Elektron Musical Instruments

--- Joseph Melnyk <jmelnyk@...> wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2004, at 4:42 AM, Andrew Denyes wrote:
> 
> >  Using
> > 1 track out of a 6 track Monomachine just for
> controls would be 
> > somewhat
> > less exciting.
> 
> agreed.  I hate even having to sacrifice a MnM track
> to FX (though they 
> sound
> great).  they should make an SFX-12 :-)
> 
> BUT it would be cool to have the FUNCTION +
> parameter change 
> functionality
> in the MnM; mainly for global filter sweeps and
> global delay changes.
> 
> for those who don't know (e.g. this thread's
> creator): the 
> functionality I'm speaking of
> is a new MD function whereby if you hold FUNCTION
> while changing a 
> parameter,
> the parameter will be changed in each track's
> machine.
> 
> >  I would rather the Monomachine got a new FX
> machine, like a
> > ring modulator or distortion synthesizer.
> 
> I highly agree! I've been hoping for more FX ever
> since the beta
> release said they planned further ones.  they did
> add the chorus one 
> since
> then, but I've been hoping for the phaser and
> flanger as well. ring mod 
> would
> also be cool :-) a dream feature would be if you
> could replace the delay
> effect in a track with another effect; like chorus,
> reverb, ring mod, 
> etc. but
> again, it's a dream feature!
> 
> Joe
> 
> 


Ah yes! The Function hold feature would be an awesome
tool to add. Also a retrigger function for all the
machines would be tight! :o)


	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/