What a great looking synth! I'm always impressed when someone takes the
time to make a complete synth in a single panel, deciding what all the
modules will be. You used very nice design principles for the
large/small knobs, lending a wonderful consistency across these diverse
modules. It is modular in the patching sense, but not the physical
sense. I'd like to know more about this Auralesque. Do you have a
straight-on photo? A list of the modules?
-Richard Brewster
waveform100 wrote:
time to make a complete synth in a single panel, deciding what all the
modules will be. You used very nice design principles for the
large/small knobs, lending a wonderful consistency across these diverse
modules. It is modular in the patching sense, but not the physical
sense. I'd like to know more about this Auralesque. Do you have a
straight-on photo? A list of the modules?
-Richard Brewster
waveform100 wrote:
>oh! ... there it is, sharp, in the upper left of the picture:
>
>http://www.sequencer.de/pix/auralesque/Auralesque.jpg
>
>As this is a Half-Modular Synth, I had to find out how to get the
>most out of the module without having to patch it. After a long test
>(on a wooden faceplate), I had the impression, that I will use for
>the Sqr-Inputs:
>A) Output from a Divider (Blacet), this one has a Output-Attenuator
>B) Sine from the same VCO
>C): Off (Middle-Position of the Switch)
>
>For the Triangle-Inputs I added a extra input-Attenuator:
>A) Triangle (from the same VCO)
>B) Sine (from the same VCO)
>No Off (Input Attenuator)
>
>I use the Grinder separately: It has nothing to do with the Folder
>Section. I can use it to shape the Triangle of another VCO OR (as the
>Grinder is NICE for complex Inputs): I can switch the whole Grinder
>to another position between two Filters. With just one 4-Switch.
>
>BTW: The Ringmodulator in the same Picture is the Real-Ring. I love
>it, but it loads the inputs, I already mentionned that here.
>
>cheers!
>Olivier
>
>
>
>
