On a fine day, 22-03-2004, Paul Zimmer wrote: >Could you please explain the original poster's misdemeanour, except to post >a completely on-topic question, which a fair number of people seemed very >happy to respond to and debate? As I explained before, what I objected to was not the question itself, but the explicit underlying attitude: "you probably have recently discussed this question but I'll ask anyway". I know I didn't come across too friendly, and I apologized for that already (see prev. msg). I should probably have phrased my objections differently. Choosing other (i.e. more friendly) words doesn't change my objections to this kind of attitude though. And yes, I know yahoo-search is not all that, but then someone could have said something like "I tried searching the archives but didn't find anything, so...". Oh well, I'd better go back to hitting the delete-key I suppose... And maybe we'd better give this a rest -- it's taking up way too much msgs already, and I suppose 99% of the population isn't interested at all... -- Hendrik Jan Veenstra h @ k n o w a r e . n l Omega Art: http://www.omega-art.com/
Message
RE: [EXS] Re: orchestral sounds
2004-03-23 by Hendrik Jan Veenstra