kirbyko3@... wrote: >>Does anyone know the difference(s) between the Emperor and the >>B\ufffdsendorfer 290? They're both B\ufffdsendorfers and both by Michiel Post, so >>how different can they be? > > They're reallllllly different! The Emperor is really in-your-face; sort of > a zingy and bright sound with a bass that's got a nice thickness & edge to it. > The PMI 290 is still my most-used piano sound tho -- it's a little more > tame and has different variations on the tone & different presets you can use - > dark piano, bright piano, etc. Emperor would be great for straight > classical recordings in a hall setting, and while the PMI 290 would be equally as > good, it's a little more versatile if you wanted to use it for film-ish sounds, > pop, or if you wanted a nice solo piano in that George Winston sort of way. If > you're doing a big orchestral mix, the Emperor would be the one to use - it > definitely sticks out more. Thanks Kerry. :-) Already got the PMI290, so I didn't want to get the Emperor if it was virtually the same. $80 is a fantasic price, but it's still $80, ya know?
Message
Re: [EXS] Emperor vs. PMI 290
2004-11-26 by Bill Canty
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.