party
2002-10-27 by D.E
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:22 UTC
Thread
2002-10-27 by D.E
for those of you who attended the Elektron party last night, thanks !!!! It was definitely the party of the year! erase
2002-10-29 by phonophobie
(i was not there :( did elektron some liveact or did they have some new equipment there.. anything about elektron? i am just wandering what these guys are doing with homemade stuff? or did they just party and get drunken? -p --- In elektron-users@y..., "D.E" <erase@a...> wrote: > for those of you who attended the Elektron party last night, thanks !!!!
> It was definitely the party of the year! > > erase
2002-10-29 by splank
The Elektron guys are quite young (I\ufffdd say mid or end twenty). They were so busy with organizing the party that they didn\ufffdt play themselves I guess. I don\ufffdt even know if they have musical projects. Ask them... I heard some rumours about a new machine they are working on. We (Rob Acid and me) tryed to get some more info. But even at the end of the party where everybody had some beers inside they didn\ufffdt say a word :) Flo -----Urspr\ufffdngliche Nachricht----- Von: phonophobie [mailto:sidstation@...] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 17:58 An: elektron-users@yahoogroups.com Betreff: [elektron] Re: party (i was not there :( did elektron some liveact or did they have some new equipment there.. anything about elektron? i am just wandering what these guys are doing with homemade stuff? or did they just party and get drunken? -p --- In elektron-users@y..., "D.E" <erase@a...> wrote: > for those of you who attended the Elektron party last night, thanks !!!! > It was definitely the party of the year! > > erase Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2002-10-29 by belplascaprod
I'VE GOT SOME INFO!!!! :-)))) One of the members of the Swedish band Pluxus told me this: A drunken Elektron member once mentioned the instrument and referred to it as a sampler. I'm NOT sure about the correctness of this information, it is only a rumour. Anyhow, we confronted Henrik of Elektron with this, but he only said "you shouldn't listen to a drunken man!" What he DID say, however, is that they are building a prototype (or have built it already), and that it is planned for release in the spring! He also said that they've made a promise not to give away any info about the instrument. But, as with the Machinedrum, delays might occur.... so don't start sending pissed off e-mails to Elektron if the instrument isn't appearing in the early spring! :) Regards Nils --- In elektron-users@y..., "splank" <splank@z...> wrote: > > The Elektron guys are quite young (I´d say mid or end twenty). > They were so busy with organizing the party that they didn´t play themselves > I guess. > I don´t even know if they have musical projects. Ask them... > > I heard some rumours about a new machine they are working on. > We (Rob Acid and me) tryed to get some more info. > But even at the end of the party where everybody had some beers inside > they didn´t say a word :) > > Flo > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: phonophobie [mailto:sidstation@h...] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 17:58 > An: elektron-users@y... > Betreff: [elektron] Re: party > > > (i was not there :( > > did elektron some liveact or did they have some new equipment there.. > anything about elektron? i am just wandering what these guys are > doing with homemade stuff? or did they just party and get drunken? > > -p > > > --- In elektron-users@y..., "D.E" <erase@a...> wrote: > > for those of you who attended the Elektron party last night, > thanks !!!! > > It was definitely the party of the year! > > > > erase > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2002-10-29 by Gert van Santen
A drunken > Elektron member once mentioned the instrument and referred to it as a > sampler hmm, that would fit in Electron's policy to only release instruments that seem rather anachronistic (I mean, with all the softsamplers and stuff). Plus, one would be able to compose a complete album or live set on 3 different Electron instruments... cheers, Gert [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2002-10-29 by splank
Well, here we go... Well, one elektron guy said: "it\ufffds something like a synthesizer" But this means nothing. It could be also a Sampler or whatever. I know Elektron wouldn\ufffdt just make a sampler or synth. Because then the MD would just be a Drum Machine. And Daniel Hansson said they want to have a prototype ready for the Musikmesse in Frankfurt, which is in spring. Flo -----Urspr\ufffdngliche Nachricht----- Von: belplascaprod [mailto:nilsodegaard@...] Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 20:37 An: elektron-users@yahoogroups.com Betreff: [elektron] Re: party I'VE GOT INFO!!!!! I'VE GOT SOME INFO!!!! :-)))) One of the members of the Swedish band Pluxus told me this: A drunken Elektron member once mentioned the instrument and referred to it as a sampler. I'm NOT sure about the correctness of this information, it is only a rumour. Anyhow, we confronted Henrik of Elektron with this, but he only said "you shouldn't listen to a drunken man!" What he DID say, however, is that they are building a prototype (or have built it already), and that it is planned for release in the spring! He also said that they've made a promise not to give away any info about the instrument. But, as with the Machinedrum, delays might occur.... so don't start sending pissed off e-mails to Elektron if the instrument isn't appearing in the early spring! :) Regards Nils --- In elektron-users@y..., "splank" <splank@z...> wrote: > > The Elektron guys are quite young (I\ufffdd say mid or end twenty). > They were so busy with organizing the party that they didn\ufffdt play themselves > I guess. > I don\ufffdt even know if they have musical projects. Ask them... > > I heard some rumours about a new machine they are working on. > We (Rob Acid and me) tryed to get some more info. > But even at the end of the party where everybody had some beers inside > they didn\ufffdt say a word :) > > Flo > > > > > > > -----Urspr\ufffdngliche Nachricht----- > Von: phonophobie [mailto:sidstation@h...] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 17:58 > An: elektron-users@y... > Betreff: [elektron] Re: party > > > (i was not there :( > > did elektron some liveact or did they have some new equipment there.. > anything about elektron? i am just wandering what these guys are > doing with homemade stuff? or did they just party and get drunken? > > -p > > > --- In elektron-users@y..., "D.E" <erase@a...> wrote: > > for those of you who attended the Elektron party last night, > thanks !!!! > > It was definitely the party of the year! > > > > erase > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
2002-10-30 by Mind Mechanic
--- In elektron-users@y..., "belplascaprod" <nilsodegaard@h...> wrote: > already), and that it is planned for release in the spring! He also > said that they've made a promise not to give away any info about Did they say if they need any alpha testers? :)
2002-10-30 by M-.-n
Wonder if it has anything to do with that 'lab' section on their web site that has never been opened
2002-11-15 by scutopus
if it is indeed to be a sampler, i hope it has support from recycle as well as other computer editing programs.... --- In elektron-users@y..., "Gert van Santen" <g.vansanten@c...> wrote: > A drunken > > Elektron member once mentioned the instrument and referred to it as a > > sampler
2002-11-17 by sidstationownsyou
If Elektron is making a sampler, I've got a list of features that would make it the ultimate sampler: -retrigger (like on Machinedrum's E12 drums) -reverse -pitch shift -time stretch -ranges of notes can trigger the sample, with different parameter locks -all parameters can be controller through CC messages -parameter locks for each note are programable -can save "kits" where note ranges / parameter locks are uniquely set -multiple 1/4" outputs (assignable routings) -filters -FX (send amounts are parameters for each note) -reverb -compressor -isolated delay for each individual output (can accomplish stereo delay on master outs) -flanger/phaser/chorus -ring modulator -velocity controls volume of sample -pan parameter (affects master out) -ADSR amp envelopes -assignable envelopes (can also affect FX parameters) -LFOs (can also affect FX parameters) -note ranges for a particular sample can be set and stored in a kit -scrub trimming of a sample with graphical display and adjustable scrub length -volume chopping with programmable rhythm loops (no pops/clicks) -hard disk OR cdrw drive stores all samples -DDR RAM stores samples currently being used (according to kit) -ability to cut, copy, paste parts of a sample (using scrub to mark points) -ability to create a new sample by pasting parts of others together -ability to merge two samples into one (bounce two tracks, each with their own parameter settings, into one track) [eg. 2 snare drums] -USB port to export samples to a computer -XOX step sequencer (similar to machinedrum) -blue on black background active (glowing) display with as many pixels as machinedrum's display
2002-11-17 by oldmanfury
I think that the "secret" project elektron refuses to talk about is porting SAM the "Semi Automatic Mouth" from the original C64 machine code over to SIDStation. They liscensed it from SoftVoice Inc. This program was essential - the best voice synthesizer at the time. I used to crank-call people using it. If elektron really was going to add SAM to the sidstation, I'd buy one. As it stands, I'll just have to be happy with quadrasid and my MD :) -gerald --- In elektron-users@y..., "sidstationownsyou" <sidstationownsyou@h...> wrote: > If Elektron is making a sampler, I've got a list of features that would make it the
2002-11-17 by Federico Ciapi
I'd like it to be something like the MPC... An innovative sampler engine and a full sequencer, with parameter locks recordable in the whole song, not only in patterns (will we ever see this in the MD?) At least 2 midi in/out And keep it easy to use!
2002-11-18 by R. Cliff Young
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, oldmanfury wrote: > I think that the "secret" project elektron refuses to talk about is > porting SAM the "Semi Automatic Mouth" from the original C64 machine > code over to SIDStation. They liscensed it from SoftVoice Inc. This > program was essential - the best voice synthesizer at the time. I > used to crank-call people using it. Heh heh, I guess I'm not the only one that did that. I had a 1660 modem hooked to my C64--that was the one that had an audio splitter cable, since it supported touch tone dialing by using the C64's SID to generate the tones. :) I wrote a little program that generated the appropriate tones when you pressed the relevant keys (0-9, #, *), had the function keys mapped to text strings that'd be sent to SAM (and could be redefined on the fly), and you could always hit Return and type whatever you want to be output through SAM. Pretty silly, really, but at the time I had fun with it, having entire phone conversations just tapping function keys and typing away. SAM stood for "Software Automated Mouth" actually, and I believe it was distributed by Don't Ask Software. To this day I've never really heard any significant advances in voice synthesis, or at least text-to-speech. SAM had some pretty impressive text-to-speech capabilities considering its low memory footprint (maybe 12-18K? I can't recall...). > If elektron really was going to add SAM to the sidstation, I'd buy > one. As it stands, I'll just have to be happy with quadrasid and my > MD :) > -gerald Maybe they'll include it in their mythical SAMpler. :) That'd seriously be a good idea for a generator to bundle with. I like the idea of an Elektron sampler, but I'd be really keen on it if you could do all sorts of whacky stuff without ever having to hook up an external input. Basically, I'll take the feature list appearing in an earlier message, plus, oh, something on par with a NORD modular plus SAM for internal sample generation. :) -- R. Cliff Young <nukenin@...> /\/ Chaos Never Died http://www.roguebard.com/
2002-11-18 by Flavio Alvarez
> with parameter locks > recordable in the whole song, not only in patterns > (will we ever see > this in the MD?) Yeah!!! Really!!!! __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site http://webhosting.yahoo.com
2002-11-18 by Cosmic Trance
Wow! That SAM thing sounds cool! Are there any examples on the internet where I can hear the voice of SAM? I'm curious how it differs from other text-speech software. Maybe someone could point me to a .C64 program to run it on my emu!?!? -Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: R. Cliff Young
To: elektron-users@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [elektron] Re: Sampler / SAM
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, oldmanfury wrote:
> I think that the "secret" project elektron refuses to talk about is
> porting SAM the "Semi Automatic Mouth" from the original C64 machine
> code over to SIDStation. They liscensed it from SoftVoice Inc. This
> program was essential - the best voice synthesizer at the time. I
> used to crank-call people using it.
Heh heh, I guess I'm not the only one that did that. I had a 1660 modem
hooked to my C64--that was the one that had an audio splitter cable, since
it supported touch tone dialing by using the C64's SID to generate the
tones. :) I wrote a little program that generated the appropriate tones
when you pressed the relevant keys (0-9, #, *), had the function keys
mapped to text strings that'd be sent to SAM (and could be redefined on
the fly), and you could always hit Return and type whatever you want to
be output through SAM. Pretty silly, really, but at the time I had fun
with it, having entire phone conversations just tapping function keys and
typing away.
SAM stood for "Software Automated Mouth" actually, and I believe it was
distributed by Don't Ask Software. To this day I've never really heard
any significant advances in voice synthesis, or at least text-to-speech.
SAM had some pretty impressive text-to-speech capabilities considering its
low memory footprint (maybe 12-18K? I can't recall...).
> If elektron really was going to add SAM to the sidstation, I'd buy
> one. As it stands, I'll just have to be happy with quadrasid and my
> MD :)
> -gerald
Maybe they'll include it in their mythical SAMpler. :) That'd seriously
be a good idea for a generator to bundle with. I like the idea of an
Elektron sampler, but I'd be really keen on it if you could do all sorts
of whacky stuff without ever having to hook up an external input.
Basically, I'll take the feature list appearing in an earlier message,
plus, oh, something on par with a NORD modular plus SAM for internal
sample generation. :)
--
R. Cliff Young <nukenin@...> /\/ Chaos Never Died
http://www.roguebard.com/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]2002-11-19 by endlessnessisticman
> SAM stood for "Software Automated Mouth" actually, and I believe it was > distributed by Don't Ask Software. To this day I've never really heard > any significant advances in voice synthesis, or at least text-to- speech. You should search for anything called "experimental phonetics". There is alot of study in speach and it's synthesis. I've never heard of SAM. As I linguist I don't care for text to speach. Although this is good for practical reasons (the blind), writing is independant of the production of language. I would prefer a program that allows me to make the different basic speech elements such as the consonanats or vowels. Something that emulates the mouth and articulation, etc. This would be a great machine to add to the MD. Could call it a Vox-Box. It could at least make it sound like some vowels. I'm sure we could make the consonants with the current machines. But there is that program called SayIt. You can get it from that DirectX site. You type it in the program and it makes a voice. You can save to a wave file with it.
2002-11-19 by Andy Tarpinian
heh, i had this Optimus Prime thing where a straw thing came out of the back of him and when you put the straw in your mouth and mouthed words over it you would sound like a transformer. I wish i could find it : ( On Tuesday, November 19, 2002, at 03:14 AM, endlessnessisticman wrote: >> SAM stood for "Software Automated Mouth" actually, and I believe > it was >> distributed by Don't Ask Software. To this day I've never really > heard >> any significant advances in voice synthesis, or at least text-to- > speech. > > You should search for anything called "experimental phonetics". > There is alot of study in speach and it's synthesis. I've never > heard of SAM. As I linguist I don't care for text to speach. > Although this is good for practical reasons (the blind), writing is > independant of the production of language. I would prefer a program > that allows me to make the different basic speech elements such as > the consonanats or vowels. Something that emulates the mouth and > articulation, etc. This would be a great machine to add to the MD. > Could call it a Vox-Box. It could at least make it sound like some > vowels. I'm sure we could make the consonants with the current > machines. > > But there is that program called SayIt. You can get it from that > DirectX site. You type it in the program and it makes a voice. You > can save to a wave file with it. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > Andy Tarpinian Art Director Barkley Kalpak Associates,Inc. The Business Theatre and Corporate Entertainment Experts 315 West 39th Street Studio 607 New York, NY 10018 212-947-1502 212-947-1503 (fax) www.bka.net www.go2teamnet.com
2002-11-20 by teenwoolph@aol.com
I had one of those too! I miss that thing. In a message dated 11/19/02 2:53:02 PM, evildead@... writes: << heh, i had this Optimus Prime thing where a straw thing came out of the back of him and when you put the straw in your mouth and mouthed words over it you would sound like a transformer. I wish i could find it : ( >>
2002-11-20 by R. Cliff Young
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, endlessnessisticman wrote: > You should search for anything called "experimental phonetics". > There is alot of study in speach and it's synthesis. I've never > heard of SAM. As I linguist I don't care for text to speach. [...] Most speech synthesis software, SAM included, actually use phonemes to represent the various speech sounds, perhaps with an additional set of symbols to represent inflection or other variance. The text-to-speech algorithms convert English text (or whichever language texts are supported) to a suitable phonetic/inflective equivalent. I am impressed to this day by the text-to-speech algorithms SAM used, since they provided fairly good results for a really low memory footprint. I believe you also had the option of loading SAM without the TTS engine, in which case you had to provide the phonemes directly. If you wanted to really micromanage pronunciation, or you were trying to deliver certain effects like "singing", you really wanted to bypass the TTS engine and deal directly with SAM via phonemes etc anyway. SAM wasn't limited to the C=64, either--I believe it existed for at least the "big 3" 8-bit platforms (Apple ][, Atari 400/800, C=64) and perhaps others as well. > But there is that program called SayIt. You can get it from that > DirectX site. You type it in the program and it makes a voice. You > can save to a wave file with it. You're referring to AnalogX, actually (www.analogx.com). Some nifty tools to be found there. -- R. Cliff Young <nukenin@...> /\/ Chaos Never Died http://www.roguebard.com/
2002-11-22 by Crackpot
> SAM stood for "Software Automated Mouth" actually, and I believe it was
> distributed by Don't Ask Software. To this day I've never really heard
> any significant advances in voice synthesis, or at least text-to-speech.
yes, isn't that weird? I would expect perhaps a small improvement,
but nada. Perhaps sample playback has superceded it or something?
I dunno. oh well :)
p.s. if you use "Say it" from analogx, it's not exactly
obvious, but the pitch bar is in Hz. So, if you know the freq's
of notes, you can do some fun things, like make tuned choruses
chant your phrases, or just make weird sounds and pitch them accurately.
p.p.s. if you use say it from analogx, what the *HELL* is that
"Cascad" bar all about? all it does is f@#U*$@#$ck up my sound
consdierably.
DSP Audio Effects! http://gweep.net/~shifty
. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .
"La la la laaa laaa laaa " | Niente
La la la laaa laaa laaa." -Stereolab | shifty@...