EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

EXS 24 Logic Sampler Users Group

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:25 UTC

Message

Re: [exs] Can EXS24 replace a hardware sampler?

2002-01-08 by Alvaro Villalobos

Hello!

For me it has replaced the hardware!

About a year ago I was ready to buy an Akai sampler but then came the EXS 24 
and I got it nowadays I know I couldn\ufffdt haved lived my life without it!!

If it wasn\ufffdt for my EXS I surely would have to buy a hardware sampler but I 
don\ufffdt have any good reasons for that know just get a good soundcard and use 
that for your EXS 24 I\ufffdm sure you would love it!

Best regards,

Alvaro Villalobos.


Ps. I only have one SPDIF in/out but If you are using digital I\ufffdve heard 
there are several reasons to get a card wich is using opticals in/out my 
friend is using this and he has 42 in/out digital wich he surely is pleased 
with! Ds.

>From: Phil Buckle <pbuckle@...>
>Reply-To: exs-users@yahoogroups.com
>To: <exs-users@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [exs] Can EXS24 replace a hardware sampler?
>Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 21:02:23 +1000
>
>It depends on your work method.  Different work routines involving 
>available
>tools can lead to a successful creative environments in more than one
>specific way.
>Having every tool inside the computer is convenient and is one method.
>Having your hands on a hardware sampler or dedicated drum machine is
>another.
>I don't think that one is better than the other. It just depends on what
>routine has evolved in your workplace.
>I still read about many of the "pro" groove programmers  arriving with 
>their
>samplers or drum machines and favourite set of samples.
>By using a software sampler you elect to work a certain way.
>I'm starting to think that hardware boxes are the way to go.
>Having gigabytes of samples and thousands of sounds available is not a good
>way to go. The sounds I'm hearing in some of the new modules are way better
>and more inspiring than any of the sample cd's I have (and I've bought a
>lot). It's also a much faster way to work and it gets you away from playing
>with your computer and obsessing about collecting and categorising samples.
>I'd rather spend $2000 on a Emu Mophatt module than $1000 on an EXS and
>Battery. No CPU load, better sounds, resale value, no need to sample
>anything.
>What I'm saying is that I wouldn't rush out and sell my hardware. Having
>everything inside the computer is convenient but there are better and more
>creative ways to work IMHO.
>Phil Buckle.
>




_________________________________________________________________
Kom med i v\ufffdrldens st\ufffdrsta e-posttj\ufffdnst; MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com/sv

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.