> > >This is an interesting point for me. I have been told by many akai listers >that loading a sampler up with CDROMs will kill any sound module. Well I can >honestly say that with over 100 CDROMS and my EXS24 and 360Mgs of RAM, I >never use the EXS24 for sounds. I use my 32Mgs Korg TR-Rack and my Nord Lead >2. > You have to use the machines for the things they're meant for. You can't expect EXS to replace a virtual analog synth. EXS can replace a sound module IF you have the right CD's that are _well-programmed_. Finding CD's with sounds is easy. Finding well-programmed CD's that makes use of most of the features of a sampler are much harder to find. That's where sound modules have an advantage: their ROM soundset is fixed within the synth, which means it only has to be compatible with the synth parameters of that synth. This means a lot of time can be put in programming the sounds to make optimal use of the synth's parameters. I have a couple of sample CD's which are great, e.g. I have a CD with guitar sounds that beats any soundmodule. However, I haven't found enough well-programmed sample libraries yet to cover all instruments a sound module covers. So for the time being: >Do I need to go and spend a few thousand on a Roland JV5080 fully loaded to >satisfy my sounds cravings??? > Depending on your needs, this might be the case. >PS, I got Ultimate piano CDROM, 100's of megs, sound like SHIT. My TR-Rack >0.5 Mg piano is waay better??? > Well, I don't know that particular CD, but I still think it's a strange statement. I'd expect it to be the other way around. -- Belway Productions
Message
Re: [exs] Can EXS24 replace a hardware sampler?
2002-01-11 by Joeri Vankeirsbilck
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.