It depends on your work method. Different work routines involving available tools can lead to a successful creative environments in more than one specific way. Having every tool inside the computer is convenient and is one method. Having your hands on a hardware sampler or dedicated drum machine is another. I don't think that one is better than the other. It just depends on what routine has evolved in your workplace. I still read about many of the "pro" groove programmers arriving with their samplers or drum machines and favourite set of samples. By using a software sampler you elect to work a certain way. I'm starting to think that hardware boxes are the way to go. Having gigabytes of samples and thousands of sounds available is not a good way to go. The sounds I'm hearing in some of the new modules are way better and more inspiring than any of the sample cd's I have (and I've bought a lot). It's also a much faster way to work and it gets you away from playing with your computer and obsessing about collecting and categorising samples. I'd rather spend $2000 on a Emu Mophatt module than $1000 on an EXS and Battery. No CPU load, better sounds, resale value, no need to sample anything. What I'm saying is that I wouldn't rush out and sell my hardware. Having everything inside the computer is convenient but there are better and more creative ways to work IMHO. Phil Buckle.
Message
Re: [exs] Can EXS24 replace a hardware sampler?
2002-01-08 by Phil Buckle
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.