's two separate modules, the Balanced Stereo Output, which I'm all for - sign me up, and a VC Quad panner. Rob On Monday, October 4, 2004, at 01:17 PM, Johan Boberg wrote: > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor, > it looks really useful, i would really l
2004-10-04 by Johan Boberg
Peter, I think your VCO and the new module proposals are really interesting. It's not the usual bread and butter modules. And it's fair priced too. What is your plan? Do you intend to build up a range of modules or do you see Plan B modules only as complementary modules to other
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
VC Quad panner as a stand alone sounds like a great idea, actually. Let me give that some serious thought. Again, if enough people say 'yeah', it's a win win for everybody. Thanks for this (good) idea. - P --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hoffman wrote: > Maybe t
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
I would speak to Cynthia to see if she is willing to do a one-off in Modcan format. Unfortunately, I'm not geared up for multiple formats (see my next post - I go into a bit more details on this). - P. --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, not known wrote: > after seeing the
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
I thought long and hard about mutliple formats. Here's the problem: 1) I'm a Mac guy - so Shaeffer (sp?) offers little solution to me. 2) I can do one-off faceplates through other services, but I don't think my price would be any less expensive than Cynthia's, as I've got to do a
2004-10-04 by not known
after seeing the Miniwave proposal, I started to actually think in the opposite direction... I am using a Fenix/Modcan/Cyndustries system right now, but am intrigued by the Plan B - I think it would make a nice compliment to the system, particularly some of Cynthia's Buchla-esque
2004-10-04 by Johan Boberg
About the proposed Balanced Stereo Output Processor, it looks really useful, i would really like to have one. But i would really love to have it somehow patchable as a Quad Output Processor if possible. It could still be used as a stereo out if this is preferred. I don't know exa
2004-10-04 by supisuzoi
here, here..! a cyndustries release of the Plan B modules would be incredible... just look at how stunning those cynthia miltons turned out to be! i know that cynthia will do one-off conversions on her own, but the costs are just too prohibitive. i think we'd all benefit from a c
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
This could be done - but...it would effect cost and of course real estate. But there's a quit alot more to a quad panner If enoug people want one however, I'm good with it. - P --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, Johan Boberg wrote: > About the proposed Balanced Stereo Out
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
I am creating another poll for a euro rack conversion of the Blacet/Wiard Miniwave. I have successfully made this conversion in my own system and have been contracted to do another for one specific customer. Again, I run it up the Plan B flagpole to see who salutes. There could b
2004-10-04 by PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the PLAN_B_analog_blog group: Wouold you be interested in a EUro Rack Miniwave o yes o no To vote, please visit the following web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog_blog/surveys?id=771722 Note: Please do not re
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
A tighter shot has been uploaded --- In PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com, "modularcharles" wrote: > Peter, it would be great and appreciated if you could you up the > image sizes in the photos section. The Model 16 faceplate is at the > edge of legibility on my screen. Thanks!
2004-10-04 by modularcharles
Peter, it would be great and appreciated if you could you up the image sizes in the photos section. The Model 16 faceplate is at the edge of legibility on my screen. Thanks! --Chuck
2004-10-04 by PLAN_B_analog_blog@yahoogroups.com
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the PLAN_B_analog_blog group: Would you be interested in the Balanced Stereo Output Processor (see messages for description) o yes o no To vote, please visit the following web page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PLAN_B_analog
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
I have been contracted to develop a one-off 36 RU output module and have created a poll to determine the viability of a small production run (go to polls tab). A faceplate rendering can be found in the photo section. Once selected, you may click on the image for a larger view. Th
2004-10-04 by (i think you can figure that out)
The Plan B Model 15 VCO printed circuit board sets are completed and will ship to me early next week. I should have them in a week's time. I'm then building two prototypes - one running from +/-15, one running from +/- 12 volts. I will use these two as my first article 'gold'; sa
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown
Unknown by Unknown