Haha, I just remembered -- the money I saved on not going with the
Sherman is what ended up being used to buy my SidStation. I wouldn't
even be on this list if it weren't for going with the MFC42. ;-]
On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Damon Menne wrote:
> While I'm not a sherman owner, I could have been.
>
> I had an Akai MFC42 and a Sherman side-by-side to mess with for a
> couple days, and ended up going with the MFC42. The $500 price
> difference wasn't worth the sound difference. To me, by going with the
> MFC42, I got 90% of the quality for 40% the price.
>
> On Monday, September 22, 2003, at 09:38 AM, Behn Humphrey wrote:
>
> > hey there.
> >
> > so... OT but it sounds like lots of people here have/have experiance
> > with
> > the Sherman Filterbanks....
> >
> > was wondering how different the FB2 is compared to the FB1.... the
> > cheapest
> > i can find the 2 for is around $700, and i have a friend that is
> > willing to
> > sell me his FB1 for $400. this will be my first outboard filter
> (love
> > the
> > demo, have played with FB's before... goot stoof), should i wait till
> > i can
> > afford the FB2? should i get the FB1? if i have the FB1 for awhile
> > and
> > LOVE it will i want to get the FB2?
> >
> > thanks much,
> >
> > -0behn desu0-
> > djbokuno.com
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month
> > (depending on the local service providers in your area).
> > https://broadband.msn.com
> >
> >
> <image.tiff>
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
<image.tiff>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]